User talk:Tris2000

Welcome!

Hello Tris2000! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you you need any help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting "adopted" by an experienced user How to: edit a page • upload and use images • start an article

Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention

Policies and guidelines

Neutral point of view • No original research
Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources
What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons

Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule
Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy
External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry
Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

User community

Build consensus • Resolve disputes
Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette
No personal attacks • No legal threats

Community Portal • Village pump
Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists

Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review

Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Netsnipe ► 17:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graham Poll

I replied to your statement on the talk page. Cheers, Ansell 23:33, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Baustistasoler.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Baustistasoler.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Baustistasoler2.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Baustistasoler.jpg. The copy called Image:Baustistasoler.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 16:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Wags"

Hi Tris. I've retracted User:Thingg's warnings for "vandalism" which were probably issued over a cultural misunderstanding. As far I know, "wag" isn't a well known term outside the United Kingdom. For example, in Australia, calling someone a wag carries derogatory connotations that someone is immature or uneducated (wiktionary:wag). So before you continue mass-tagging biographies as "WAGs", I suggest you bring it up at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion first because the confusion you may cause might outweigh the merits to creating such a category. -- Netsnipe ► 17:34, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. Major, MAJOR my bad on that one. I'm really sorry about that. Please accept my sincere apologies. Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 17:39, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for apologising. As long as there's no trace left on my account of having "vandalised" a page, even though I haven't, then that's fine. Tris2000 (talk) 17:43, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, well, I'm not really familiar with British soccer. (I live in the United States and the only meaning of WAG that I knew of was purely derogatory) Just a word of advice though, this kind of talk page comments are probably not a good thing to write per WP:CIVIL. Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 18:35, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, but calling me a "vandal" when I'm not is not particularly civil either. Anyway, let's draw a line under it now shall we?Tris2000 (talk) 08:01, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to apologize for my last comment. That was uncalled for on my part. Cheers! Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 02:56, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance you could pop over to Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_June_6 to offer some support on this issue again? I've brought it up for discussion as per recommendations, but there does not appear to be a single Brit on that discussion area, and they are all saying delete because it's trivial. Tris2000 (talk) 10:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Try raising the issue at Wikipedia:UK Wikipedians' notice board. -- Netsnipe ► 10:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - have done so!Tris2000 (talk) 10:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thrush

I think your additions to the Thrush page are at the wrong article. All the European Thrushes are in the genus Turdus, so the food etc should be there, since it doesn't apply to the many other genera, or more likely at Song Thrush, since most other species don't migrate to the Mediterranean countries. Also note that you could add {{In lang|es}} (in Spanish) to the Spanish refs jimfbleak (talk) 15:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jimfbleak: I had wanted to put it in Turdidae, but that redirects to Thrush (bird) which is why I got a bit confused. I have now found a page on the EU website, which refers to Valencians hunting thrush using parany (birdlime), but then goes on to mention the four members of the Turdus family that Valencians can hunt. See: Case C-79/03 which mentions the word "thrush" without referring to the four types on many occasions. I will therefore bow down to your knowledge on where exactly it should go... I'll add the {{In lang|es}} (in Spanish) as well. Tris2000 (talk) 15:26, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further to my last comment, I have now added that EU page into the subsection, and await your recommendation regarding where it should be moved to. My guess is, although redwing and other birds are also permitted game in Valencia using birdlime, I think it should go under songthrush if not under thrush. Tris2000 (talk) 15:39, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved it to Song Thrush, by far the most likely. Since that's a featured article, is it possible to have better refs for the cuisine section than the on-line recipes? Failing that, they need to be formatted using citeweb. I've move the icon to the front again for consistency with the existing refs

Thanks - I don't have access to any other recipe resources other than the on-line ones, so perhaps won't bother linking to them... anyone wanting to find out can always Google it if possible. Thanks for doing this. I'll add the EU article as well, as it's a very informative one. It disappeared between your and my edits. Tris2000 (talk) 15:58, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please ignore, just realised you've moved the EU article ref across as well. :-) Tris2000 (talk) 15:58, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing this, Jimfbleak. Since this is obviously a topic you have an interest in, do you have any idea why on birdlime there is that strange Cyclopaedia reference above my references? And any way of stopping it starting with "1" and then restarting "1" again? It's actually a pretty badly put together article that will need some tidying up at a later date, methinks. Tris2000 (talk) 16:13, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the hoopoe bit and the stay number, I think the cyclopaedia bit can go when it's tidied up. jimfbleak (talk) 18:29, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Your comment @ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Tyler

Hello, I'd just like to say that I agree with everything you said and it was very well put forward, also thanks for helping to keep the articles rather than delete, it should have never been put up for deletion. Thanks, Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 14:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Sometimes I really do wonder why people nominate articles like this for deletion when there's so much obvious rubbish such as hoax pages and personal pages that do warrant deletion. This is a clear contender for inclusion and I'd be surprised now if Gene or Sam will be deleted/merged, although not sure whether the will allow the others to stay as well! I hope so. Tris2000 (talk) 15:30, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bildererg 2009 meeting deletion

Hi, thanks for your opinion of keeping the page. The problem is that the adm just removed yesterday, even writing the following: "The result was delete. By direct order of the Supreme Grand Illuminatus himself, I am disregarding the unfortunately too insightful opinion of Tris2000". Iḿ trying to discuss here and here. They are suggesting that "The decision was taken on policy/guideline grounds", which I disagree absolutely!!!! Please spread the message if you can, wen can't let them dilapidate the scarse information on bilderberg.Echofloripa (talk) 22:44, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Tris2000. You have new messages at OllieFury's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, Tris2000. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felicity Barr.
Message added 06:26, 24 September 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ƒ(Δ)² 06:26, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tris2000. You have new messages at CactusWriter's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Reviewing Icke?

Given that it's been two months since you last made an edit to Talk:David Icke/GA2, does that mean you've abandoned the review? If that is the case, you should make that clear somewhere. Gabbe (talk) 08:44, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies - in the last two months since accepting to do Icke, I have gone through a divorce. A lot of things have changed in my life. It went clear out of my mind, and I guess I don't have the time as I have a lot to do now. What do I do??--Tris2000 (talk) 17:14, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, sorry about your divorce. Secondly, if you could post a brief note at Talk:David Icke/GA2 saying that you will be unable to conclude the review, I guess that would be sufficient. Gabbe (talk) 21:12, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Footballers' Wives and Girlfriends

CfD nomination of Category:Footballers' Wives and Girlfriends

I have nominated Category:Footballers' Wives and Girlfriends (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:22, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sogflation

The article Sogflation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable neologism

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LK (talk) 01:40, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Sogflation

I have nominated Sogflation, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sogflation. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. LK (talk) 19:59, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Footballers' Wives and Girlfriends

Category:Footballers' Wives and Girlfriends, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 04:56, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Agyness Deyn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West End (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of hobbies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trainspotting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Eye of the Tiger

Hi. Regarding the cover songs, per WP:SONGCOVER, they should only be mentioned if they're notable enough for their own article or if there is a reliable secondary source about the cover rendition (not the original song). It doesn't have anything to do with the notability of the artists. --Jtalledo (talk) 12:45, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. I think it seems quite arbitrary. I could easily find plety of secondary source about the covers... the Jenn Grant one features in a movie soundtrack which is where I first heard it, and is being talked about quite a lot. But it takes time to build up a wiki page and to blanked-delete cover versions where secondary sources have not been listed seems a little extreme and there are thousands of pages out there where this has not been done. Far better, surely, to add a tag requesting a secondary source / more information, surely? I mean, every week, cover versions to songs by X Factor / American Idol / Pop Idol get added to wiki entries and this seems to be acceptable. Seems odd to me... Tris2000 (talk) 13:27, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Antonio Puchades - Reply

Hi there TRIS, AL from Portugal here,

i thought my summary in this player's article was sufficient, i see that it is not, let's try it again: the CIBERCHE database is indeed quite comprehensive for Valencia CF players, i don't doubt these figures are 100% correct, but these 355 games and seven goals are Mr. Puchades' totals for ALL competitions (La Liga, Copa del Rey, UEFA Europa League, etc, etc), the box only allows for the league matches to be displayed (hence 256/4). The 1958 as final year in box was correct, the testimonial was AFTER he had already retired, does not go in box.

Hope this settles it, attentively --AL (talk) 14:05, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clare Hollingworth

Some time ago you added a legal story to Clare Hollingworth to have it reverted because Private Eye was not felt to be a reliable source. A bit after, an anon re-added it sourced from the Telegraph (not that I would trust the Torygraph over the Eye, but there you go) and it sat there until an anon with no other significant contribs, surely not connected to Thomas, removed it without explanation in 2012. I've re-added it and scared up another source. Just saying in case you remember all that... Pinkbeast (talk) 07:12, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Stephen Sunday, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 12:08, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

His own Transfermarkt page, which is at the foot of the website, refers to him as a Bnei Sakhnin player now. I'll revert back to my version and add a couple of references. Tris2000 (talk) 14:37, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Giant Snowman 17:26, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of LGIM

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on LGIM requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. I dream of horses (talk to me) (contributions) @ 15:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if you know this, @I dream of horses:, but Tris2000 didn't actually write the article - they created it as a redirect in 2009, which at the very least made more sense. Pinkbeast (talk) 15:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pinkbeast: Oh! Let me remove the speedy deletion nomination, and revert the IP edit. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 15:45, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arganda del Rey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Partido Popular. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tris2000. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tris2000. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michele Adamson, Soulclipse 2006.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Michele Adamson, Soulclipse 2006.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:55, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tris2000. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tris2000. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:1972cobi460.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1972cobi460.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nuria Bermúdez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nuria Bermúdez, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuria Bermúdez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Footballers' wives and girlfriends has been nominated for deletion

Category:Footballers' wives and girlfriends has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pelmeen10 (talk) 09:04, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please do not change content, as you did at GeoGuessr, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add a reference to the article for the updated information. Thank you. — W.andrea (talk) 13:17, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have backed up my edit now by citing Geoguessr's own website (https://www.geoguessr.com/world-cup) where it says that the competition starts on the 11th and not the 12th. This has to be a more reliable source than the newspaper article mentioning the 12th. So I have reverted it back to the 11th, but added a link to back up this change. Tris2000 (talk) 22:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! However, adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to link rot. It's preferable to use proper citation templates like {{cite web}}, including details such as title, access date, and any other information necessary for a bibliographic citation. — W.andrea (talk) 01:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Geoguessr World Cup 2024.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Geoguessr World Cup 2024.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]