Jump to content

Category talk:Historians of aviation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rename this list "Aviation historians"

[edit]

Just got notification of the merging of the list "Aviation historians" with this "Historians of Aviation" list. Apparently it was decided suddenly, with almost no community input. Regret not getting to engage in the discussion before it was closed and archived.

I've been a nationally/internationally published aviation industry journalist and historian since the 1970s (including for multiple peer-reviewed aviation history journals), have functioned as my state's aviation history speaker, chairman of multiple aviation historical events, consultant to multiple aviation historical organizations, aviation history lecturer to both aviation and general museums, libraries, colleges and universities, and serve on a board of the leading U.S. aviation history association. To the best of my recollection of 50 years in the business, I've NEVER heard the term "Historians of aviation" (singular or plural) -- not even from non-aviation historians referring to our field.

The traditional, and essentially universal term is "AVIATION HISTORIAN." It's used as the self-description of every "historian of aviation," and it is how they are referred to by everyone else I've ever read or heard on the subject. For every example for which you can find that uses "Historian of aviation," I can easily and quickly cite a dozen (or dozens, maybe a hundred) examples of the term "Aviation historian," online and/or in print.

(with, in each case, more offered by Google, but not initially listed because of near-duplication of content).

If you must use a more "elegant" term, use "Aerospace historians":

So, as User:Mason suggested in the merge discussion, let's now properly, accurately, conventionally rename these merged lists as "Aviation historians".

~ Zxtxtxz (talk) 02:17, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]