Jump to content

Draft:Gregory Robson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gregory Robson

Gregory Robson is associate research professor in the Mendoza College of Business at the University of Notre Dame.

Early life and education

[edit]

Robson studied at Vanderbilt, Harvard, Duke, and the Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas in Rome, and in the doctoral program in political philosophy at the University of Arizona. There, he pursued interests in business ethics and technology ethics.

Career

[edit]

He worked at Iowa State University and Wake Forest University.

He has published research in technology ethics.[1][2][3], business ethics [4] [5] [6], political economy [7] [8] [9], public discourse [10] [11], eminent domain law [12][13], virtue ethics [14][15], Christian philosophy [16][17][18], international ethics [19][20], and justice[21][22]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Technology Ethics: A Philosophical Introduction and Readings (Routledge 2023; co-editor with Jonathan Tsou) Journal Articles
  2. ^ The Threat of Comprehensive Overstimulation in Modern Societies” Ethics and Information Technology vol. 19 (2017), 69-80
  3. ^ “Echo Chambers, Commerce, and Human Flourishing,” in Technology Ethics: A Philosophical Introduction and Readings (Routledge, eds. Gregory Robson and Jonathan Tsou, 2nd ed.)
  4. ^ How to Object to the Profit System (and How Not To),” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 188 (2023): 205-219
  5. ^ Freedom in Business: Elizabeth Anderson, Adam Smith, and the Effects of Dominance in Business,” Philosophy of Management (with James R. Otteson)
  6. ^ The Profit System: How (and Why) to Deflect the Radical Critique,” Constitutional Political Economy, vol. 35 (2024): 109-122
  7. ^ “The Rationality of Political Experimentation,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics, vol. 20 (2021), 67-98, https://journals.sagepub.com/eprint/JWJC9B4BEI7KMQXHG5YY/full
  8. ^ To Profit Maximize, or Not to Profit Maximize?: For Firms, This Is A Valid Question” Economics & Philosophy vol. 35 (2019), 307-320
  9. ^ Profitable Business: Smith’s Moral Assessment,” Speaking of Smith, AdamSmithWorks.org, January 2021
  10. ^ The Right to Inquire Into the Personal Worldviews of Candidates for Political Office,” Public Affairs Quarterly vol. 34 (2020), 72-96
  11. ^ The Duty to be Transparent When Supporting Laws in Public Discourse,” Social Theory and Practice, vol. 49 (2023), 337-362
  12. ^ Kelo v. City of New London: Its Ironic Impact on Takings Authority” The Urban Lawyer (American Bar Association) vol. 44 (Fall 2012), 865-908
  13. ^ “The Ironic Legislative Response to Kelo” The Municipal Lawyer (NY State Bar Association) vol. 26 (Summer 2012), 24-28
  14. ^ The Varieties of Moral Vice: An Aristotelian Approach,” Erkenntnis, vol. 89 (2024): 1993-2012
  15. ^ How to Object to the Profit System (and How Not To),” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 188 (2023): 205-219
  16. ^ Reconsidering the Necessary Beings of Aquinas’s Third Way” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion vol. 4 (Spring 2012), 219-241
  17. ^ The Ontological Argument: Kant’s Criticisms, Plantinga’s Reply” Kant Studies Online (2012), 122-171
  18. ^ The Right to Inquire Into the Personal Worldviews of Candidates for Political Office,” Public Affairs Quarterly vol. 34 (2020), 72-96
  19. ^ Assisting the Least Well-Off: An Essay on Human Rights, Information Structures, and the Value of Intercity Partnerships” Review of Contemporary Philosophy, vol. 11 (2012), 72-91
  20. ^ “What We Owe the Global Poor: In Defense of a Moderate Principle of Sacrifice” International Journal of Applied Philosophy vol. 27 (Fall 2013), 251-263, https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=ijap&id=ijap_2013_0027_0002_0251_0263
  21. ^ “Theories, Facts, and Meanings in Political Philosophy” (with Guido Pincione), Philosophers’ Imprint, vol. 24 (2024): 1-14
  22. ^ “The Rationality of Political Experimentation,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics, vol. 20 (2021), 67-98
[edit]

Official website