Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log/2018: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎American politics 2: protected Template:Did you know nominations/Trump Street
→‎American politics 2: + will also add to BLP log
Line 62: Line 62:
* {{la|Judicial Watch}} - added [[Template:Editnotices/Page/Judicial Watch|1RR / civility discretionary sanctions]] due to entirely predictable partisan argy-bargy. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 11:02, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
* {{la|Judicial Watch}} - added [[Template:Editnotices/Page/Judicial Watch|1RR / civility discretionary sanctions]] due to entirely predictable partisan argy-bargy. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 11:02, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
*[[:Template:Did you know nominations/Trump Street]] - fully protected as discussion had already ended on hook approval... protection to prevent continuous attempts to thwart the community policy BLP and the Arbitration ruling [[WP:ARBAP2]]. Protection may be lifted when deemed necessary by an administrator to promote the hook to a prep area. (Note for authorization: Hooks, ALT1, 3, 4, and 5 do not fall under the DS system, however hooks 0, 2 and 6 all fall under the AP2 topic area.) <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">&mdash; [[User:Coffee|<big style="color:#ffa439">Coffee</big>]] // [[user talk:Coffee|<font color="#009900">have a</font> ☕️]] // [[Special:Contributions/Coffee|<font color="#4682b4">beans</font>]] // </small> 01:00, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
*[[:Template:Did you know nominations/Trump Street]] - fully protected as discussion had already ended on hook approval... protection to prevent continuous attempts to thwart the community policy BLP and the Arbitration ruling [[WP:ARBAP2]]. Protection may be lifted when deemed necessary by an administrator to promote the hook to a prep area. (Note for authorization: Hooks, ALT1, 3, 4, and 5 do not fall under the DS system, however hooks 0, 2 and 6 all fall under the AP2 topic area.) <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">&mdash; [[User:Coffee|<big style="color:#ffa439">Coffee</big>]] // [[user talk:Coffee|<font color="#009900">have a</font> ☕️]] // [[Special:Contributions/Coffee|<font color="#4682b4">beans</font>]] // </small> 01:00, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
*[[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]] - placed under editing restrictions [https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know&diff=prev&oldid=823585973 here]. <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">&mdash; [[User:Coffee|<big style="color:#ffa439">Coffee</big>]] // [[user talk:Coffee|<font color="#009900">have a</font> ☕️]] // [[Special:Contributions/Coffee|<font color="#4682b4">beans</font>]] // </small> 03:58, 2 February 2018 (UTC)


===[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change|Climate change]]===
===[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change|Climate change]]===

Revision as of 03:58, 2 February 2018

This is the central log for all sanctions issued pursuant to an Arbitration Committee contentious topics remedy in 2018 as well as any appeals or modifications made to sanctions issued in 2018.

The required information is the user or page the sanction is being applied to, enforcing administrator, date, nature of sanction, including expiry date (if applicable), basis or context (such as link to AE request), and a diff of the user notification (if applicable).


Yearly Logs (Full Log)
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014201320122011201020092008200720062005

2018

  • Topic ban changed to following restrictions: 1) Not remove any WP:G5 tags from WP:ARBIPA articles 2) Observe WP:1RR with autoconfirmed editors on WP:ARBIPA topics 3) Ensure the sources he's using fully and accurately back up the content he's proposing. He will be required to produce the necessary excerpts from sources if challenged by an experienced editor 4) Take care not to misrepresent the validity or reliability of a source. Failure to abide by any one or more of these conditions may result in an immediate topic ban or block. [10] --NeilN talk to me 01:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Amended / clarified as applying to intersectional articles only. Guy (Help!) 23:16, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article/topic level restrictions

Extended confirmed protections

Miscellaneous decisions

Use this section to record the enforcement of ArbCom decisions not made as part of a case. For example, unblock conditions where the editor wasn't banned in a case.