From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1932 United States presidential election in Georgia
County Results
Roosevelt
60-70%
80-90%
90-100%
Hoover
50-60%
The 1932 United States presidential election in Georgia took place on November 8, 1932, as part of the 1932 United States presidential election . Voters chose 12 representatives, or electors, to the Electoral College , who voted for president and vice president .
With the exception of a handful of historically Unionist North Georgia counties – chiefly Fannin but also to a lesser extent Pickens , Gilmer and Towns – Georgia since the 1880s had been a one-party state dominated by the Democratic Party. Disfranchisement of almost all African-Americans and most poor whites had made the Republican Party virtually nonexistent outside of local governments in those few hill counties,[ 1] and the national Democratic Party served as the guardian of white supremacy against a Republican Party historically associated with memories of Reconstruction . The only competitive elections were Democratic primaries , which state laws restricted to whites on the grounds of the Democratic Party being legally a private club.[ 2]
The previous election of 1928 had seen many Protestant ministers in this state stand strongly opposed to Catholic Democratic nominee Al Smith ,[ 3] with the result that Republican candidate Herbert Hoover was able to gain considerable support in the largely white but secessionist upcountry.[ 4] However, unlike in Alabama , where Hoover nearly carried the state due to the Alabama U.S. Senator James Thomas Heflin supporting him over Smith, in Georgia no local Democrats supported Hoover.
The onset of the Great Depression completely destroyed any hope of building on the gains from anti-Catholicism and growing urban middle class presidential Republican voting[ 5] which had been seen since 1920.[ 6] In fact, Hoover fell far below typical Republican percentages from before the 1920s, and Roosevelt won more than ninety percent of ballots in Georgia as a whole and in all but twenty-two of the state’s 159 counties. His performance is the best in Georgia by any presidential candidates since Andrew Jackson won the state uncontested exactly a century previously.[ 7] Despite this landslide victory, Georgia was the only Deep South state in which Hoover carried any counties.
Results by congressional districts [ edit ]
County
Franklin Delano Roosevelt Democratic
Herbert Clark Hoover Republican
William David Upshaw Prohibition
Norman Mattoon Thomas Socialist
William Z. Foster Communist
Margin
Total votes cast [ 10]
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
Appling
601
90.38%
64
9.62%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
537
80.75%
665
Atkinson
747
94.20%
41
5.17%
3
0.38%
2
0.25%
0
0.00%
706
89.03%
793
Bacon
515
97.54%
11
2.08%
2
0.38%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
504
95.45%
528
Baker
647
99.23%
2
0.31%
3
0.46%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
644[ a]
98.77%
652
Baldwin
801
93.79%
45
5.27%
4
0.47%
4
0.47%
0
0.00%
756
88.52%
854
Banks
1,283
94.27%
58
4.26%
20
1.47%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,225
90.01%
1,361
Barrow
1,111
97.03%
23
2.01%
9
0.79%
2
0.17%
0
0.00%
1,088
95.02%
1,145
Bartow
1,546
92.19%
121
7.22%
9
0.54%
1
0.06%
0
0.00%
1,425
84.97%
1,677
Ben Hill
1,026
91.94%
85
7.62%
5
0.45%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
941
84.32%
1,116
Berrien
1,447
97.44%
19
1.28%
19
1.28%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,428
96.16%
1,485
Bibb
4,372
90.93%
405
8.42%
22
0.46%
8
0.17%
1
0.02%
3,967
82.51%
4,808
Bleckley
1,338
97.24%
37
2.69%
0
0.00%
1
0.07%
0
0.00%
1,301
94.55%
1,376
Brantley
693
96.65%
22
3.07%
2
0.28%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
671
93.58%
717
Brooks
1,426
94.69%
75
4.98%
5
0.33%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,351
89.71%
1,506
Bryan
353
94.64%
17
4.56%
3
0.80%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
336
90.08%
373
Bulloch
2,203
98.74%
17
0.76%
9
0.40%
2
0.09%
0
0.00%
2,186
97.98%
2,231
Burke
498
95.40%
18
3.45%
6
1.15%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
480
91.95%
522
Butts
1,693
98.14%
21
1.22%
11
0.64%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,672
96.93%
1,725
Calhoun
483
97.18%
10
2.01%
4
0.80%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
473
95.17%
497
Camden
417
88.91%
49
10.45%
3
0.64%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
368
78.46%
469
Candler
476
97.14%
13
2.65%
1
0.20%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
463
94.49%
490
Carroll
3,232
91.14%
284
8.01%
30
0.85%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
2,948
83.14%
3,546
Catoosa
985
88.18%
123
11.01%
5
0.45%
4
0.36%
0
0.00%
862
77.17%
1,117
Charlton
330
90.91%
32
8.82%
1
0.28%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
298
82.09%
363
Chatham
8,020
82.31%
1,669
17.13%
13
0.13%
39
0.40%
3
0.03%
6,351
65.18%
9,744
Chattahoochee
186
99.47%
1
0.53%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
185
98.93%
187
Chattooga
2,200
91.25%
188
7.80%
22
0.91%
1
0.04%
0
0.00%
2,012
83.45%
2,411
Cherokee
1,727
83.88%
314
15.25%
14
0.68%
3
0.15%
1
0.05%
1,413
68.63%
2,059
Clarke
1,992
92.05%
159
7.35%
4
0.18%
9
0.42%
0
0.00%
1,833
84.70%
2,164
Clay
433
96.65%
12
2.68%
3
0.67%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
421
93.97%
448
Clayton
1,361
97.01%
35
2.49%
5
0.36%
2
0.14%
0
0.00%
1,326
94.51%
1,403
Clinch
461
97.26%
11
2.32%
2
0.42%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
450
94.94%
474
Cobb
3,079
92.71%
218
6.56%
23
0.69%
1
0.03%
0
0.00%
2,861
86.15%
3,321
Coffee
1,652
97.06%
29
1.70%
17
1.00%
4
0.24%
0
0.00%
1,623
95.36%
1,702
Colquitt
3,534
96.77%
101
2.77%
15
0.41%
2
0.05%
0
0.00%
3,433
94.00%
3,652
Columbia
528
97.96%
11
2.04%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
517
95.92%
539
Cook
1,408
97.78%
25
1.74%
6
0.42%
1
0.07%
0
0.00%
1,383
96.04%
1,440
Coweta
2,183
97.67%
46
2.06%
6
0.27%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
2,137
95.62%
2,235
Crawford
272
96.80%
9
3.20%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
263
93.59%
281
Crisp
725
97.97%
10
1.35%
4
0.54%
1
0.14%
0
0.00%
715
96.62%
740
Dade
770
86.81%
103
11.61%
7
0.79%
7
0.79%
0
0.00%
667
75.20%
887
Dawson
567
83.88%
105
15.53%
4
0.59%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
462
68.34%
676
Decatur
1,169
93.00%
65
5.17%
7
0.56%
16
1.27%
0
0.00%
1,104
87.83%
1,257
DeKalb
5,323
88.14%
633
10.48%
37
0.61%
45
0.75%
1
0.02%
4,690
77.66%
6,039
Dodge
2,809
98.80%
33
1.16%
1
0.04%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
2,776
97.64%
2,843
Dooly
1,139
98.96%
8
0.70%
4
0.35%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,131
98.26%
1,151
Dougherty
2,012
95.04%
95
4.49%
2
0.09%
8
0.38%
0
0.00%
1,917
90.55%
2,117
Douglas
1,013
93.19%
57
5.24%
16
1.47%
1
0.09%
0
0.00%
956
87.95%
1,087
Early
1,131
98.18%
19
1.65%
2
0.17%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,112
96.53%
1,152
Echols
414
98.81%
5
1.19%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
409
97.61%
419
Effingham
518
84.92%
90
14.75%
2
0.33%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
428
70.16%
610
Elbert
2,023
95.47%
77
3.63%
16
0.76%
3
0.14%
0
0.00%
1,946
91.84%
2,119
Emanuel
2,420
98.49%
33
1.34%
2
0.08%
2
0.08%
0
0.00%
2,387
97.15%
2,457
Evans
548
95.14%
21
3.65%
7
1.22%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
527
91.49%
576
Fannin
1,375
41.14%
1,967
58.86%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
-592
-17.71%
3,342
Fayette
746
99.07%
6
0.80%
1
0.13%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
740
98.27%
753
Floyd
4,342
92.94%
300
6.42%
19
0.41%
11
0.24%
0
0.00%
4,042
86.52%
4,672
Forsyth
1,627
92.97%
117
6.69%
6
0.34%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,510
86.29%
1,750
Franklin
1,361
93.16%
78
5.34%
18
1.23%
4
0.27%
0
0.00%
1,283
87.82%
1,461
Fulton
20,137
89.69%
2,063
9.19%
144
0.64%
103
0.46%
6
0.03%
18,074
80.50%
22,453
Gilmer
1,210
66.27%
616
33.73%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
594
32.53%
1,826
Glascock
393
98.25%
7
1.75%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
386
96.50%
400
Glynn
1,262
86.91%
186
12.81%
2
0.14%
2
0.14%
0
0.00%
1,076
74.10%
1,452
Gordon
1,708
92.42%
122
6.60%
13
0.70%
5
0.27%
0
0.00%
1,586
85.82%
1,848
Grady
2,184
96.89%
60
2.66%
10
0.44%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
2,124
94.23%
2,254
Greene
918
94.44%
52
5.35%
2
0.21%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
866
89.09%
972
Gwinnett
2,616
96.60%
91
3.36%
0
0.00%
1
0.04%
0
0.00%
2,525
93.24%
2,708
Habersham
1,693
86.95%
225
11.56%
15
0.77%
14
0.72%
0
0.00%
1,468
75.40%
1,947
Hall
2,649
95.29%
120
4.32%
11
0.40%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
2,529
90.97%
2,780
Hancock
529
96.01%
18
3.27%
4
0.73%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
511
92.74%
551
Haralson
1,278
85.14%
223
14.86%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,055
70.29%
1,501
Harris
851
97.26%
21
2.40%
3
0.34%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
830
94.86%
875
Hart
1,261
98.98%
12
0.94%
1
0.08%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,249
98.04%
1,274
Heard
989
97.34%
24
2.36%
3
0.30%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
965
94.98%
1,016
Henry
1,496
97.65%
21
1.37%
15
0.98%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,475
96.28%
1,532
Houston
460
94.46%
27
5.54%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
433
88.91%
487
Irwin
1,416
98.40%
22
1.53%
1
0.07%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,394
96.87%
1,439
Jackson
1,389
93.54%
80
5.39%
12
0.81%
4
0.27%
0
0.00%
1,309
88.15%
1,485
Jasper
773
97.85%
14
1.77%
3
0.38%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
759
96.08%
790
Jeff Davis
1,179
95.70%
50
4.06%
3
0.24%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,129
91.64%
1,232
Jefferson
1,454
94.66%
65
4.23%
16
1.04%
1
0.07%
0
0.00%
1,389
90.43%
1,536
Jenkins
510
96.23%
20
3.77%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
490
92.45%
530
Johnson
1,314
98.06%
18
1.34%
8
0.60%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,296
96.72%
1,340
Jones
553
99.46%
0
0.00%
2
0.36%
1
0.18%
0
0.00%
551[ a]
99.10%
556
Lamar
714
94.69%
33
4.38%
4
0.53%
3
0.40%
0
0.00%
681
90.32%
754
Lanier
211
97.24%
3
1.38%
3
1.38%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
208
95.85%
217
Laurens
2,188
98.25%
38
1.71%
1
0.04%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
2,150
96.54%
2,227
Lee
252
97.67%
6
2.33%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
246
95.35%
258
Liberty
289
93.83%
18
5.84%
1
0.32%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
271
87.99%
308
Lincoln
660
99.40%
3
0.45%
1
0.15%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
657
98.95%
664
Long
430
95.77%
14
3.12%
5
1.11%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
416
92.65%
449
Lowndes
1,840
94.65%
97
4.99%
6
0.31%
1
0.05%
0
0.00%
1,743
89.66%
1,944
Lumpkin
924
91.94%
81
8.06%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
843
83.88%
1,005
Macon
1,438
96.06%
55
3.67%
4
0.27%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,383
92.38%
1,497
Madison
2,124
97.88%
38
1.75%
8
0.37%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
2,086
96.13%
2,170
Marion
455
94.99%
24
5.01%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
431
89.98%
479
McDuffie
568
94.04%
29
4.80%
7
1.16%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
539
89.24%
604
McIntosh
271
93.45%
19
6.55%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
252
86.90%
290
Meriwether
2,604
97.82%
53
1.99%
4
0.15%
1
0.04%
0
0.00%
2,551
95.83%
2,662
Miller
392
98.99%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
4
1.01%
0
0.00%
388[ b]
97.98%
396
Mitchell
2,097
99.06%
15
0.71%
5
0.24%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
2,082
98.35%
2,117
Monroe
1,200
96.31%
45
3.61%
1
0.08%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,155
92.70%
1,246
Montgomery
868
97.20%
17
1.90%
8
0.90%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
851
95.30%
893
Morgan
923
91.75%
74
7.36%
8
0.80%
1
0.10%
0
0.00%
849
84.39%
1,006
Murray
1,874
83.92%
350
15.67%
9
0.40%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,524
68.25%
2,233
Muscogee
3,413
93.07%
230
6.27%
9
0.25%
15
0.41%
0
0.00%
3,183
86.80%
3,667
Newton
1,672
96.82%
45
2.61%
7
0.41%
3
0.17%
0
0.00%
1,627
94.21%
1,727
Oconee
664
92.48%
39
5.43%
13
1.81%
2
0.28%
0
0.00%
625
87.05%
718
Oglethorpe
1,240
97.03%
34
2.66%
2
0.16%
0
0.00%
2
0.16%
1,206
94.37%
1,278
Paulding
1,914
85.98%
276
12.40%
31
1.39%
5
0.22%
0
0.00%
1,638
73.58%
2,226
Peach
595
90.70%
56
8.54%
3
0.46%
2
0.30%
0
0.00%
539
82.16%
656
Pickens
1,472
66.46%
743
33.54%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
729
32.91%
2,215
Pierce
1,094
96.90%
29
2.57%
6
0.53%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,065
94.33%
1,129
Pike
1,021
95.96%
33
3.10%
10
0.94%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
988
92.86%
1,064
Polk
2,170
91.14%
211
8.86%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,959
82.28%
2,381
Pulaski
973
98.58%
14
1.42%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
959
97.16%
987
Putnam
770
95.53%
33
4.09%
2
0.25%
1
0.12%
0
0.00%
737
91.44%
806
Quitman
239
98.35%
0
0.00%
4
1.65%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
235[ a]
96.71%
243
Rabun
893
91.22%
78
7.97%
6
0.61%
1
0.10%
1
0.10%
815
83.25%
979
Randolph
1,344
97.18%
31
2.24%
8
0.58%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,313
94.94%
1,383
Richmond
4,873
85.58%
738
12.96%
27
0.47%
53
0.93%
3
0.05%
4,135
72.62%
5,694
Rockdale
461
95.45%
18
3.73%
4
0.83%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
443
91.72%
483
Schley
398
97.55%
8
1.96%
2
0.49%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
390
95.59%
408
Screven
508
91.20%
46
8.26%
3
0.54%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
462
82.94%
557
Seminole
776
96.28%
20
2.48%
8
0.99%
2
0.25%
0
0.00%
756
93.80%
806
Spalding
2,185
97.07%
54
2.40%
8
0.36%
4
0.18%
0
0.00%
2,131
94.67%
2,251
Stephens
1,026
97.53%
18
1.71%
6
0.57%
2
0.19%
0
0.00%
1,008
95.82%
1,052
Stewart
588
97.03%
15
2.48%
3
0.50%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
573
94.55%
606
Sumter
1,619
95.69%
57
3.37%
16
0.95%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,562
92.32%
1,692
Talbot
912
95.00%
45
4.69%
3
0.31%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
867
90.31%
960
Taliaferro
503
99.41%
3
0.59%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
500
98.81%
506
Tattnall
2,133
98.02%
37
1.70%
6
0.28%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
2,096
96.32%
2,176
Taylor
685
93.58%
44
6.01%
1
0.14%
2
0.27%
0
0.00%
641
87.57%
732
Telfair
746
93.60%
45
5.65%
5
0.63%
1
0.13%
0
0.00%
701
87.95%
797
Terrell
1,000
97.37%
24
2.34%
3
0.29%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
976
95.03%
1,027
Thomas
2,607
96.20%
90
3.32%
9
0.33%
4
0.15%
0
0.00%
2,517
92.88%
2,710
Tift
1,394
95.09%
65
4.43%
5
0.34%
2
0.14%
0
0.00%
1,329
90.65%
1,466
Toombs
1,868
96.49%
54
2.79%
8
0.41%
6
0.31%
0
0.00%
1,814
93.70%
1,936
Towns
742
48.43%
790
51.57%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
-48
-3.13%
1,532
Treutlen
849
95.93%
36
4.07%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
813
91.86%
885
Troup
2,371
96.62%
81
3.30%
2
0.08%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
2,290
93.32%
2,454
Turner
909
93.04%
59
6.04%
6
0.61%
3
0.31%
0
0.00%
850
87.00%
977
Twiggs
646
97.29%
15
2.26%
2
0.30%
1
0.15%
0
0.00%
631
95.03%
664
Union
1,344
62.40%
810
37.60%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
534
24.79%
2,154
Upson
1,660
98.57%
20
1.19%
3
0.18%
1
0.06%
0
0.00%
1,640
97.39%
1,684
Walker
2,255
83.80%
405
15.05%
22
0.82%
7
0.26%
2
0.07%
1,850
68.75%
2,691
Walton
2,136
98.34%
36
1.66%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
2,100
96.69%
2,172
Ware
2,504
91.96%
205
7.53%
9
0.33%
4
0.15%
1
0.04%
2,299
84.43%
2,723
Warren
676
96.99%
18
2.58%
3
0.43%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
658
94.40%
697
Washington
1,923
99.33%
9
0.46%
3
0.15%
1
0.05%
0
0.00%
1,914
98.86%
1,936
Wayne
1,044
93.97%
60
5.40%
3
0.27%
3
0.27%
1
0.09%
984
88.57%
1,111
Webster
235
97.92%
5
2.08%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
230
95.83%
240
Wheeler
1,127
97.41%
29
2.51%
1
0.09%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1,098
94.90%
1,157
White
936
94.45%
53
5.35%
2
0.20%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
883
89.10%
991
Whitfield
2,384
81.87%
483
16.59%
35
1.20%
9
0.31%
1
0.03%
1,901
65.28%
2,912
Wilcox
619
95.97%
25
3.88%
0
0.00%
1
0.16%
0
0.00%
594
92.09%
645
Wilkes
1,172
95.75%
42
3.43%
9
0.74%
1
0.08%
0
0.00%
1,130
92.32%
1,224
Wilkinson
726
100.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
726
100.00%
726
Worth
2,269
98.23%
38
1.65%
3
0.13%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
2,231
96.58%
2,310
Totals
234,118
91.60%
19,863
7.77%
1,125
0.44%
461
0.18%
23
0.01%
214,255
83.83%
255,590
Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic [ edit ]
^ a b c In this county where Upshaw ran second ahead of Hoover, margin given is Roosevelt vote minus Upshaw vote and percentage margin Roosevelt percentage minus Upshaw percentage.
^ In this county where Thomas ran second ahead of Hoover, margin given is Roosevelt vote minus Thomas vote and percentage margin Roosevelt percentage minus Thomas percentage.
^ Phillips, Kevin P. ; The Emerging Republican Majority , pp. 208, 210 ISBN 9780691163246
^ Springer, Melanie Jean; How the States Shaped the Nation: American Electoral Institutions and Voter Turnout, 1920-2000 , p. 155 ISBN 022611435X
^ Orwat, Stephen F.; The 1928 Presidential Election in the South: The Question of Southern Conservative Values (1994), p. 62
^ Phillips; The Emerging Republican Majority , pp. 261-262
^ Phillips; The Emerging Republican Majority , p. 212
^ Grantham, Dewey W.; The Life and Death of the Solid South , p. 102 ISBN 0813148723
^ "Presidential General Election Results Comparison – Georgia" . Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas.
^ "1932 Presidential General Election Results – Georgia" . Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas.
^ a b c d e f g h i j k Georgia's Official Register, 1933-1935-1937 (PDF) . Atlanta, Georgia. pp. 651– 652.
^ "GA US President Race, November 08, 1932" . Our Campaigns.