This category is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles

Wisconsin

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles

Pro?[edit]

It has been suggested that only Pro teams may use this category, with Northwoods League teams being removed. I'm not sure I agree - surely that category should be "Professional baseball teams in Wisconsin"? The Northwoods League teams play in an organized, established circuit and surely deserve some representation. SixFourThree (talk) 19:08, 20 May 2008 (UTC)SixFourThree[reply]

RfC: Should Summer-Collegiate Teams Be Included in This Category?[edit]

I currently have a dispute with User:JaMikePA; who says the category should only be for professional teams (not collegiate wood-bat teams), while I say that if it's a baseball team based in Wisconsin, it belongs here. Can you help us, please?? Tom Danson (talk) 20:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder why there isn't a category divider for first-class/top-flight teams and other notable ones not in the top flight, eg see Category:Cricket teams. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 05:10, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

YellowMonkey suggests an excellent possibility, but until it's done the category does not specify a type of team and should include collegiates. -- edi(talk) 10:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There would be nothing wrong with creating more categories to distinguish college from pro, but this one is clearly all-inclusive.--2008Olympian^chitchat 06:45, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]