Jump to content

Acid-growth hypothesis

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The acid-growth hypothesis is a theory that explains the expansion dynamics of cells and organs in plants. It was originally proposed by Achim Hager and Robert Cleland in 1971.[1][2] They hypothesized that the naturally occurring plant hormone, auxin (indole-3-acetic acid, IAA), induces H+ proton extrusion into the apoplast. Such derived apoplastic acidification then activates a range of enzymatic reactions which modifies the extensibility of plant cell walls. Since its formulation in 1971, the hypothesis has stimulated much research and debate. Most debates have concerned the signalling role of auxin and the molecular nature of cell wall modification. The current version holds that auxin activates small auxin-up RNA (SAUR) proteins, which in turn regulate protein phosphatases that modulate proton-pump activity. Acid growth is responsible for short-term (seconds to minutes) variation in growth rate, but many other mechanisms influence longer-term growth.[3]

History and development of the theory

[edit]

Early development

[edit]

Emergence of theory

[edit]

Auxin was known to be a growth stimulant, but it was not until the year 1971 that Hager and Cleland proposed the "acid-growth hypothesis," which primarily suggested the correlation between auxin and apoplast acidification.[1][2] The hypothesis states that susceptible coleoptile cells expel H+ protons through membrane-bound proton pumps into the apoplast (space between plant cell wall and cytoplasm) at an accelerated pace, causing a decrease in the apoplastic pH value. The following precise natural mechanism of the wall-loosening process; however, remained unknown at the time. With reference to auxin-induced elongation regarded as "acid-growth," Hager based his experiment on plasmolyzed hypocotyls from sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Subsequently, the wall-acidification model initiated continual controversy among scientists, and act as the blueprint for further re-examination. By 1900s, four core pieces of qualitative evidences solidified the core concept of the theory, as summarized below:[4][5][6][7][8]

  1. In auxin-treated coleoptile and stem (hypocotyl) sections, auxin induces proton extrusion into the apoplast, which could decrease the pH value by as much as one full unit.
  2. Infiltration of neutral buffer (pH~7) into the apoplast could inhibit auxin-induced elongation and growth.
  3. Acidic buffers of pH 5.0 could accelerate cell elongation at the same or even greater rate in comparison to that induced by auxin.
  4. Fusiococcin (Fc) could also induce rapid cell elongation and growth, despite its primary role in promoting extensive acidification of the apoplast.

Constraints and interpretation

[edit]

Within the 20-year timespan, many scientists have actively contributed to examining and reevaluating Hager's acid-growth hypothesis. Despite the accumulation of observations that evidently identify the final target of the auxin-induced action to be H+-ATPase, which excretes H+ protons to the apoplast and take in K+ ions through its rectifying K+ channel in the following years, the controversy has been carried over till today as an ongoing debate.[9]

Ongoing development

[edit]

Discovery of hydrolytic enzyme

[edit]

With H+ protons being excreted to the apoplast as one of the wall-loosening factors (WLF), scientists believed that the mechanism involves activation of hydrolytic enzymes through possible hydrolysis of bonds. Back in the year 1971, Hager anticipated the possible existence of enzymes from his experiment which involves heat-killing and denaturation of enzyme inhibitors.[1] However, it wasn't until 1992 when Simon McQueen-Mason and his collaborators discovered the most pH-responsive substance in the apoplast- expansin.[10] Expansin is a pH-dependent hormone that could cause irreversible wall extension and wall stress relaxation without displaying any enzymatic activity. It is activated after detecting the acidification in cell wall solution, consequently breaking down hydrogen bonds or covalent bonds in the cell wall to allow xyloglucan slipping- a mechanism that allows microfibrils to slip into the cell wall matrix without extension. Meanwhile, it could also loosen the cellulose microfibrils within the cell wall to enable the cell to take in more water and expand via turgor and osmosis.[10][11][12]

Transcriptional control

[edit]

Transcriptional modification is crucial in the growth and development of cells When a plant is treated with auxin treatment, auxin-induced transcriptional changes occurs within minutes, which indicates that both transcription and translation is necessary for auxin-induced growth. One of the major mechanisms for auxin control in plant is the transport inhibitor response through singling from F-box (regulatory protein)[13] When auxin level raise to a certain concentration, auxin will interact with F-Box protein and stimulate the auxin transcriptional repressors. This leads to degradation of auxin protein. Nevertheless, transcriptional response does not only regulate auxin itself but also mediate the gene expression for protein encoded for cell-wall modification (cell wall-remodelling agents). It was found that when treated plant with exogenous auxin, the expression of pectin methylesterases, expansins and other protein that changes cell wall's shape and size.[14]

Modern interpretation

[edit]
Main article: Acid growth

This acid-growth model has been updated to account for new mechanistic understanding. The decrease in apoplast pH value leads to cell-wall modification; the resulting increased extensibility of cell wall results in cell growth.[15] The reduction in apoplastic pH is mediated by auxin-induced mechanisms. With auxin acting as the primary signalling tool, it initiates apoplastic acidification via two mechanisms. Auxin stimulates the activity of the plasma-membrane proton pump (H+-ATPase), acidifying the wall. Auxin changes the cell wall's composition directly by increasing the transcription of wall-modifying agents.

Unsolved questions

[edit]

There are several aspects of the theory that remain contentious. These include:

  1. Measurement of pH value: Despite optimal high-sensitivity detection brought by the implementation of fluorescent pH sensors, there is a lack of reliable method in quantifying the absolute apoplast pH value in plants. For instance, scientists made use of whole-organ resolution as part of their apoplastic pH measurement.[16] However, such research methods on the cellular level wouldn't establish equivalent validity at the quantitative level due to the plausible leaking of the signal from the endomembrane system into those originating from the apoplast.[17]
  2. Limitations on particular plant organs: Most of the research has been limited to the aerial organs of plants. Instead of studying the growth-promoting effect that auxin brings to the aerial organs, David Pacheco Villalobos discovers the inhibitory effect auxin has on root elongation.[18]
  3. Narrow coverage of plant species: Data that supported the early development of the theory initially originated from coleoptiles, epicotyls, and hypocotyls of a wide range of monocot and dicot species. To note, it all began with observations from sunflower.[1] The importance to expand the research territory beyond angiosperm species to more ancient members within the plant family tree is undeniable. Latter observations on different plant species could help identify conserved hormones and genes, or underlying mechanisms that support the theory, with the confirmation of SAUR19's role in auxin-induced hypocotyl elongation in tomatoes being one of the more recent discoveries.[19][20]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d Hager A, Menzel H, Krauss A (March 1971). "[Experiments and hypothesis concerning the primary action of auxin in elongation growth]". Planta. 100 (1): 47–75. doi:10.1007/BF00386886. PMID 24488103.
  2. ^ a b Cleland R (1971-06-01). "Cell Wall Extension". Annual Review of Plant Physiology. 22 (1): 197–222. doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.22.060171.001213.
  3. ^ Du M, Spalding EP, Gray WM (2020-03-04). "Rapid Auxin-Mediated Cell Expansion". Annual Review of Plant Physiology. 71: 379–402. doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.22.060171.001213. PMID 32131604.
  4. ^ Rayle DL, Cleland R (1970). "Enhancement of wall loosening and elongation by acid solutions". Plant Physiol. 46 (2): 250–253. doi:10.1104/pp.46.2.250. PMC 396573. PMID 16657445.
  5. ^ Durand H, Rayle DL (June 1973). "Physiological evidence for auxin-induced hydrogen-ion secretion and the epidermal paradox". Planta. 114 (2): 185–93. doi:10.1007/BF00387475. PMID 24458722.
  6. ^ Hager A, Debus G, Edel HG, Stransky H, Serrano R (November 1991). "Auxin induces exocytosis and the rapid synthesis of a high-turnover pool of plasma-membrane H(+)-ATPase". Planta. 185 (4): 527–37. doi:10.1007/BF00202963. PMID 24186531.
  7. ^ Rayle DL (March 1973). "Auxin-induced hydrogen-ion secretion in Avena coleoptiles and its implications". Planta. 114 (1): 63–73. doi:10.1007/BF00390285. PMID 24458665.
  8. ^ Rayle DL, Cleland R (1977). "Control of plant cell enlargement by hydrogen ions". Current Topics in Developmental Biology. 11: 187–214. doi:10.1016/S0070-2153(08)60746-2. PMID 20280.
  9. ^ Hager A (December 2003). "Role of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase in auxin-induced elongation growth: historical and new aspects". Journal of Plant Research. 116 (6): 483–505. doi:10.1007/s10265-003-0110-x. PMID 12937999.
  10. ^ a b McQueen-Mason S, Durachko DM, Cosgrove DJ (November 1992). "Two endogenous proteins that induce cell wall extension in plants". The Plant Cell. 4 (11): 1425–33. doi:10.1105/tpc.4.11.1425. PMC 160229. PMID 11538167.
  11. ^ Cosgrove DJ (September 2000). "Loosening of plant cell walls by expansins". Nature. 407 (6802): 321–6. Bibcode:2000Natur.407..321C. doi:10.1038/35030000. PMID 11014181.
  12. ^ Yennawar NH, Li LC, Dudzinski DM, Tabuchi A, Cosgrove DJ (October 2006). "Crystal structure and activities of EXPB1 (Zea m 1), a beta-expansin and group-1 pollen allergen from maize". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 103 (40): 14664–71. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605979103. PMC 1595409. PMID 16984999.
  13. ^ Arsuffi G, Braybrook SA (5 January 2018). "Acid growth: an ongoing trip". Journal of Experimental Botany. 69 (2): 137–146. doi:10.1093/jxb/erx390. PMID 29211894.
  14. ^ Bosch M, Hepler PK (December 2005). "Pectin methylesterases and pectin dynamics in pollen tubes". The Plant Cell. 17 (12): 3219–26. doi:10.1105/tpc.105.037473. PMC 1315365. PMID 16322606.
  15. ^ Prat R, Gueissaz MB, Goldberg R (1984-12-01). "Effects of Ca2+ and Mg2+ on Elongation and H+ Secretion of Vigna radiata Hypocotyl Sections". Plant and Cell Physiology. 25 (8): 1459–1467. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076858.
  16. ^ Villiers F, Kwak JM (January 2013). "Rapid apoplastic pH measurement in Arabidopsis leaves using a fluorescent dye". Plant Signaling & Behavior. 8 (1): e22587. doi:10.4161/psb.22587. PMC 3745564. PMID 23221761.
  17. ^ Gjetting KS, Ytting CK, Schulz A, Fuglsang AT (May 2012). "Live imaging of intra- and extracellular pH in plants using pHusion, a novel genetically encoded biosensor". Journal of Experimental Botany. 63 (8): 3207–18. doi:10.1093/jxb/ers040. PMC 3350929. PMID 22407646.
  18. ^ Pacheco-Villalobos D, Díaz-Moreno SM, van der Schuren A, Tamaki T, Kang YH, Gujas B, Novak O, Jaspert N, Li Z, Wolf S, Oecking C, Ljung K, Bulone V, Hardtke CS (May 2016). "The Effects of High Steady State Auxin Levels on Root Cell Elongation in Brachypodium". The Plant Cell. 28 (5): 1009–24. doi:10.1105/tpc.15.01057. PMC 4904674. PMID 27169463.
  19. ^ Spartz AK, Lor VS, Ren H, Olszewski NE, Miller ND, Wu G, Spalding EP, Gray WM (February 2017). "Constitutive Expression of Arabidopsis SMALL AUXIN UP RNA19 (SAUR19) in Tomato Confers Auxin-Independent Hypocotyl Elongation". Plant Physiology. 173 (2): 1453–1462. doi:10.1104/pp.16.01514. PMC 5291034. PMID 27999086.
  20. ^ Table 1
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Acid-growth_hypothesis&oldid=1194859424"