This category is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
I disagree. That's not a word. Even the phrase "wool growing" is unfamiliar and sounds odd to me as an English person. It is currently found in three dozen articles in Wikipedia, nearly all about Australia (there are a few for the US and one each for NZ, SA and UK). However, if anyone does see fit to propose renaming, the form should be Category:Wool-growing industry. – FayenaticLondon13:24, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
For me, that's splitting hairs. I do just care that WP has rational categories intelligently organised by people who know their subject. I have found it totally impossible to have a rational discussion with a particular editor who is utterly determined to be irrational, maybe she just seems that way but she tried real hard. Do I sound angry? Eddaido (talk) 02:34, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]