Jump to content

Draft:One Hundred and Twenty Ninth Amendment Bill, 2024

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-ninth Amendment) Bill, 2024 popularly known as the One Nation One Election Bill,2024 is a proposed legislation in India aimed at synchronizing elections for the Lok Sabha (House of the People) and all State Legislative Assemblies.[1] [2][3]

This initiative seeks to reduce the frequency of elections across the country, enhance governance efficiency, and decrease the financial burden associated with separate electoral cycles.[4]

Background

[edit]

The concept of simultaneous elections was common in India during the early years after independence. From 1952 to 1967, elections for the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies were conducted together. However, the synchronization was disrupted due to premature dissolution of certain State Assemblies and the Lok Sabha. The idea was revisited in recent years as successive governments faced challenges posed by continuous election cycles.[5]

The Law Commission of India, in its 170th Report (1999) and 255th Report (2015), recommended the implementation of simultaneous elections. The NITI Aayog also emphasized the potential benefits of this model in its 2017 discussion paper.[6]

The Narendra Modi led government formed a High level Committee also known as The Kovind Committee under the charimanship of Former President Ramnath Kovind.[7]

The Committee after a prolonged public consultation submitted its recommendation Report to the President of India. [8]

Objective

[edit]

The primary goal of the proposed amendment or One Nation, One Election Bill is to align elections to minimize the disruption caused by frequent polls, including administrative challenges, financial costs, and the imposition of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC), which often delays developmental activities.[9][10]

Key objectives include:

  1. Cost Reduction: Lowering the financial burden of conducting elections at frequent intervals.
  2. Administrative Efficiency: Streamlining the deployment of election resources like personnel and security forces.
  3. Governance Continuity: Reducing policy paralysis caused by frequent imposition of the MCC.
  4. Boosting Voter Turnout: Enhancing voter participation by consolidating elections into fewer cycles.

Key Provisions

[edit]

The Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Bill proposes the following amendments:

  1. Changes to Tenure Provisions: Modifying Articles 83, 172, 85, and 174 of the Constitution to ensure synchronized terms for the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies.
  2. Empowering the Election Commission of India (ECI): Granting the ECI additional authority to manage logistical complexities.
  3. Special Provisions for Mid-Term Polls: Mechanisms to align elections in cases of premature dissolution or extension of terms.

Challenges & Criticism

[edit]

Despite its potential benefits, the Bill has drawn criticism from various quarters:

  1. Constitutional Amendments: The extensive changes to multiple constitutional provisions may face legal challenges.
  2. Federal Concerns: Some states argue that simultaneous elections may undermine the autonomy of State Legislatures.
  3. Logistical Complexities: Managing nationwide elections in a vast and diverse country like India is a significant challenge.
  4. Democratic Principles: Critics worry that simultaneous elections might dilute the accountability of elected representatives who are held accountable at different intervals.
  5. Danger for Regional Parties : Experts believes that synchronizing Parliamentary and State elections will overshadow regional parties and is a potential threat to their existence establishing duopoly in the Country.
  6. Implementation: Election Experts argue that the implementation of the bill shall remain a challenge for Election Commission as the Commission needs 3 Years for preparation of EVMs, logistics & other necessary arrangements.

Future

[edit]

The Bill was introduced in Parliament in 2024 and referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee for further deliberation & Consensus.[11]

The committee has been tasked with consulting legal experts, political parties, and stakeholders to evaluate the feasibility of the proposed reforms.[12]




References

[edit]