Draft:Genemod
 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,785 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 2 December 2024 by Significa liberdade (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 21 November 2024 by 1AmNobody24 (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by 1AmNobody24 44 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 19 November 2024 by Qcne (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Qcne 46 days ago. | |
Comment: This article will need to be rewritten to provide a neutral point of view. Additionally, you will need to find reliable, secondary sources to prove that the company is notable according to Wikipedia's guidelines. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:32, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
| Industry | Biotechnology Software |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 |
| Founders | Jacob Lee, Jin Choe |
| Headquarters | Seattle, Washington, United States |
| Website | genemod |
Genemod Corporation is a biotechnology software company specializing in the development of cloud-based Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS) for life sciences research. Founded with the mission to accelerate scientific discovery through innovative technologies, Genemod provides tools to streamline laboratory workflows, enhance data management, and foster collaboration among researchers.[1][2]
Genemod was founded in 2018 by Jacob Lee, Ph.D., and Jin Choe, who identified the need for improved efficiency and collaboration in biological research. The company initially focused on developing an intuitive platform to simplify laboratory inventory management and has since expanded its product offerings to include a suite of collaboration tools, including an Electronic Lab Notebook (ELN).
Today, Genemod offers a comprehensive LIMS platform with features such as an Electronic Lab Notebook (ELN), Protocols Management, Inventory Management, Consumables Management, Order Management, Inventory Stock Tracker, Advanced Search, and Equipment Management.[3]
Genemod collaborates with leading enterprise pharmaceutical companies such as AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Bayer, as well as academic institutions and departments at prestigious universities like Harvard and Stanford.[4]
References
[edit]- ^ "About Us".
- ^ "Genemod lands $4.5M for life sciences data storage and collaboration platform". Geekwire. 5 May 2023.
- ^ "Genemod Review 2025: Pricing, Features, Pros & Cons, Ratings & More". Research.com. 19 July 2024.
- ^ "Best LIMS Software in 2025 – Top Laboratory Information Management Systems". Research.com. 2 June 2022.
External links
[edit]- Draft articles on business and economics
- Draft articles on STEM
- AfC submissions on organisations existing today
- Pending AfC submissions
- AfC pending submissions by age/2 days ago
- AfC submissions with the same name as existing articles
- AfC submissions by date/02 January 2025
- AfC submissions by date/02 December 2024
- AfC submissions by date/21 November 2024
- AfC submissions by date/19 November 2024
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.