Draft:In re article 370 of the constitution
In re: article 370 of the constitution | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Court | Supreme Court of India |
Full case name | In re: article 370 of the constitution |
Decided | 11 December 2023 |
Citation | A2023 INSC 1058 |
Court membership | |
Judges sitting | Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud (Chief Justice), S.K. Kaul , Sanjiv Khanna, B.R. Gavai, Surya Kant |
In re: Article 370 of the Constitution of India case also known as Article 370 Abrogation Case was a landmark legal case decided by the Supreme Court of India in 2023. The case centered on the constitutional validity of actions taken by the Government of India in August 2019 to effectively abrogate Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, which had granted special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir.[1]
Background
[edit]Article 370, enacted in 1949, provided Jammu and Kashmir with a special status within the Indian Union, allowing it to have its own constitution, a separate flag, and autonomy over internal administration, except in matters of defense, foreign affairs, and communications. On August 5, 2019, the President of India issued Constitutional Order 272, which applied all provisions of the Indian Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir and modified Article 367. The following day, Constitutional order 273 was issued, declaring Article 370 inoperative. Concurrently, the Indian Parliament passed the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, bifurcating the state into two Union Territories: Jammu and Kashmir (with a legislative assembly) and Ladakh (without a legislative assembly).[2]
Legal Challenge
[edit]These actions were immediately challenged in the Supreme Court through multiple petitions filed by various individuals, political parties, and civil society organizations. A five-judge Constitution Bench, led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, was formed to hear the case.
Key Issues
[edit]The main issues before the court were:
- Whether Jammu and Kashmir possessed sovereignty separate from India
- Whether Article 370 was a temporary or permanent provision
- The validity of Constitutional Orders 272 and 273
- The constitutionality of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019
- The legality of actions taken during President's Rule
Decision
[edit]The court held that Jammu and Kashmir did not possess separate sovereignty. It reasoned that the Instrument of Accession signed by Maharaja Hari Singh in 1947 and subsequent proclamations indicated full surrender of sovereignty to India. The court noted that the special status granted to Jammu and Kashmir was not indicative of sovereignty but was necessitated by the conditions in the state at the time of accession.
Nature of Article 370
[edit]The court ruled that Article 370 was a temporary provision. This interpretation was based on the article's placement in Part XXI of the Constitution (Temporary Provisions) and its marginal note indicating "temporary provisions". The court explained that Article 370 was introduced to serve both a transitional purpose and a temporary purpose in view of the special circumstances in the state.[3]
Validity of Constitutional Orders
[edit]The court upheld the validity of both Constitutional Order 272 and Constitutional Order 273. For Constitutional Order 272, it reasoned that the President had the power to apply all provisions of the Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370(1)(d) without requiring the State government's concurrence during President's rule. The court held that the principle of consultation and collaboration between the Union and the State was not required in this case, as the effect of applying all provisions of the Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir was equivalent to issuing a notification under Article 370(3).[4]
Regarding Constitutional Order 273, the court held that the President's power under Article 370(3) to declare the article inoperative was valid and did not require the Constituent Assembly's recommendation, as it had ceased to exist. The court viewed this as a culmination of the ongoing process of constitutional integration.
Constitutionality of the Reorganisation Act
[edit]The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 was upheld as constitutional. The court noted that Article 3 of the Constitution permits the formation of new Union Territories. It also took into account the government's assurance that Jammu and Kashmir's status as a Union Territory is temporary and that statehood would be restored. The court directed the Election Commission to conduct elections for the Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly by September 30, 2024, emphasizing that democratic processes should not be delayed until the restoration of statehood. This judgment marked a significant constitutional development in India, altering the status of Jammu and Kashmir and its relationship with the Union of India. It clarified the nature of Article 370 and set precedents for the interpretation of similar constitutional provisions in the future.[5]
Significance
[edit]This judgment marked a significant constitutional development in India, altering the status of Jammu and Kashmir and its relationship with the Union of India. It provided clarity on the nature of Article 370, the extent of presidential powers in modifying constitutional provisions, and the Parliament's authority in reorganizing states.
See Also
[edit]- Article 370 of the Constitution of India
- Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019
- Special status of Jammu and Kashmir
References
[edit]- ^ "What's Article 370? What to know about India top court verdict on Kashmir". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
- ^ Bhaumik, Aaratrika (12 December 2023). "Supreme Court's verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370 | Explained". The Hindu. The Hindu. Retrieved 12 December 2023.
- ^ Rajagopal, Krishnadas (11 December 2023). "SC upholds abrogation of Article 370, says move was part of 70-year-old exercise to integrate J&K to the Union". The Hindu.
- ^ "SC verdict upholds Article 370 abrogation, orders J&K Assembly polls by September 2024". BusinessLine. 11 December 2023.
- ^ "Explained: Key aspects of Supreme Court's Article 370 verdict". The Indian Express. 12 December 2023.