Cultural Office of Cluny
| Cultural Office of Cluny | |
|---|---|
| Classification | Roman Catholic |
| Region | France |
| Founder | Olivier Fenoy |
| Origin | 1963 France and other countries |
| Official website | www.officeculturelcluny.org/ |
The Cultural Office of Cluny, often named OCC (renamed Cultural Office of Cluny – National Federation of Total Animation [OCC – FNAG] in 1978) is a Catholic-related association registered as a voluntary association, created in France by Olivier Fenoy in 1963. It is a group of cultural animation composed of a theater company whose activities include art, cultural travels, and photography among other things. Although primarily located in France, the OCC has several centers in Québec and Chile.[1] The group was widely referred to as a cult in the media, particularly after the publication of the first parliamentary report in which it was mentioned.
History and organization
[edit]Strongly influenced by a text of Pius XII sent to artists in 1952 and Marthe Robin,[2] Olivier Fenoy created and developed the OCC alongside Grégoire Molle. The name comes from a café in the Quartier Latin, "Le Petit Cluny", where the founders organized their first meetings and therefore has no connection with the Abbey of Cluny. In 1973, "the community of Cluny" or "missionaries of hope" was created by hundreds of people who wanted to permanently live this lifestyle.[3] The charter accompanying the association's statutes requires to members celibacy and chastity. Postulants, novices, and engaged must give their goods to the community.[4] The first artistic creation of the group was "Un Caprice" by Alfred de Musset.[2] Students centers were quickly created. The OCC has acutellement about ten centers throughout France (Palis, Entrevaux, Château de Machy, Center Le Brûlaire, etc...). It publishes a quarterly magazine named Le Courrier: Nouvelles de Cluny.[1]
In 1972, the Secretary of State for Youth and Sports granted to the OCC a provisional approval as an organization of popular education. This approval was withdrawn in 1982, then reinstated by the State Council in 1990.[5]
Reception
[edit]The OCC was listed as a cult in the 1995 and 1999 parliamentary reports and considered as a "pseudo-Catholic" and a "medium-sized cult" in terms of wealth (its annual budget reached between 5 and 20 million francs at the time). The commission accused the OCC of trying to infiltrate the world of childhood through a formula of courses and seminars in the field of leisure, but also academic support and cultural development.[6][7] Anti-cult association ADFI criticized the OCC for its methods of seduction, its particular lifestyle (reduced sleep, long prayers, inability to be alone, etc.), possible families breakdowns, its hierarchical structure,[1] psychological pressures, and despoilment.[8] Former members claimed to have been "seduced by promises of social advancement" in the group and then were "totally ruined after their stay at the centers in Claux and Le Machy".[9] The OCC rules were described as "binding and totalitarian".[10]
For their part, Bishop of Troyes Gérard Daucourt, as well as Bishops Montagrin, Pontier, and Jean Vernette,[11] criticized the cult classification of the OCC and wrote a protest letter to Philippe Séguin, arguing that this caused some harm to the OCC as well as to the Catholic Church.[12][13] For André-Hubert Mesnard, the classification made by the Parliamentary Commission was not democratic because the list could not be changed after its publication and thus the groups incriminated, including the OCC, could not defend themselves against criticisms.[14] CESNUR stated that the group was "nearly bankrupted due to the refusal of public theatres to air its shows" after its cult designation.[15]
Judicial cases
[edit]The OCC launched numerous lawsuits or have been sued in many cases throughout its history.[1] The first ones were in 1980: the OCC was sued on material issues in Digne and Aix-en-Provence. On these occasions, Fenoy's brother, former followers, parents' members, and a priest from Lyon provided negative testimonies about the association.[5]
On 4 June 1998, the court of Angers, then on 4 November 1999, the Court of Appeal of Angers dismissed an OCC lawsuit which said that its leaders were lay monks and therefore not under the social security regulations, and tried to challenge the tax recovery imposed by URSSAF.[16] In a lawsuit filed by a former member in Grenoble, it was revealed that Fenoy had homosexual intercourse and that he "kept members in a high material and spiritual dependency". In 1988, the OCC filed a complaint for defamation against the President of the association "L'Alouette" for issuing a leaflet warning against cults in which the OCC was cited, but was dismissed.[4]
The General Councils of several French départements, including Rhône and Aube, and the Grenoble city hall gave important subsidies, which raised much criticism.[17]
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d UNADFI (1993). "Heurs et malheurs de l'Office Culturel de Cluny". Bulletin de Liaison pour l'Étude des Sectes (in French). Prevensectes. Archived from the original on 11 December 2008. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
- ^ a b Landron, Olivier (2004). Les communautés nouvelles – Nouveaux visages du catholicisme français (in French). Paris: Cerf. pp. 118–19. ISBN 2-204-07305-9.
- ^ Vernette, Jean; Moncelon, Claire (1995). "Office culturel de Cluny (OCC)". Dictionnaire des groupes religieux aujourd'hui (religions – églises – sectes – nouveaux mouvements religieux – mouvements spiritualistes) (in French). SOS Dérives sectaires. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
- ^ a b Fouchereau, Bruno (1996). La mafia des sectes – Du rapport de l'Assemblée Nationale aux implications des multinationales (in French). Filipacchi editions. pp. 96–103. ISBN 2-85018-648-1.
- ^ a b Landron, Olivier (2004). Les communautés nouvelles – Nouveaux visages du catholicisme français (in French). Paris: Cerf. pp. 428–30. ISBN 2-204-07305-9.
- ^ "Rapport fait au nom de la Commission d'enquête sur les sectes – Les sectes en France" (in French). Assemblée Nationale. 1995. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
- ^ "Rapport fait au nom de la Commission d'enquête sur les sectes – Les sectes et l'argent" (in French). Assemblée Nationale. 1999. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
- ^ Plana, Sandrine (2006). Le prosélytisme religieux à l'épreuve du droit privé (in French). Harmattan. p. 328. ISBN 9782296008250.
- ^ Huckel, Roland (May 1991). "Étude technologique de la manipulation mentale, pratiquée dans les sectes contestées". Bouée (in French). Anti-scientologie. Archived from the original on 18 October 2005. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
- ^ Le Tallec, Cyril (2006). Les sectes politiques: 1965–1995 (in French). Harmattan. p. 109. ISBN 9782296003477.
- ^ Trouslard, Jacques (2005). "Quelques réflexions relatives à l'article du journal La Croix sur les sectes" (in French). Psychothérapie Vigilance. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
- ^ Mesnard, André-Hubert (1997). "L'Office culturel de Cluny et le rapport". Pour en finir avec les sectes – Le débat sur le rapport de la commission parlementaire (in French). CESNUR – Di Giovanni. pp. 327–34. ISBN 88-85237-11-8.
- ^ Chantin, Jean-Pierre (2004). Des "sectes" dans la France contemporaine: 1905-2000, contestations ou innovations religieuses? (in French). Privat. p. 127. ISBN 9782708968554.
- ^ Bayard, Jean-Pierre (2004). Guide sur les sectes et les sociétés secrètes (in French). Philippe Lebaud editions. p. 345. ISBN 2-84898-039-7.
- ^ Introvigne, Massimo (1 December 1997). "Religious Liberty in Western Europe". CESNUR. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
- ^ UNADFI (1999). "Les moines laïques condamnés". Bulletin de Liaison pour l'Étude des Sectes (in French). Prevensectes. Archived from the original on 18 May 2007. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
- ^ "Quand l'Europe finance une secte". L'Express (in French). Prevensectes. 6 August 1998. Archived from the original on 4 April 2009. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
External links
[edit]- (in French) Official site