Category talk:British Columbia provincial highways

	Canada portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
	This category is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.

Canada Roads: British Columbia

This category is part of the Canada Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in Canadian provinces, territories and counties. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Canada RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Canada RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Canada RoadsCanada road transport articles

Topics:
/
	British Columbia

Proposal to rename this category

As per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories)#Man-made objects, by country categories of such things are named "in country". I believe the same convention should be applied to Provinces of Canada and therefore, the sub-categories of Provincial highways in Canada should be renamed in the style Provincial highways in <province>, and this category should be renamed Provincial highways in British Columbia. RayGates 15:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BC Project Assessment

There are quite a few BC Highways that have been tagged as part of the BC Project and many others that appear in Category:British Columbia provincial highways that are not yet part of the project. Although I have looked only at a few of these, they would all seem to be appropriately tagged as {{BCproject|class=start|importance=mid}}. If some are less complete than what I have seen, they might be a stub class instead of a start class. There may also be some well developed articles that are B class. Of course it is not for me to say how they should be assessed, but those are my suggestions. It would be useful if these could all be tagged, but when doing it, please assess them as well. Useful content by the way and a big job. My thanks to those who have created the content. --KenWalker | Talk 20:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]