Draft:"the dumbass epidemic ruining YT shorts"
Submission declined on 9 December 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
The video "The Dumbass Epidemic Ruining YouTube Shorts" by Javeus, uploaded on November 17, 2024 on youtube, provided a critical analysis of the current trends dominating YouTube Shorts. Javeus expresses concern over the platform's declining content quality, highlighting specific patterns and behaviors he finds problematic.
He begins by discussing "Trollface edits," a trend involving poorly designed graphics and memes applied to various scenarios, including real-life events. He particularly criticizes an example that references a murder case, arguing that such content demonstrates a lack of respect and decency. He notes that these edits often lack coherence or purpose, serving only as shallow attempts to attract attention.
Javeus also examines the trend of exaggerated and nonsensical comments commonly found under shorts. These comments, often written in overly dramatic or "edgy" tones, are criticized for being juvenile and contributing little to meaningful discourse. He highlights their repetitiveness and questions their value, suggesting they are posted largely for attention or algorithmic engagement.
The critique extends to reaction-style shorts where creators stare blankly at videos without adding meaningful commentary. Javeus describes this trend as unproductive and, in some cases, unsettling, noting that such content neither entertains nor informs viewers. He underscores the lack of originality in these reaction videos, as many creators recycle the same format and contribute little creativity.
Another focal point is the prevalence of overly loud funk music in shorts, which Javeus describes as unnecessarily disruptive and a poor stylistic choice. He critiques the tendency of creators to use extreme volume to grab attention, suggesting it detracts from the overall quality of the content.
Javeus further critiques random and nonsensical Minecraft shorts, emphasizing their lack of coherence and their reliance on repetitive humor. He draws attention to the copy-paste nature of certain comments under these videos, noting how they perpetuate a cycle of low-effort engagement.
Finally, the video addresses the trend of poorly constructed "comebacks" in comments and videos. Javeus argues that many of these lack originality and are emblematic of a broader issue: the platform's embrace of low-effort, attention-seeking content. He views this as a symptom of the declining standards on YouTube Shorts.
In summary, Javeus provides a thorough critique of YouTube Shorts, highlighting specific issues such as repetitive content, shallow engagement tactics, and a lack of creativity. He calls for higher standards among creators and viewers, emphasizing the need for thoughtful and engaging contributions to the platform. The video serves as a broader commentary on the challenges of maintaining quality in an algorithm-driven environment, underscoring the idea that "content is only as good as the effort behind it."[1][2]
References
[edit]- ^ javeus (2024-11-17). the dumbass epidemic ruining YT shorts. Retrieved 2024-12-09 – via YouTube.
- ^ "javeus". YouTube. Retrieved 2024-12-09.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.