This category was nominated for deletion on 22 November 2006. The result of the discussion was delete.
This category was nominated for deletion on 17 September 2008. The result of the discussion was delete.
This category was nominated for deletion of Category:Russian political prisoners on 11 September 2008. The result of the discussion was delete.
This category was nominated for deletion on 12 September 2012. The result of the discussion was delete.
This category was nominated for deletion of Category:Political prisoners and detainees of China on 19 October 2012. The result of the discussion was delete.
This category was nominated for deletion on 29 June 2021. The result of the discussion was convert to container category by designating organization.
This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article was nominated for deletion review on 4 August 2021. The result of the discussion was overturn to no consensus.
Hi folks - this is the first time I have gone through this process of a category (and subcategories) being deleted and restored - is it the case that I will have to go to each article and add the tag for the appropriate subcategory manually? --Dan Carkner (talk) 05:04, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Since the category has proven somewhat controversial, it may be a good idea to discuss best practices for inclusion. While we cannot control what is added, I think we can discuss a rule which would ask editors not to restore challenged entries without first showing references and achieving consensus on respective articke's talk pages. Thoughts? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here12:23, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'll preface this by saying I'm not a big fan of people mass adding articles to categories they have not really engaged with. I know it's permissible on Wikipedia but I don't think it always gives thoughtful or good results. Anyways here are my thoughts about this category. Of course it should be documented in the sources and not the opinion of the editor alone.
I think people arrested or detained for membership in banned political parties or movements (whether real or simply accused membership) should be uncontroversial as political prisoners whether or not we find their movement sympathetic or not.
People designated as political prisoners by Amnesty and other such groups, I think most will agree are not controversial to be categorized as such.
This will depend more on context but I think people detained with or without charge on statutes claiming to be related to public order or social peace, but for which the detainee was arrested for political or journalistic activities, ought to probably be considered political prisoners even if the pretext for their arrest was not about party membership. But whether brief detention on this basis qualifies one is another question.
People recognized as belonging to a political prisoner population in a historical context should also be strong contexts for inclusion in my opinion - those who were kept separate from common criminals and described at the time, and in subsequent scholarship, as being in the political prisoner population or sub-camp.
More ambiguous cases are those who are arrested under normal laws but possibly targeted due to their political views or membership. For these, I believe we have to be more careful and see what the sources say.
Finally, another ambiguous type of case are those targeted as members of an ethnicity or national minority perceived as disloyal by the government doing the arresting. These may or may not have been members of anti-government parties as well. For these cases I think we also have to look carefully at how they were viewed at the time and in secondary literature. Dan Carkner (talk) 14:40, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Few thoughts:
Amnesty doesn't designate people as political prisoners, but as prisoners of conscience. That topic is both wider and smaller than pp; for example, it excludes anyone who has made comments AI deems to aggressive or advocating violence, on the other; it includes conscientious objectors who are otherwise totally apolitical. So just a note that AI is actually a relatively 'useless' organization to mention here (anyway, we have a category for AI POCs and that's good and uncontroversial).
yes, detainees are political prisoners. I believe I clarified this in political prisoner. Ditto for victims of forced disappearance, who are confirmed or likely suspected of being imprisoned by the governments without said government's confirmation.
I generally concur with you regarding the other points, and note that in general, many political prisoners were not members of a "political party". It's better to think of them as activists. There's also a related concept of dissident.
Anyway, I am less concerned about the detailed inclusion criteria than about setting up a procedure to avoid edit warring over some controversial cases, which seemed to be a major concern for several people who objected to this category's existence in the past. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here04:45, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
