Draft:Architectural risk
| Submission declined on 14 August 2024 by Utopes (talk). Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Architectural risk[1] refers to the risk of the architecture (e.g. buildings architecture, Organizational architecture, |systems architecture (including hardware architecture and |software architecture within which processes are designed, deployed and implemented either
- being not suitable to address the required qualities of the processes to be deployed within the architecture, or
- not implementing architectural strategies through which these qualities of service are realized.
References
[edit]- ^ Cui, Weilong; Sherwood, Tomothy (May 2018). "Architectural Risk". IEEE Micro. 38 (3): 116–125. doi:10.1109/MM.2018.032271068.