Jump to content

Cranleigh line

Route map:
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cranleigh line
Overview
StatusClosed
LocaleSurrey, West Sussex
Termini
Stations6
Service
TypeHeavy rail
ServicesGuildfordHorsham
History
Opened2 October 1865
Closed14 June 1965
Technical
Line length15 mi 48 ch (25.1 km)
Number of tracks1
Track gauge1,435 mm (4 ft 8+12 in) standard gauge
ElectrificationNone
Route map
Map
Guildford
Bramley & Wonersh
Cranleigh
Baynards
Baynards Tunnel
Rudgwick
Double bridge over River Arun
Slinfold
Horsham
Christ's Hospital
For clarity, not all lines north of Guildford and north of Horsham are shown. The tunnels south of Guildford on the Portsmouth Direct line are also omitted.

The Cranleigh line was a railway line in South East England that connected Guildford in Surrey, with Horsham in West Sussex. It ran for 15 miles 48 chains (25.1 km) from Peasmarsh Junction on the Portsmouth Direct line to Stammerham Junction at Christ's Hospital station on the Arun Valley line. It served the villages of Bramley, Cranleigh, Rudgwick and Slinfold. The line was never electrified and was single track with passing loops at Bramley & Wonersh, Cranleigh and Baynards stations.

Construction of the line was started in 1860 by the independent Horsham and Guildford Direct Railway, which was acquired by the London, Brighton and South Coast Railway (LB&SCR) in June 1864. The line opened on 2 October 1865, although remedial works to ease the gradient north of the River Arun crossing delayed the opening of Rudgwick station until the following month. Christ's Hospital station was opened on 1 May 1902.

The railway was never financially successful and there were never more than nine return passenger services on weekdays. Freight services were suspended during the 1955 railway workers' strike and never recovered thereafter. The public goods yards closed in October 1962. The line was listed for closure in the 1963 Beeching report, and passenger services were withdrawn on 14 June 1965.

Platforms remain in situ at Bramley & Wonersh, Baynards and Christ's Hospital, but the stations at Cranleigh, Rudgwick and Slinfold were demolished. The 381 yd long (348 m) Baynards Tunnel, where the line crossed the county boundary between Surrey and West Sussex, was bricked up at both ends and the cutting on the north side was infilled. Much of the route now forms part of the Downs Link path, which connects the North Downs Way at St Martha's Hill to the South Downs Way near Shoreham-by-Sea.

Route

[edit]

The Cranleigh line was a standard-gauge railway line in South East England. It ran for 15 miles 48 chains (25.1 km) from Peasmarsh Junction on the Portsmouth Direct line to Stammerham Junction at Christ's Hospital station on the Arun Valley line.[1] The line was single track throughout and, on its opening in 1865, there was only one passing loop at Baynards station, the approximate half-way point.[2][3] Additional passing loops were added at Bramley & Wonersh and Cranleigh stations in 1876 and 1880 respectively.[3][4]

By the end of 1865, there were six operational stations on the line—at Bramley & Wonersh, Cranleigh, Baynards, Rudgwick and Slinfold. Initially only Baynards had two platforms, with the remainder having only one each. Bramley & Wonersh and Cranleigh each gained a second platform when their passing loops were installed.[3][4] Christ's Hospital station opened in 1902 to serve the school of the same name and an expected local housing development.[5][6][7] It was provided with five platform roads and seven platform faces, of which two roads and three faces served the Cranleigh line.[6][8] The route was never electrified, although an outline proposal to install third rail on the section north of Cranleigh was put forward by the Southern Railway in the early 1930s.[9]

An SR USA class tank engine turns onto the Cranleigh line at Peasmarsh Junction in 1964.

The Cranleigh line diverged from the Portsmouth Direct line at Peasmarsh Junction, around 1+34 mi (2.8 km) south of Guildford station, on a 14 mi (0.40 km) curve with a maximum radius of 12 chains (790 ft; 240 m).[10][11] When it opened, the junction was controlled by a signal box operated by the London and South Western Railway (LSWR) and had two diverging tracks, which merged into one at a second signal box, operated by the London, Brighton and South Coast Railway (LB&SCR).[12] In 1926, Peasmarsh Junction was altered to a single lead, allowing the abolition of the LB&SCR box, with the former LSWR box controlling all movements between the branch and the main line.[8]

The former triangular junction between the Cranleigh line and the Arun Valley line (upper centre)

At Stammerham Junction, the Cranleigh line diverged from the Arun Valley line via a 12 mi (0.80 km) west–north curve with a maximum radius of 26 chains (1,700 ft; 520 m).[11] On opening in 1865, a west–south spur was also provided, sometimes called the "Itchingfield South Fork", which allowed trains to run from Guildford to the south coast without the need for a reversal.[11] No regular scheduled services were timetabled over the spur and the track had been lifted by August 1867.[13][14] The embankment over which the Itchingfield South Fork ran was levelled by ploughing in the mid-20th century and its course is only visible as a field boundary and drainage ditch.[14]

On opening, the Cranleigh line crossed two navigable waterways. The Godalming Navigation, the stretch of the River Wey between Guildford and Godalming, was crossed at Peasmarsh. The Wey and Arun Canal, which the line paralleled from Peasmarsh to Cranleigh, was crossed on a iron girder viaduct at Whipley Manor.[15] The Wey bridge was demolished when the line closed, but was reinstated in July 2006 for the use of cyclists and pedestrians.[16][17]

The line crossed the county boundary from Surrey to West Sussex inside the 381 yd long (348 m) Baynards Tunnel, also called "Rudgwick Tunnel".[18][19] It was built on a downhill gradient of 1 in 100 from north to south[18] and suffered from condensation and water ingress. Locomotives frequently experienced poor railhead conditions and there are several reports of freight trains being brought to a stand inside the tunnel, due to wheel slippage.[19][20][21]

The original intention was for the unnavigable River Arun to be crossed by a brick arch bridge, but an inspection carried out before the line opened, determined that the 1 in 80 gradient on the southern approach to Rudgwick station was too steep for trains to operate safely. The gradient was eased to 1 in 130 by raising the embankment, requiring a second, plate-girder deck to be installed 10 ft (3.0 m) above the original brick arch. The works delayed the opening of Rudgwick station by one month.[22][23]

By 1911, signal boxes were in operation at all six stations on the Cranleigh line.[24][25] South of Baynards, the line was worked using the staff and ticket system, but the northern part of the line used electric tokens instead.[26][27]

Stations on the Cranleigh line (ordered from north to south)
Station Distance from
Horsham[21][28]
Number of platform
roads in 1965
Opening date Original name Ref.
Bramley & Wonersh 16 mi 15 ch (26.1 km) 2
(originally 1)
2 October 1865 Bramley [29]
Cranleigh 11 mi 19 ch (18.1 km) 2
(originally 1)
2 October 1865 Cranley [30]
Baynards 8 mi 27 ch (13.4 km) 2 2 October 1865 [31]
Rudgwick 7 mi 9 ch (11.4 km) 1 1 November 1865 [32]
Slinfold 4 mi 67 ch (7.8 km) 1 2 October 1865 [33]
Christ's Hospital 2 mi 31 ch (3.8 km) 4
(2 for Cranleigh line)
1 May 1902 Christ's Hospital West Horsham [5]

History

[edit]

Proposals and authorisation

[edit]

The first proposal to link Horsham to Guildford by rail was presented to the board of the London and South Western Railway (LSWR) in September 1846, but the company declined to support the initiative.[34][a] Over a decade later, in the summer of 1859, two separate schemes to link west Surrey and north-west Sussex were put forward. The first, promoted by an independent company, was to link Guildford and Horsham, while the second, conceived by a group associated with the Wey and Arun Canal, sought to link Guildford to Pulborough.[36] The latter scheme failed to make progress, but by February 1860, the increasing likelihood of the Guildford–Horsham line being constructed prompted the London, Brighton and South Coast Railway (LB&SCR) to oppose it, fearing that it would allow the LSWR to compete for traffic from Sussex to London.[36]

In spite of the LB&SCR's initial opposition, the promoters of the Guildford–Horsham scheme offered the company the rights to work the new line.[37] The arrangement was formally agreed on 21 June 1860 and, less than two months later, on 6 August, the Horsham and Guildford Direct Railway Act 1860 (23 & 24 Vict. c. clxxx) was granted royal assent.[26][36][38] The act allowed the LB&SCR to contribute up to £75,000 (equivalent to £8.9 million in 2023) to the capital requirements of the new line, which was to be built by the Horsham and Guildford Direct Railway (HGDR) company.[38]

Later that year, the HGDR submitted a proposal to Parliament, requesting the right to work over the line between Woking and Godalming, which the LSWR opposed.[39] Following negotiations concluded on 7 May 1861, the HGDR withdrew its bill, agreeing not to seek rights to run beyond Guildford. In exchange, the LSWR granted access to Guildford station, on the condition that the HGDR paid a proportion of the cost of providing any additional platforms required for its services.[34]

Over the next three years, the LB&SCR began to exert increasing control of the HGDR. Three new directors of the HGDR were appointed on 8 March 1862, all of whom had an existing connection to the LB&SCR. Robert Jacomb-Hood, the Chief Engineer of the LB&SCR was invited to take up the same position at the HGDR and, on 28 April that year, the company administration was transferred to the LB&SCR's offices.[40] The two companies were formally amalgamated under the London, Brighton and South Coast Railway (additional powers) Act 1864 (27 & 28 Vict. c. cccxiv), with the merger taking effect on 29 June that year.[38][41]

Construction and opening

[edit]

The slow progress of agreeing access to Guildford station with the LSWR, delayed the start of the construction of the Cranleigh line. An initial survey of the route was completed by Edward Woods, who had been appointed Company Engineer by the HGDR in July 1860.[42] Several changes were made to his scheme, including the construction of Baynards Tunnel, which was originally to have been a deep cutting. The board of directors was informed on 27 February 1862 that construction contracts had been let. Robert Jacomb-Hood produced a second survey for the line that April, and Woods left the HGDR at around the same time.[43]

The construction of the route was overseen by Frederick Bannister, who was also an engineer working for the LB&SCR. On 12 February 1863, he raised concerns over slow progress and the following month he noted that the necessary land for the route between Guildford and Cranleigh had not yet been purchased.[43] Nevertheless, track laying had begun by January 1864 and in the same month, the contract for the construction of the five stations was awarded to John Perry for the cost of £3,698 (£459000 in 2023).[43]

The bridge over the River Arun south of Rudgwick station

As the line was nearing completion, an inspection was undertaken by the Board of Trade (BoT). Although the LB&SCR had hoped to begin public passenger services by 1 June 1865, the opening was delayed several times due to unfinished work.[44] The new railway finally opened on 2 October 1865, but William Yolland, the BoT representative charged with inspecting the route, insisted that Rudgwick station was to remain closed until the steep gradient of 1 in 80 to the south was eased.[27][44] The work required included the raising of embankments and a second bridge deck was added 10 ft (3.0 m) above the original brick arch over the River Arun, reducing the gradient to 1 in 130. Rudgwick station opened in November 1865, although the precise date is unknown.[22][23][45]

In his inspection reports, Yolland had also expressed dissatisfaction with the method of working for Cranleigh line trains at Guildford. A plan to enlarge Guildford station was agreed between the LB&SCR and LSWR on 24 October 1865;[44] the LB&SCR also committed to pay the latter a proportion of its gross receipts for operating over the 1+34 mi (2.8 km) stretch of line north of Peasmarsh Junction.[34] However, over the next few years, disagreements over the LB&SCR's access rights grew. A permanent settlement was not reached until the late 1880s, when the company undertook to pay the LSWR an additional £600 per annum (equivalent to £87700 in 2023), effective from January 1889.[46]

Late 19th century

[edit]

The initial passenger service in each direction on the Cranleigh line was four trains per day on weekdays in each direction and two trains on Sundays,[47][48] but in October 1867, the timetable was reduced to only three return trains on weekdays.[49]

North of Cranleigh, the line paralleled the Wey and Arun Canal.[15] The waterway, which had opened on 29 September 1816, linking the two rivers in its name, had been intended to provide a navigable inland route between London and the English Channel.[50] For the most part, it was used for the transport coal and agricultural produced, and through traffic from the capital to the south coast was negligible.[51] Within four years of the waterway opening, the share price for the canal company had fallen to half its initial value, and dividends dropped from £1 per share in 1828 to 5s in 1852.[52] There was a short-term increase in income from tolls during the construction of the Cranleigh line, when the canal was used to transport building materials for the railway.[52] However, once the new route had opened, the waterway became unprofitable and gross receipts were reduced by 50%.[53] The final dividend, 6 s per share, was paid in 1865,[52] and the following year, the board recommended that the canal company should be liquidated.[54] The closure proposal was contested not only by the waterway's shareholders, but also by the adjoining Godalming and Arun Navigation companies.[55] Under the terms of the Wey and Arun Junction Canal (Abandonment) Act 1868, the canal was formally abandoned on 22 July 1871.[56]

Bramley & Wonersh station in 1961

Passing loops and second platforms were installed at Bramley & Wonersh and Cranleigh stations in 1876 and 1880 respectively.[3][4] The additional loops allowed to seven trains per day to operate in each direction in the early 1880s,[3] although the February 1890 timetable shows that the service had been reduced to five trains per day in each direction between Horsham and Guildford, with a single short return working between Horsham and Cranleigh.[57] Two schools, Cranleigh School and St Catherine's School, Bramley, were established in villages served by the line in 1865 and 1885 respectively.[21][58]

Two schemes for new railways serving Cranleigh were put forward at the end of the 19th century. Under the provisions of the Light Railways Act 1896, a line linking Ockley and Selham (near Midhurst) was proposed, but failed to attract support. Between 1897 and 1899, various routes for a branch from the Dorking and Holmwood areas to Cranleigh were suggested, but the railways were opposed by local residents, who feared that the LB&SCR was using the new schemes to block competition from the rival LSWR.[59][60][61]

Early 20th century

[edit]
Christ's Hospital station c. 1910

The construction of Christ's Hospital school at the southern end of the line began in 1897, when the foundation stone was laid in a ceremony on 22 October by the future Edward VIII, then Prince of Wales.[62] The school was to relocate from Newgate, London, where it had been founded in 1552. The Sussex site had previously been the 1,200-acre (490 ha) Aylesbury Dairy Farm, which had closed after the owner had declared bankruptcy.[63] The LB&SCR, which anticipated that there would be a large number of pupils travelling to the school every day, constructed new platforms at Stammerham Junction, where the Cranleigh line joined the Arun Valley line.[64] The company also hoped to attract housing development to the area, and accordingly named the station "Christ's Hospital West Horsham".[6][b] The new station, which had separate platforms for the two lines, opened on 1 May 1902.[5][64] On 29 May, 800 pupils arrived by train to begin their education at the Sussex site.[66][7] However, little additional rail traffic was generated for the railway, as the governors of Christ's Hospital elected to enrol boarders only and to not admit day pupils.[64]

In 1911, a new signal box was installed at Rudgwick, replacing the earlier signalling hut that had controlled access to the goods yard.[25] The Sunday service on the line was withdrawn between 1917 and 1919 as a wartime economy measure.[60] The former LB&SCR signal box at Peasmarsh was closed in 1926, when the double-track junction with the Portsmouth Direct line was converted to a single-lead junction with a crossover.[8] Competition for the railway, in the form of a new bus service running between Guildford and Horsham, began on 9 April 1923.[67] In the late 1930s, the northern part of the line was proposed for electrification, to allow London Waterloo to Guildford via Cobham & Stoke d'Abernon services to be extended to Cranleigh.[9][68]

Mid-20th century

[edit]

During the Second World War, the line was available as an alternative route to the main lines from London and the Midlands to the South Coast, and signal boxes were staffed 24 hours a day to allow for emergency diversions.[68][69] An ammunitions depot and an army camp for US forces, both served by rail, were established at Baynards Park.[68][69] On 16 September 1942, eight people were killed when an enemy aircraft attacked a passenger train near Bramley & Wonersh station.[70][71]

Baynards station in 1961

In the 1940s and 1950s, Baynards was used as a location for films and television. The station appeared in the 1942 comedy, The Black Sheep of Whitehall,[72] and the 1945 melodrama, They Were Sisters.[27] Extensive use of the railway was made by the 1957 BBC television series, The Railway Children, based on the novel of the same name by E. Nesbit. Several sequences used an LSWR T9 class locomotive, which did not otherwise run on the line.[73] Later filming at Baynards station included scenes for The Horsemasters (1961),[74][c] The Grass is Greener (1960),[9] and Die, Monster, Die! (1965).[72] Scenes for the 1965 comedy, Rotten to the Core, were filmed in the Cranleigh line platforms at Christ's Hospital, using an N class locomotive, which was otherwise prohibited on the route.[75][d]

An LSWR M7 class locomotive at Cranleigh station in 1957

Developments on the Cranleigh line in the early 1950s included the introduction of railmotors, consisting of tank engines coupled to a type of passenger carriage, known as a balloon trailer. The train would be driven from the locomotive in one direction and, in the other, from a driving position at the front of the carriage.[8] The 1953 timetable included eight services in each direction on the full length of the line on weekdays, with an additional early evening return from Guildford to Cranleigh,[12] but the services were poorly timed for convenient connections at Guildford and Horsham.[68]

All passenger services on the line were suspended during the strike by members of the Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen in mid-1955.[68] Freight traffic never recovered and the daily goods train serving Cranleigh Yard was withdrawn on 10 September 1962.[8][68] Sunday passenger services were suspended from 8 November 1959 and were never reinstated.[76] Horsham shed formally closed in June 1959, but the steam locomotives operating on the Cranleigh line continued to be serviced there until maintenance was transferred to Guildford shed on 15 June 1964.[8]

Closure

[edit]

The first Beeching report, published in 1963, recommended withdrawing all passenger services and the closure of all stations between Bramley & Wonersh and Slinfold inclusive.[77][78] By this time, the line was running at a loss of £46,000 per year (equivalent to £1.22 million in 2023), and was being used by fewer than 5000 passengers each week.[9] The official notice of closure was published by the British Railways Board that September, giving 11 November 1963 as the provisional date from which no trains would run. The board noted that the existing bus services, serving all settlements on the line except Baynards, would continue to run after the railway had closed.[79][80]

A local campaign was launched, resulting in the postponement of the closure. Suggestions were made that a privately operated service could run on the northern part of the line using diesel trains.[81] A public inquiry took place in Cranleigh on 10 March 1964, during which objectors noted that a planned programme of housebuilding would increase the village population by around 5000.[82] In March the following year, the Minister of Transport ruled that the line should close on the condition that additional bus services were commissioned. Monday 14 June 1965 was given as the date from which no trains would run.[83]

Since no Sunday service had operated on the Cranleigh line since November 1959,[76] the final day of operation of public services on the line was Saturday 12 June 1965. The last train to depart from Christ's Hospital station was serenaded by boys from the school singing Abide with Me. An enthusiasts' special, which ran the full length of the route on Sunday 13 June 1965, was the final passenger train to operate on the Cranleigh line.[84][85]

After closure

[edit]

The Horsham and Guildford Direct Railway Society (HGDRS) was formed in August 1965, with the aim of operating an hourly service on the line on weekdays. The group approached British Railways with an offer to lease the line for a period of five years, after which they would purchase it outright. Additional halts were to be built at Grafham and Shamley Green, and tickets were to be sold on the trains.[86] British Railways refused to lease the line to the society, but instead offered to sell the whole railway, including the freehold for the stations, for £240,000. Surrey County Council and Hambledon Rural District Council, which had been in favour of the reopening project, withdrew their support for the HGDRS scheme at the end of 1965.[87]

Over the next few months, the track was lifted and, in April 1965, permission was given for the station site at Cranleigh to be used for the Stocklund Square shopping development and its associated car park.[88][89][90] The station footbridge was removed and re-erected at Liss station.[8] In 1969, Surrey County Council purchased much of the route north of Baynards, with the intention of converting it into a public highway.[91]

The station building at Bramley & Wonersh was demolished,[92] but the platforms were restored and replica level crossing gates were installed in a two-year project, completed in 2005.[93] Since then, the station site has been part of the Bramley Conservation Area.[94] The viaduct over the River Wey was dismantled,[16][17] although the double bridge over the River Arun was left intact.[95] Rudgwick and Slinfold stations were demolished and their sites are now occupied by a health centre and caravan park respectively.[96][97] Baynards station was sold in 1973 and remains in private ownership.[98][99]

Since 1990, there have been several proposals to reopen the line from Peasmarsh Junction to Cranleigh. The "Study into Rail Line Improvements in Surrey: Network South Central Operating Area", published by Surrey County Council in 1996, determined that reinstatement as a heavy-rail branch or as part of a light-rail system centred on Guildford, was feasible and would alleviate congestion on local roads.[100] Connecting Communities: Expanding Access to the Rail Network, a report published by the Association of Train Operating Companies in June 2009, assessed the capital cost of reopening this section as £63 million (equivalent to £107 million in 2023), including stations at Bramley and Cranleigh.[101][102] The Campaign for Better Transport advocacy group called for the reinstatement of the entirety of the line, following the cancellation of the "Restoring Your Railway" programme by the UK government in mid-2024.[103]

[edit]
The restored Cranleigh line platforms on the Downs Link at Christ's Hospital station

Plans to convert the trackbed of the Cranleigh line to a path for cyclists and walkers began to emerge in the early 1970s. Hambledon Rural District Council signed a seven-year lease on the part of the railway that had been purchased by Surrey County Council with the intention of creating a "greenway" between Gosden, north of Bramley, and the border with West Sussex.[104][e] The works included sealing the entrances to Baynards Tunnel with concrete blocks and filling the cutting on the northern approach with inert waste to create a ramped access to Cox Green Road.[108] A strip of land was purchased to enable the path to reach the county boundary and drainage, fencing and landscaping works were also undertaken. The total cost of £15,000 (equivalent to £229000 in 2023) was funded from the sale of Baynards station.[109]

The Downs Link, joining the North Downs Way at St Martha's Hill to the South Downs Way at St Botolph's near Shoreham-by-Sea, was formally opened on 9 July 1984 at ceremonies at Baynards Station and at the southern terminus of the new route. The path, for cyclists and walkers, was a joint project between Surrey and West Sussex County Councils, and Waverley District Council.[110][111] Although much of the former trackbed of the Cranleigh line was incorporated into the Downs Link, the sections of the railway through Peasmarsh and east of Slinfold were not initially included. The route also deviated from the original alignment in the centre of Cranleigh, following the High Street instead.[99]

The Downs Link bridge over the River Wey

In the early 21st century, two separate projects allowed the Downs Link to be extended over additional sections of the former Cranleigh line. Firstly, the demolished railway bridge over the River Wey was rebuilt in July 2006, allowing access to the path from Guildford town centre.[17] Secondly, the 0.87 mi (1.4 km) section of the trackbed west of Slinfold became part of the Downs Link in September 2020. The works, which were funded as a collaborative project between Christ's Hospital school and West Sussex County Council, included the restoration of the Cranleigh line platforms at Christ's Hospital station.[112][113]

Locomotives

[edit]

The first locomotive to work on the line was a 2-2-2 tender engine, designed by John Chester Craven and built in 1865 at Brighton works. It was based at Horsham shed until its withdrawal in May 1886.[26] From the mid-1880s, LB&SCR D1 class tank engines, designed by William Stroudley were introduced on Guildford–Horsham services. Members of this class were named Cranleigh, Rudgwick, Slinfold and Baynards after stations on the line. Two smaller LB&SCR A1 class locomotives, named Bramley and Wonersh, were based at Bramley shed.[114][115]

An SR V "Schools" class locomotive, designed by Richard Maunsell and constructed in June 1935, was named Cranleigh after Cranleigh School.[116][117] Although it never ran in passenger service on the line,[118] the locomotive was exhibited at Cranleigh station shortly after its completion.[119] An earlier SR V class locomotive, which entered passenger service in December 1932, was similarly named Christ's Hospital.[117][f]

During the inter-war period, the D1 class locomotives were replaced by LSWR M7 class tank engines, designed by Dugald Drummond,[119] working the line until January 1963.[120] SECR H class engines, capable of operating autotrains were introduced in the early 1950s, but push-pull working was eliminated from the line in mid-1961. That summer, BR Standard Class 2 2-6-2Ts and LMS Ivatt Class 2 2-6-2Ts which would operate the majority of passenger services up until closure, began working on the line.[8][121][122]

An SR Q1 class locomotive near Baynards station in 1963

Locomotives hauling goods trains in the 1960s included Type 3 diesels[123] and SR Q1 class tender engines,[84] both of which saw occasional use on passenger services.[84][124] Q1 locomotives, based at Guildford shed, were commonly used on the services from Guildford that terminated at Cranleigh.[125] The final passenger train on the line was an enthusiasts' special. It ran on Sunday 13 June 1965, the day after the last scheduled service, and was hauled by two Q1 class engines.[84][85] The following day, a locomotive completed a round trip from Horsham to Baynards to collect a train of empty goods wagons from one of the sidings.[85]

Freight

[edit]
Rudgwick goods yard, to the right of the station platform

Goods facilities had not been constructed by the time the Cranleigh line opened and it was not until 31 October 1865 that the line engineer was instructed to draw up plans for freight depots at the stations.[126] Between 1877 and 1933, coal was delivered by rail to dedicated sidings at Cranleigh gasworks.[127][128] In the late 19th century, livestock and agricultural products were transported from Baynards station via the line, including sheep from Romney Marsh, which were wintered in the area.[126][129] There was a private siding for a ladder factory at Slinfold, where there was also a brickworks.[8][130] The two other brickworks on the line, at Cranleigh and Baynards, were served by narrow-gauge railways.[131] Two sidings were provided at the north end of Bramley station, one of which was used for coal and the other for general public freight.[132] The goods yard at Rudgwick was equipped with a turntable for wagons.[133][134]

In the early 20th century, a quarry and processing facility for Fuller's earth was established on the site of the former brickworks at Baynards.[135] In 1937, it became the site of the Steetley Chemicals Company[123] and a regular supply of sulphur was delivered by rail to the plant, up until the closure of the line in 1965. An 0-4-0 tank engine from the brickworks, which was used to shunt wagons until 1949, when it was replaced by a four-wheeled Motor Rail diesel locomotive.[135] Chemicals manufacture ceased at Baynards in 1989.[123]

The 1955 rail strike prompted several of the companies that received or sent goods via the line, to transfer their operations to road haulage.[136] The line was closed to public freight on 10 October 1962.[8][137][138]

Accidents and incidents

[edit]
  • 27 August 1863: A surveyor was killed in Baynards Tunnel, while the line was under construction.[139]
  • 21 September 1866: Four passengers were injured when a passenger service from Guildford collided with a train of cattle tracks at Bramley.[140]
  • 16 September 1942: Eight people were killed when an enemy aircraft attacked a passenger train near Bramley & Wonersh station.[141][142]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ The LSWR began operating passenger services to Guildford on 5 May 1845.[35]
  2. ^ A small wooden platform had been provided at Stammerham Junction in the late 19th century to load milk churns, but had not been used after the owner of Aylesbury Dairy Farm was made bankrupt.[65]
  3. ^ Baynards station appears as "Valleywood" in the 1961 Disneyland TV show, The Horsemasters.[74]
  4. ^ Christ's Hospital station appears as "Longhampton" in the 1965 comedy, Rotten to the Core.[75]
  5. ^ On 1 April 1974, Hambledon Rural District became part of Waverley District,[105] which became the Borough of Waverley on 21 February 1984.[106][107]
  6. ^ The SR V "Schools" class locomotives Christ's Hospital and Cranleigh were withdrawn from passenger service in January and December 1962 respectively.[117]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Turner 1978, p. 147.
  2. ^ Mitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 23.
  3. ^ a b c d e Jackson 1999, p. 60.
  4. ^ a b c Welch 2001, p. 38.
  5. ^ a b c Quick 2023, p. 133.
  6. ^ a b c Oppitz 1987, p. 46.
  7. ^ a b "A Surrey–Sussex line: Horsham to Guildford – Part 1". Southern Times. No. 3. High Wycombe: Transport Treasury. Autumn 2022. pp. 70–75. ISBN 978-1-91-325134-5.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j "232: The Cranleigh line". Steam Days. No. 422. October 2024. pp. 19–35.
  9. ^ a b c d Grayer 2024, p. 3.
  10. ^ Welch 2006, p. 38.
  11. ^ a b c Turner 1978, p. 146.
  12. ^ a b Mitchell & Smith 1984, Figs 7 and 8.
  13. ^ Vine 1996, p. 177.
  14. ^ a b Buckman 2002, pp. 23–24.
  15. ^ a b Vine 1996, p. 160.
  16. ^ a b Vine 1999, p. 45.
  17. ^ a b c "Bridge over River Wey". Surrey Advertiser. No. 15784. 14 July 2006. p. 7.
  18. ^ a b Turner 1978, p. 144.
  19. ^ a b Mitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 32.
  20. ^ Grayer 2024, p. 36.
  21. ^ a b c Sillince, David (March 1966). "The Horsham & Guildford Direct" (PDF). The Railway Magazine. No. 779. pp. 127–131. Retrieved 13 January 2025.
  22. ^ a b Mitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 38.
  23. ^ a b Grayer 2024, p. 29.
  24. ^ Mitchell & Smith 1984, Figs 14, 18, 26, 39, 43, 45.
  25. ^ a b Grayer 2024, p. 33.
  26. ^ a b c Vallance, H.A. (September 1950). "The Horsham–Guildford Line, Southern Region" (PDF). The Railway Magazine. No. 593. pp. 584–587. Retrieved 22 January 2025.
  27. ^ a b c "A Surrey–Sussex line: Horsham to Guildford – Part 2". Southern Times. No. 4. High Wycombe: Transport Treasury. Winter 2023. pp. 29–39. ISBN 978-1-91-325135-2.
  28. ^ "Sectional Appendix" 2009, SO520.
  29. ^ Quick 2023, p. 97.
  30. ^ Quick 2023, p. 148.
  31. ^ Quick 2023, p. 73.
  32. ^ Quick 2023, p. 396.
  33. ^ Quick 2023, p. 419.
  34. ^ a b c Williams 1973, p. 59.
  35. ^ Williams 1968, pp. 126, 132.
  36. ^ a b c Hodd 1975, p. 7.
  37. ^ Buckman 2002, p. 22.
  38. ^ a b c Turner 1978, p. 143.
  39. ^ "Horsham and Guildford Direct Railway Amendment Act". Daily News. No. 4527. 14 November 1860. p. 2.
  40. ^ Hodd 1975, p. 11.
  41. ^ Hodd 1975, p. 12.
  42. ^ Hodd 1975, p. 13.
  43. ^ a b c Hodd 1975, pp. 14–15.
  44. ^ a b c Hodd 1975, p. 17.
  45. ^ Hodd 1975, p. 18.
  46. ^ Williams 1973, p. 61.
  47. ^ "The Horsham and Guildford Railway". Surrey Advertiser. No. 67. 30 September 1865. p. 2.
  48. ^ "Horsham and Guildford". The Times. No. 25306. London. 3 October 1865. p. 7.
  49. ^ "Guildford & Horsham Railway (LB&SCR)". Surrey Advertiser. Vol. IV, no. 175. 26 October 1867. p. 4.
  50. ^ "From the County Chronicle". The Times. No. 9955. London. 2 October 1816. p. 4.
  51. ^ Vine 1999, p. 9.
  52. ^ a b c Vine 1999, p. 11.
  53. ^ Jackson 1999, p. 61.
  54. ^ Vine 1996, p. 178.
  55. ^ Vine 1996, pp. 179, 187.
  56. ^ Vine 1999, p. 13.
  57. ^ Mitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 13.
  58. ^ "Bramley: St Catherine's Schools". The West Surrey Times. No. 1604. 26 September 1885. p. 5.
  59. ^ Grayer 2024, p. 54.
  60. ^ a b Oppitz 1988, p. 79.
  61. ^ Turner 1979, pp. 68–69.
  62. ^ "The Prince of Wales and the new Christ's Hospital". The Times. No. 35343. London. 25 October 1897. p. 13.
  63. ^ Howard & Legate 2001, p. 7.
  64. ^ a b c Mitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 44.
  65. ^ Oppitz 1987, p. 43.
  66. ^ "Christ's Hospital". The Times. No. 36781. London. 30 May 1902. p. 9.
  67. ^ Bixley, Gerry (7 April 2023) [6 April 2023]. "Marking 100 years of buses on the Guildford to Horsham route". Guildford Dragon. Retrieved 20 January 2025.
  68. ^ a b c d e f Oppitz 1988, p. 80.
  69. ^ a b Jackson 1999, p. 168.
  70. ^ Mitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 12.
  71. ^ Jackson 1999, p. 169.
  72. ^ a b Grayer 2024, p. 39.
  73. ^ Welch 2001, p. 44.
  74. ^ a b Welch 2006, p. 39.
  75. ^ a b Mitchell & Smith 1984, Figs 50 and 51.
  76. ^ a b Grayer 2024, p. 10.
  77. ^ Beeching 1963a, pp. 107, 109–112, 118–119.
  78. ^ Beeching 1963b, Map 9.
  79. ^ "Beeching axes five stations – November 11". Surrey Advertiser. No. 12308. 7 September 1963. p. 15.
  80. ^ "British Railways Board: Public Notice – Withdrawal of Railway Passenger Services". Surrey Advertiser. No. 12309. 14 September 1963. p. 2.
  81. ^ "Privately run trains on Cranleigh line? Services". Surrey Advertiser. No. 12309. 14 September 1963. pp. 1–2.
  82. ^ "'Minister should step in and stop Horsham line closure': Villagers protest and plead for five-year respite". Surrey Advertiser. No. 12335. 14 March 1964. p. 18.
  83. ^ "Commuters lose battle – Cranleigh line to close". Surrey Advertiser. No. 12, 386. 6 March 1965. p. 1.
  84. ^ a b c d Welch 2007, p. 70.
  85. ^ a b c Hodd 1975, p. 49.
  86. ^ "Commuters may save 'axed' line". Surrey Advertiser. No. 12411. 28 August 1965. pp. 1, 17.
  87. ^ "Line may cost over £240,000 to reopen". Surrey Advertiser. No. 12429. 1 January 1966. p. 1.
  88. ^ "End of a railway". Surrey Advertiser. No. 12446. 30 April 1966. p. 1.
  89. ^ Oppitz 1988, p. 81.
  90. ^ Grayer 2024, p. 51.
  91. ^ Dewhurst, Ernest (13 February 1969). "Turning railways into roads". The Guardian. p. 6.
  92. ^ White, Steven (30 December 2022). "The lost Surrey railway station that was site of World War II tragedy". Surrey Live. Retrieved 19 January 2025.
  93. ^ "Making tracks back to the past". Surrey Live. 3 July 2013 [18 February 2005]. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
  94. ^ "Bramley Conservation Area Appraisal" (PDF). Waverley Borough Council. 19 July 2005. Sections 6.24, 15.2, 16.7. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
  95. ^ Fox, Thomas (22 August 2022). "Rudgwick's bizarre two-tiered bridge found along abandoned West Sussex railway line walk". Sussex Live. Retrieved 19 January 2025.
  96. ^ Oppitz 1987, p. 48.
  97. ^ Miller 2005, p. 126.
  98. ^ "Council goes on last tour of district". Surrey Advertiser. No. 12821. 6 July 1973. p. 21.
  99. ^ a b Stanbury, Frieda (23 April 1987). "The Downs Link – A railway walk". The Lady. pp. 816–817.
  100. ^ Jackson 1999, pp. 221–222.
  101. ^ "Connecting Communities – Expanding Access to the Rail Network" (PDF). London: Association of Train Operating Companies. June 2009. pp. 16, 18. Retrieved 7 September 2018.
  102. ^ Webster, Ben (15 June 2009). "Train companies want to reopen branch lines that Beeching closed". The Times. No. 69662. London. p. 17.
  103. ^ Johnson, Thomas (23 August 2024). "Campaign calls for Restoring Your Railway alternative to reopen abandoned railway lines". New Civil Engineer. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
  104. ^ "Council votes to sign for old line". Surrey Advertiser. No. 12808. 6 April 1973. p. 1.
  105. ^ "Waverley welds historic towns in a new unity". Surrey Advertiser. No. 12950. 1 April 1974. p. S2.
  106. ^ Harlow, Amanda (6 January 1984). "Borough plan approved by the Queen". Surrey Advertiser. No. 14609. p. 1.
  107. ^ "Waverley collects its borough charter". Surrey Advertiser. No. 14615. 17 February 1984. p. 5.
  108. ^ "Hambledon Rural District Council". Surrey Advertiser. No. 12670. 14 August 1970. p. 10.
  109. ^ "£15,000 scheme for old railway line". Surrey Advertiser. No. 12834. 5 October 1973. p. 1.
  110. ^ "New Downs link for Sussex". Adur Herald. No. 3345. 13 July 1984. p. 11.
  111. ^ "Downs Link takes place of defunct railway". Cranleigh Times. No. 8917. 21 July 1984. p. 1.
  112. ^ Lock, Rose (19 September 2020). "Missing section of the Downs Link restored with help from Christ's Hospital School". The Argus. Archived from the original on 2 October 2020. Retrieved 23 January 2025.
  113. ^ "'Missing' section of Downs Link restored". Christ’s Hospital. 24 September 2020. Archived from the original on 23 January 2022.
  114. ^ Hodd 1975, pp. 35–36.
  115. ^ Morley 1994, p. 25.
  116. ^ Swift 2006, p. 14.
  117. ^ a b c Swift 2006, pp. 80–81, 87, 93.
  118. ^ Seymour & Warrington 1984, Fig. 74.
  119. ^ a b Hodd 1975, pp. 39–40.
  120. ^ Grayer 2024, p. 37.
  121. ^ Mitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 22.
  122. ^ Welch 2006, p. 41.
  123. ^ a b c Grayer 2024, p. 45.
  124. ^ Mitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 52.
  125. ^ Welch 1998, p. 23.
  126. ^ a b Hodd 1975, p. 34.
  127. ^ Jackson 1999, pp. 191–192.
  128. ^ Miller 2005, p. 78.
  129. ^ Hodd 1975, p. 33.
  130. ^ Mitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 40.
  131. ^ Jackson 1999, p. 208.
  132. ^ Morley 1994, p. 23.
  133. ^ Mitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 35.
  134. ^ Grayer 2024, p. 28.
  135. ^ a b Jackson 1999, pp. 202–203.
  136. ^ Hodd 1975, p. 43.
  137. ^ Jackson 1999, p. 8.
  138. ^ Grayer 2024, p. 24.
  139. ^ Hodd 1975, p. 15.
  140. ^ "Accident on the Guildford and Horsham Railway". The Times. No. 25611. London. 24 September 1866. p. 10.
  141. ^ "Nazi plane guns a train". Surrey Advertiser and County Times. Vol. CXLVII, no. 10421. 19 December 1942. p. 5.
  142. ^ Larter, Grahame (19 January 2018) [17 January 2018]. "Attack on passenger train in Bramley by the Luftwaffe in December 1942". Surrey Live. Retrieved 5 January 2024.

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
KML is not from Wikidata

Media related to Cranleigh line at Wikimedia Commons