User talk:Quidster4040

User page Talk page Sandbox To Do References Articles created CSD log

Please note that after one month, I move items into archives to keep the talk page less cluttered. Please refer to the archive list below to see any messages or discussions that may have occurred in the past if you do not see it on this page.

Archives

Archive 1 – 2011
Archive 2 – 2012
Archive 3 – 2013
Archive 4 – 2014
Archive 5 – 2015
Archive 6 – 2016
Archive 7 – 2017
Archive 8 – 2018
Archive 9 – 2019
Archive 10 – 2020
Archive 11 – 2021

October 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 22:54, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Quidster4040 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The account GerryLenhart42069 is not affiliated with my account. This was done as an ill-advised prank undertaken that has been outlined on GerryLenhart's talk page. The user of this account has sent an email to the admin team outlining his motives and rationale. Quidster4040 (talk) 23:54, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you have sent "an email to the admin team" making your case, I think it would be better if we deferred to them for the time being. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Drmies:, Well, this is certainly an oddity, where the VAU account drags the "roommate" down with him. I just declined GerryLenhart42069's non-appeal. I'm just simple kind of man. Perhaps you can help me, some sunny day, to understand. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:27, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- ~~User:Deepfriedokra, not just one "roommate"... Drmies (talk) 14:24, 12 October 2021 (UTC)~~[reply]

@Barkeep49: -- from arbcom, as it has been one week since last communication. Quidster4040 (talk) 06:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your patience. As a committee made up of 14 members spread across a large number of time zones and which works via email, our deliberations can be slow. Barkeep49 (talk) 15:45, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the update. Looking forward to getting this resolved. Quidster4040 (talk) 16:10, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of FC Tigers Vancouver

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on FC Tigers Vancouver requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SunDawn talk 03:24, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SHA-256

Committed identity: 30836928D2777562E6837B781C9ECD6D0815987A8AA95AAC33D5F92875898126 is a SHA-256 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

On 13 October 2021, there were 5 failed login attempts by a user trying to hack my account. My SHA-256 identity and new password is to prevent future hacking. Quidster4040 (talk) 18:32, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, probably an LTA trying to cause trouble. She tries to hack mine too. At least once a week. Make sure you have a strong password. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It had been my same password for awhile, so it was a needed upgrade. Hopefully it won't happen anytime soon. Quidster4040 (talk) 16:10, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Spice (2020 album)

Hello, Quidster4040. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Spice".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:54, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jacuzzi Boys EPs

A tag has been placed on Category:Jacuzzi Boys EPs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:11, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Juan Arbelaez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juan Arbelaez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan Arbelaez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 17:13, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jariel Gabriel

The article Jariel Gabriel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this semi-pro footballer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 18:17, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rodrigue Ele

The article Rodrigue Ele has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this former footballer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 18:19, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Warren Rino

The article Warren Rino has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this semi-pro footballer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 18:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jean-Jacques Craane

The article Jean-Jacques Craane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this semi-pro footballer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 18:27, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 758 Boyz SC for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 758 Boyz SC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/758 Boyz SC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 00:43, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zach Mason

The article Zach Mason has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant, independent coverage for this American player. Redirect to List of Senior CLASS Award men's soccer winners might be an alternative to deletion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

Trevor Perea

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jean-Jacques Craane

The article Jean-Jacques Craane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks significant coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:10, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anuar Kanan

The article Anuar Kanan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I was unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this Mexican footballer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 03:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:758 Boyz SC logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:758 Boyz SC logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of NCAA Division I men's soccer players with 40 goals and 40 assists

The article List of NCAA Division I men's soccer players with 40 goals and 40 assists has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject lacks coverage as a grouping to meet the WP:NLIST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 21:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Crobot EP.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crobot EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of All-time Greenville Triumph SC roster

The article All-time Greenville Triumph SC roster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject appears to lack the third party coverage needed to meet the WP:NLIST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 22:06, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]