This category is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
do we want this to be civil Servants who were employed by the Ottoman Empire, regardless of their nationality? Or civil Servants who were nationals of the Ottoman Empire, even if they were employed differently? I think in a federal system where you clearly have civil Servants who work for distint sub national entities you want the later. So in the US, and probably Germany, Brazil, India and some other countries. In France though it might make sense to have only the former. Either title would encompass people who are civil Servants of one country who actually work in another place, at least if they are clearly nationals of the country they work for. The scope is different, but I am pretty sure fairly close in unitary governments. Here I think the question we lay have to ask if do we want civil Servants of semi-autonomous areas like Eastern Rumelia included or excluded? If we want to excluded them, I think of is better, but from will probably include them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 11:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]