Draft:Extreme Contexts
| Submission declined on 25 September 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Extreme Contexts
An extreme context is a situation characterized by great uncertainty, risk, and complexity, often requiring alternative approaches as traditional methods may not be adequate.[1][2]. In these scenarios, people, businesses, and nations are often pushed to adapt rapidly, demonstrating resilience and the ability to adjust [1][2].
Examples of extreme contexts include wars and pandemics, which provoke durable effects, demand immediate responses, require intense resource allocation, and drive innovations to mitigate their impact [1][2]
- ^ a b c Mahmoud, A. B.; Berman, A.; Grigoriou, N.; Solakis, K. (2023). "Investigating gender as a moderator of extreme-context perception effects on behavioural tendencies towards fashion brands on Instagram in West Africa". Journal of Marketing Communications: 1–23. doi:10.1080/13527266.2023.2278058.
- ^ a b c Mahmoud, A. B.; Berman, A.; Reisel, W.; Fuxman, L.; Hack-Polay, D. (2024). "Examining generational differences as a moderator of extreme-context perception and its impact on work alienation organizational outcomes: Implications for the workplace and remote work transformation". Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 65 (1): 70–85. doi:10.1111/sjop.12955.