Jump to content

Argyrochosma flavens

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Argyrochosma flavens
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Division: Polypodiophyta
Class: Polypodiopsida
Order: Polypodiales
Family: Pteridaceae
Genus: Argyrochosma
Species:
A. flavens
Binomial name
Argyrochosma flavens
(Sw.) M.Kessler & A.R.Sm.
Synonyms
  • Acrostichum flavens Sw.
  • Acrostichum tereticaulon Desv.
  • Argyrochosma flava (Hook.) M.Kessler & A.R.Sm.
  • Argyrochosma nivea var. flava (Hook.) Ponce
  • Cincinalis chrysophylla (Klotzsch) Linden
  • Cincinalis flavens (Sw.) Desv.
  • Gymnogramma flavens (Sw.) Kaulf.
  • Notholaena chrysophylla Klotzsch
  • Notholaena flavens (Sw.) T.Moore
  • Notholaena nivea var. flava Hook.
  • Pellaea flavens (Sw.) C.Chr.
  • Pellaea nivea f. flavens (Sw.) Hieron.

Argyrochosma flavens is a South American fern. It has leathery, thrice-divided leaves with dark brown axes; the leaves are coated with yellow powder below. First described as a species in 1806, it was transferred to the new genus Argyrochosma (the "false cloak ferns") in 1996, recognizing their distinctness from the "cloak ferns" (Notholaena sensu stricto). Until recently, it has usually been treated as a variety of Argyrochosma nivea under the names A. nivea var. flava or Notholaena nivea var. flava. It is found along the Andes from Colombia south to Argentina, typically growing in rocky settings in high valleys. A. flavens has been used as an herbal medicine within its native range, where it is sometimes called "doradilla". Its striking colors made it appealing to horticulturists, and it has been cultivated in Europe since the 1850s.

Description

[edit]

Morphology

[edit]

The rhizome is short, thick, and more or less upright. It bears thin, delicate linear-subulate scales, 2.5 to 3 millimeters (0.098 to 0.12 in) long and of a uniform chestnut-brown color. The margins are entire (without teeth), or the walls of the marginal cells may project from the margin. The scales never become strongly crisped (wavy) when dried.[1]

The leaves are 10 to 30 centimeters (3.9 to 12 in) long and arise close together from the rhizome. The stipe (the stalk of the leaf, below the blade) is slender, rounded, dull (rather than shiny), lacks hairs and scales, and a dark chestnut-brown in color. It is typically shorter than to about as long as the leaf blade.[1]

The leaf blades are lanceolate or deltate-lanceolate to ovate in shape, and tripinnate (cut into pinnae, pinnules, and pinnulets). The rachis (leaf axis) is similar in appearance to the stipe. It bears up to 12 pairs of pinnae, nearly opposite to one another, on stalks. They are ovate to lanceolate in shape. The pinnules are long and also borne on stalks. The pinnulets are broadly oblong to nearly orbicular (circular), obtuse (blunt) at the tip and truncate (abruptly cut off) to nearly cordate (heart-shaped) at the base, with entire margins. The dark color of the segment stalks stops abruptly at a joint at the base of the leaf segment. The segment at the tip of the pinnule is almost never lobed. The leaf tissue is leathery in texture, free of hairs and scales above and densely covered in yellow farina (powder) below.[1]

In fertile leaf segments, the sporangia are close to the margin, borne along the further one-half to one-quarter of the secondary veins branching from the midrib of the segment.[1] Each sporangium contains 32 spores. These are unreduced (not the product of meiosis), and reproduction in the species occurs by apomixis.[2] The spores are covered in a network of crests, appearing generally similar those of other Argyrochosma species.[3] The tissue of the leaf margins retains the same texture as the rest of the leaf, and is not modified into a false indusium.[1]

Gametophytes

[edit]

In culture, gametophytes of A. flavens are generally cordate in shape, though many are irregular. They have not been observed to produce farina.[4] Archegonia do not form; antheridia develop and sometimes release sperm. The apogamous sporophyte forms in the apical notch of the gametophyte.[5]

Similar species

[edit]

Argyrochosma flavens was long treated, with Argyochosma tenera, as a variety of Argyrochosma nivea, all of which are quite similar in morphology. A. flavens is most readily distinguished from them by its yellow farina (versus white farina in A. nivea and no farina in A. tenera). However, other subtle morphological differences are also present. A. flavens is tripinnate when fully grown, while A. tenera and some specimens of A. nivea are bipinnate-pinnatifid. A. tenera often has a lobe on the leaf segment at the tip of the pinnule, while A. flavens almost never does, and the leaf stalk of A. flavens is a dark chestnut-brown, while A. nivea and some specimens of A. tenera are a lighter, brighter chestnut-brown.[1]

Phytochemistry

[edit]

The distinctive yellow farina of A. flavens is principally composed of 2',6'-dihydroxy-4'-methoxychalcone, while the isonotholaenic acid found in A. nivea is absent. It also contains small amounts of naringenin 7-methyl ether, naringenin 7,4'-dimethyl ether, and 2,6'-dihydroxy-4'-methoxydihydrochalcone.[6]

Taxonomy

[edit]

The species was originally described by Olof Swartz in 1806, based on South American material from Luis Née.[7] He distinguished Acrostichum by the presence of sporangia widely spread over the back of the leaf, rather than in discrete sori.[8] The epithet flavens, meaning "golden", presumably also refers to the presence of the yellow farina, which he described as "pulvere flavo" (yellow powder).[9] In 1811, Nicaise Auguste Desvaux described the species Acrostichum tereticaulon, which he distinguished from Swartz's material by the lack of farina on the vein and margin.[10] This material was collected by Joseph Dombey, probably in Peru.[11] The species epithet, meaning "round-stemmed", presumably refers to the round stipe (leaf stalk), "stipite tereti" in his description.[10] Desvaux also revived the genus Cincinalis with his own circumscription, distinguishing it by the presence of sporangia spreading more from the margins than in Pteris but not so widely as in Acrostichum, and transferred Swartz's species there as Cincinalis flavens.[12] Georg Friedrich Kaulfuss transferred A. flavens to Gymnogramma as Gymnogramma flavens in 1824. He considered this genus to encompass species without an indusium, where the sori followed forking veins towards the margin of the leaf.[13] Desvaux continued to treat the species in Acrostichum, but reduced A. tereticaulon to a synonym of A. flavens in 1827.[14]

The horticultural trade led to yet another description of South American material bearing yellow farina. Plants collected in Peru by Józef Warszewicz were brought into cultivation in Berlin, and described in 1855 by Johann Friedrich Klotzsch as Notholaena chrysophylla. He did not explain the epithet, but "chrysophylla", meaning "golden-leaved", presumably refers to the presence of the yellow farina. Klotzsch noted a close affinity to Cincinalis flavens, but considered his material to be somewhat different in the shape of the final leaf divisions.[15] In 1857, Thomas Moore transferred A. flavens to Notholaena as N. flavens. He included in this genus ferns with sori forming a narrow line near the edge of the leaf, unprotected by an indusium, and included Cincinalis within his circumscription.[16] Meanwhile, the horticulturist Jean Jules Linden transferred Klotzsch's species to Cincinalis as C. chrysophylla in his "Catalogue des Plantes Exotiques" for 1862.[17]

William Jackson Hooker recognized G. flavens in his Species filicum in 1864,[18] but also described very similar material as Notholaena nivea var. flava, keeping it from Gymnogramma on the basis of soral morphology.[19] Flava, meaning "yellow", again presumably refers to the "bright yellow" farina on the underside of the leaves. Hooker cited several syntypes, but material collected by Berthold Seemann in Loja, Ecuador is the only specimen at Kew that matches his description.[20]

Generic separation in the cheilanthoid ferns is difficult due to widespread homoplasy, and the soral characters discussed above were the subject of disagreement. Georg Hieronymus transferred N. flavens to Pellaea in 1896, and reduced it to a form of Pellaea nivea, citing intermediate specimens between N. flavens and similar plants bearing white farina (N. nivea sensu stricto) or lacking it entirely (Notholaena tenera).[21] Carl Christensen returned it to the rank of species as P. flavens in his Index Filicum of 1906.[22]

William Ralph Maxon and Charles Alfred Weatherby discussed the merits of placing N. nivea and similar ferns, including N. flavens, in Notholaena versus Pellaea in a partial revision of the former genus in 1939. They ultimately settled on Notholaena, while acknowledging continued uncertainty in relationships among the genus.[23] They chose to follow Hooker's treatment of the yellow-farinose fern as a variety: after examining Hieronymus' material, they felt that while some of the specimens he considered "intermediate" could be assigned to one of the three taxa he ranked as forms, enough intermediates remained to make treatment as a full species inappropriate.[24] Weatherby had already confirmed Acrostichum tereticaulon as a synonym by examination of the type,[11] and they also placed N. chrysophylla in synonymy with N. nivea var. flava.[25]

Rolla M. Tryon Jr., when finishing Weatherby's revision of American Notholaena, still considered it impossible to reasonably subdivide Notholaena into sections based on the data available at the time.[26] However, Edwin Copeland, in the 1940s, had concurred with Weatherby in thinking that the ferns related to N. nivea might represent a distinct genus.[27] This was finally addressed in 1987 by Michael D. Windham, who was carrying out phylogenetic studies of these genera. He elevated Notholaena sect. Argyrochosma to become the genus Argyrochosma, and transferred N. nivea there as Argyrochosma nivea.[28] He did not make a combination in the new genus for N. nivea var. flava; this was done by M. Mónica Ponce in 1996, as Argyrochosma nivea var. flava.[29]

In a 2017 treatment of Bolivian ferns, Michael Kessler and Alan R. Smith returned both A. nivea var. flava and A. nivea var. tenera, elevating both to species level on the grounds of consistent differences in morphology and range and continued distinctness when growing sympatrically. They recombined the yellow-farinose variety as Argyrochosma flava.[30] However, the senior epithet at species level is flavens, bestowed by Swartz, so Kessler & Smith recombined Acrostichum flavens as Argyrochosma flavens, the correct name for the species in that genus, in 2023.[31]

A phylogenetic analysis showed that A. flava is sister to a clade containing A. tenera in the strict sense and Argyrochosma chilensis. This in turn is part of a broader clade including Argyrochosma nivea sensu stricto and Argyrochosma stuebeliana, encompassing all of the South American species of the genus.[32]

Distribution and habitat

[edit]

Argyrochosma flavens is a montane species, ranging from southwestern Colombia south along the Andes Mountains to northern and western Argentina, with a disjunct population in the highlands of southeastern Brazil.[33]

It is typically found in the dry valleys between mountains, growing in the crevices of rocks or among rocks on slopes. It occurs at altitudes from 800 to 4,200 meters (3,000 to 10,000 ft).[30]

Cultivation

[edit]

Argyrochosma flavens has been cultivated in Europe since the 1850s.[15] The contrast between the dark stalks and axes, the dark green of the leaf, and the bright yellow of the farina make it unusual and attractive.[34][35] In temperate climates, it should be cultivated under artificially heated conditions.[36][34] Individuals are delicate, and should be potted in a mixture of peat and sandy grit, taking care not to compress the roots. The soil mix should be well-drained as they do not tolerate standing water.[34][37] Watering should be done without wetting the fronds.[37] The horticulturist George Schneider suggested growing it in a basket close to a light source.[35]

Uses

[edit]

Argyrochosma flavens has traditionally been used as an herbal medicine in South America. Alexander von Humboldt and Aimé Bonpland reported in 1815 that A. flavens was used as a laxative.[38] According to Carlos Cuervo Márquez, it was used around Ibagué, Colombia and believed to be a sudorific, febrifuge, and anti-venereal.[39] Georg Hieronymus, reporting on the medicinal plants of Argentina, noted the use by campesinos of a decoction of the plant for a variety of purposes: to induce sweating, to treat chest ailments, as a laxative, and for postpartum women and those with irregular menstruation.[40] In both Columbia and Argentina, it was referred to as "doradilla", a name applied to a number of medicinal ferns.[39][40]

Notes and references

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f Tryon & Weatherby 1956, p. 93.
  2. ^ Sigel et al. 2011, p. 560.
  3. ^ Morbelli et al. 2001, pp. 282–283.
  4. ^ Gabriel y Galán & Prada 2012, p. 93.
  5. ^ Woronin 1907, pp. 116–117.
  6. ^ Wollenweber et al. 1993, p. 612.
  7. ^ Swartz 1806, p. 204.
  8. ^ Swartz 1806, p. vii.
  9. ^ Swartz 1806, p. 205.
  10. ^ a b Desvaux 1811, p. 310.
  11. ^ a b Weatherby 1939, p. 14.
  12. ^ Desvaux 1811, p. 329.
  13. ^ Kaulfuss 1824, pp. 69, 77.
  14. ^ Desvaux 1827, p. 212.
  15. ^ a b Klotzsch 1855, pp. 265–266.
  16. ^ Moore 1863, pp. lxix–lxx.
  17. ^ Linden 1862, p. 32.
  18. ^ Hooker 1864, p. 146.
  19. ^ Hooker 1864, p. 112.
  20. ^ Tryon & Stolze 1989, p. 40.
  21. ^ Hieronymus 1897, p. 390.
  22. ^ Christensen 1906, p. 480.
  23. ^ Maxon & Weatherby 1939, pp. 3–4.
  24. ^ Maxon & Weatherby 1939, pp. 13–14.
  25. ^ Maxon & Weatherby 1939, p. 12.
  26. ^ Tryon & Weatherby 1956, p. 6.
  27. ^ Windham 1987, p. 37.
  28. ^ Windham 1987, p. 38.
  29. ^ Ponce 1996, p. 177.
  30. ^ a b Kessler, Smith & Prado 2017, p. 206.
  31. ^ Kessler et al. 2023, p. 201.
  32. ^ Sigel et al. 2011, p. 562.
  33. ^ Tryon & Weatherby 1956, p. 94.
  34. ^ a b c Gower 1887, p. 196.
  35. ^ a b Schneider 1892, p. 609.
  36. ^ Lowe 1871, p. 17.
  37. ^ a b Bellair & St Leger 1900, p. 1156.
  38. ^ Bonpland & Humboldt 1815, p. 3.
  39. ^ a b Cuervo Márquez 1913, p. 474.
  40. ^ a b Hieronymus 1882, p. 526.

Works cited

[edit]
[edit]