Draft:Florida school curriculum controversy
Draft article not currently submitted for review.
This is a draft Articles for creation (AfC) submission. It is not currently pending review. While there are no deadlines, abandoned drafts may be deleted after six months. To edit the draft click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. To be accepted, a draft should:
It is strongly discouraged to write about yourself, your business or employer. If you do so, you must declare it. Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Last edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) 3 months ago. (Update) |
In 2023, Florida's public school curriculum faced significant controversy, largely centered on changes proposed by the state's Department of Education[1]. These changes, part of a broader educational reform initiative, focused on revising how certain historical events and concepts were taught. Critics argued that the new curriculum, particularly in the areas of African American history and LGBTQ+ issues, was designed to minimize or distort the portrayal of these topics, leading to accusations of censorship and historical revisionism.[2]
One of the most contentious aspects was the alteration of how slavery and its impacts were presented.[3] The revised curriculum included controversial language and perspectives that critics felt downplayed the severity and consequences of slavery. Additionally, the changes to LGBTQ+ content were seen as overly restrictive, with opponents claiming they stifled important discussions about identity and diversity in the classroom.[4]
Supporters of the reform, including state officials and some parents, argued that the changes were intended to ensure educational content aligned more closely with state values and parental concerns. They contended that the revisions were not about erasing history but rather about providing a more balanced view that also respects different perspectives and community standards.
The debate over the curriculum sparked broader discussions about educational autonomy, state control, and the role of schools in addressing complex social issues. As the controversy unfolded, it became a focal point in the national conversation about educational content and the influence of political and social agendas on public education.[5]
References
[edit]- ^ Najarro, Ileana (2023-08-16). "What's With All the Education News Out of Florida? A Recap of Education Policy Decisions". Education Week. ISSN 0277-4232. Retrieved 2024-08-31.
- ^ News, A. B. C. "Florida teachers, parents push back against DeSantis' controversial Black history curriculum change with rallies, tours". ABC News. Retrieved 2024-08-31.
{{cite web}}
:|last=
has generic name (help) - ^ "DeSantis is defending new slavery teachings. Civil rights leaders see a pattern of 'policy violence'". AP News. 2023-07-27. Retrieved 2024-08-31.
- ^ Wagner, John (2023-07-28). "Tim Scott rebukes 2024 GOP rival Ron DeSantis over Florida curriculum on slavery". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2024-08-31.
- ^ Ujifusa, Andrew (2022-02-10). "How Politics Are Straining Parent-School Relationships". Education Week. ISSN 0277-4232. Retrieved 2024-08-31.