Category talk:Skepticism
Appearance
This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there any correlation between Skepticism and Critical thinking? Skepticism is the process of applying reason and critical thinking to determine validity. Shermer discusses this more thoroughly here: What is a Skeptic? In this video — the fourth in our series of videos that promote science and critical thinking through the use of humor, wit, and satire — we present a fun and informative look at the principles of Skepticism. Xenophrenic (talk) 23:28, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thats not an RS. Regardless this is about Philosophical skepticismApollo The Logician (talk) 15:29, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- Actually, Michael Shermer is indeed a reliable source on these matters. Was that humor, perhaps? And no, this is not only about "philosophical" skepticism, which is but one of many sub-parts of this subject: Skepticism. Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 15:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- You are confused skepticism in the philsophical context is nothing like scepticism of the new athiest movement. It is only a coincidence that they share the same name. Please educate yourself on a topic before commenting nosense.Apollo The Logician (talk) 16:26, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- "You are confused skepticism"? "commenting nosense"? Even Google Translator can't tell me what you are trying to say. My loss, I guess. Xenophrenic (talk) 17:24, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- So you're one of those people huh?Apollo The Logician (talk) 17:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- "You are confused skepticism"? "commenting nosense"? Even Google Translator can't tell me what you are trying to say. My loss, I guess. Xenophrenic (talk) 17:24, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- You are confused skepticism in the philsophical context is nothing like scepticism of the new athiest movement. It is only a coincidence that they share the same name. Please educate yourself on a topic before commenting nosense.Apollo The Logician (talk) 16:26, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- Actually, Michael Shermer is indeed a reliable source on these matters. Was that humor, perhaps? And no, this is not only about "philosophical" skepticism, which is but one of many sub-parts of this subject: Skepticism. Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 15:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)