Jump to content

Cherneskey v Armadale Publishers Ltd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cherneskey v Armadale Publishers Ltd
Supreme Court of Canada
Hearing: 12–13 December 1977
Judgment: 21 November 1978
Full case nameMorris T Cherneskey v Armadale Publishers Limited and Sterling King
Citations[1979] 1 SCR 1067
Prior historyAPPEAL from Cherneskey v Armadale Publishers Ltd, 1974 CanLII 984 (26 July 1974)
RulingAppeal allowed and trial judgment restored
Court membership
Chief Justice: Bora Laskin
Puisne Justices: Ronald Martland, Roland Ritchie, Wishart Spence, Louis-Philippe Pigeon, Brian Dickson, Jean Beetz, Willard Estey, Yves Pratte
Reasons given
MajorityMartland J, joined by Laskin CJ and Ritchie, Pigeon, Beetz and Pratte JJ
DissentDickson J, joined by Spence and Estey JJ


Cherneskey v Armadale Publishers Ltd, [1979] 1 SCR 1067 is a leading decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the use of a defence of fair comment against an action for libel.

An action for libel was brought by a Morris Cherneskey, an alderman for Saskatoon City Council, against the local Star-Phoenix newspaper for publishing a letter written by two law students criticizing Cherneskey for supporting the creation of an Alcoholic Rehabilitation Centre in a residential section of Saskatoon.

In a six to three decision the Court held that a defence of fair comment is not possible when the editors themselves did not agree with the opinion of the letter and when there was no evidence that the authors of the letter submitted the letter in good faith. The Court stated that:

The freedom of the journalist is an ordinary part of the freedom of the subject, and to whatever lengths the subject in general may go, so also may the journalist, but, apart from statute law, his privilege is no other and no higher. The responsibilities which attach to his power in the dissemination of printed matter may, and in the case of a conscientious journalist do, make him more careful; but the range of his assertions, his criticisms, or his comments is as wide as, and no wider than, that of any other subject. No privilege attaches to his position.

Chief Justice Brian Dickson wrote the dissenting opinion.[1]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ ROGERS, JUNE. "The lucid opinions of Brian Dickson | Maclean's | APRIL 30, 1984". Maclean's | The Complete Archive. Retrieved 2022-02-02.
[edit]