User talk:Toneron2

June 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. An article you recently created, Supplysolution, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Haemo 01:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ira W. Jayne

A copy of the deleted article, Ira W. Jayne, has been made available at User:Toneron2/Ira W. Jayne. You are free to edit it there and add in additional reliable and verifiable sources -- which is the biggest reason why the article was originally deleted. Let me know if you need help! seicer | talk | contribs 20:18, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Restored Ira W. Jayne

Hopefully it won't be deleted again.

Generation I small block page

personally i think that the Gen I page is sloppy at best. i have tried to get that page, the Gen II page, and the Gen III+ page more organised by grouping the blocks into families based on bore size and year. out of the three, the Gen I page is the most unorganised. yes i see what you mean about the information being in there twice and this is the sort of thing i am talking about. there are too many examples of random minor engine per displacement. i liked the fact that it was used in the openner for the 3.670 family because it showed (adding emphasis on) the over use of this engine as a performance engine substitute for a 350. the bulleted engine examples under the 305 section are for famous well known engines because of performance/lack of it or engine models famous for their mass quantities. saying that i don't even think the engine is worth bulleting as a famous engine example of a 305: one year model for a singal state. i do agree with moving much of the info out of the 3.670 openner to the 305 section, but the problem with that is the openner will small (mainly because the 262 was only made for one year basically and its most important thing it did was contribute the foundation for the 305's block). Gulielmi2002 (talk) 21:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Opel OHV engine

Thank you for your contribution, I answered on my talk page. OnkelFordTaunus (talk) 20:32, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LT5 Discussion

i have changed the section in question to reflect the discussion based on the finding (yours and mine). upon reading your comments, i began to feel that the section was worded incorrectly to reflect what i was trying to convey. i enjoyed discussing i guess you could call it "car theory" with you very much. i don't get a chance to discuss the topic of engines in this much detail with my friends; it was an absolute pleasure.Gulielmi2002 (talk) 19:40, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for GM 122 engine

An article that you have been involved in editing, GM 122 engine , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. VX1NG (talk) 17:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Chevrolet Big-Block engine

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page https://www.novak-adapt.com/knowledge/engines/about/chevy/chevy-big-block-v8/. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:49, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Toneron2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Toneron2. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]