This category is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
I was wondering if this might not be overhauled? Firstly, I think that it should be divided into subcategories - Category:Traditional counties of England and Category:Ceremonial counties of England (we might have also "administrative counties" as a category, but that seems silly, since most of the "counties" which are not ceremonial counties aren't usually described as counties at all!). Within the categories, I'd suggest that we double up. So that Category:Bedfordshire is a subcategory of both the traditional counties and ceremonial counties categories, and Bedfordshire is an article in both categories. This is (or was until recently) explicitly deemed the proper way to do things in Wikipedia:Categorization. johnk 22:50, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
That sounds like a good idea to me. Don't forget to make the two new categories sub-categories of this one. Thryduulf 30 June 2005 15:00 (UTC)
Towns and villages, a confusing and unnecessary distinction
I notice that each county has a sub category towns in... and villages in... . It seems to me that this is a bit daft. The lists in question are not so large that they could not be combined. I was puzzling exsctly where the division lies with a small town or large village. Most of all i think this is unhelpfull to a reader. If someone wants to find out about a particular place, do they look under town or village? Untill you read about the place you may not know enough about it to decide where to look. Any system which requires people to search unnecessarily in different places is bad. Especially if they start reading through the list, find towns in.., the place is not there, and give up because they did not notice the additional category of villages. Sandpiper19:28, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]