Category talk:Main Page discussions

increasing and unfortunate left-wing bias in Wikipedia

I have been a heavy Wikipedia user and contributor since 2002. Sadly, Wikipedia has become more and more, over this 22 year period, an anti-Trump, anti-Republican, and anti-conservative propaganda mill. It was never this way, but now it's blatant and despicable. Since many articles are so biased, I'm thinking it's becoming akin to ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN/MSNBC/Wash. Post/NYT, the propaganda wing of the Democratic Party. It's a shame that Wikipedia has evolved into a system that bears many similarities with these dishonest sources. I'm going to actively look for better alternatives to Wikipedia for information, and I will do this with much sadness since I've relied on the system for so many years. But you're heading into Pravda and Izvestia territory, the same direction in which the regime media is rapidly heading, and you need to think about this. For example, Mrs. Clinton and Ms. Harris are treated with respect and with kid gloves, and nearly every comment about Trump is negative and often false. You should be ashamed of yourselves - the blatant and voluminous lies of the regime media are a reason Trump has had two victories, so the propagandists who write for the regime media and increasingly for Wikipedia need to take notice that 75 million Americans have seen through the steady stream of lies and distortions. I hope Wales is not too busy to read feedback like mine - who knows, maybe he can do something about the blatant propaganda that has infected his creation. 71.76.144.38 (talk) 05:08, 14 November 2024 (UTC)