Comptroller of the Treasury v. Wynne
| Comptroller of the Treasury v. Wynne | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided May 18, 2015 | |
| Full case name | Comptroller of the Treasury v. Wynne |
| Citations | 575 U.S. 542 (more) |
| Holding | |
| A state income-tax scheme that taxes residents for in-state and out-of-state income violates the Dormant Commerce Clause when it does not provide residents with full credit for the income taxes they pay to other states. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Alito |
| Dissent | Scalia, joined by Thomas (Parts I, II) |
| Dissent | Thomas, joined by Scalia (minus ¶1) |
| Dissent | Ginsburg, joined by Scalia, Kagan |
| Laws applied | |
| Dormant Commerce Clause | |
Comptroller of the Treasury v. Wynne, 575 U.S. 542 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a state income-tax scheme that taxes residents for in-state and out-of-state income violates the Dormant Commerce Clause when it does not provide residents with full credit for the income taxes they pay to other states.[1][2]
References
[edit]External links
[edit]- Text of Comptroller of the Treasury v. Wynne, 575 U.S. 542 (2015) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |