User talk:Melancholia i

Welcome!

Hello, Melancholia i, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! deeptrivia (talk) 00:51, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Burg Rheinfels

Thank you for contributing this stub! I have announced it at Portal:Germany/New article announcements#New stubs. Please add any other Germany-related article you create to the announcement page. If you want to know what else is going on on Wikipedia with respect to Germany, check out the Wikipedia:Overview of Germany project pages. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 22:54, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In Tenebris

This article has been deleted -- see WP:MUSIC. NawlinWiki 05:00, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

nice pix

Image:KL View from Bangsar.JPG is a great image. __earth ^(Talk) 04:58, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leonardo

First of all, what beautiful pix you take!

Secondly, with regards to Leonardo, I have just reverted your edits to the intro, and also to the bit about there being "only two incidents of his childhhood that he recalled"

This latter may seem impossible or unlikely to some people, so twice this sentence has been "diluted" by other editors. But, no, this is what my source book says, and what is always quoted as being the case. Whether Leonardo had reasons to block all other childhood memories, we will never know.

As for the intro:- I have made a small adjustment to the use of the word "infinite". It now reads:-

Leonardo has been described as the archetype of the "Renaissance man", a man whose seemingly infinite curiosity was equalled only by his powers of invention. He is widely considered to be one of the greatest painters of all time, and the man with the most diversely prodigious talent ever to have lived.

Your edit:- Leonardo has been described as the archetype of the "Renaissance man" due to his great curiousity and inventiveness. He is considered to be one of the greatest painters of the Italian Renaissance, and having some of the most diversly prodigious talents of his time.

Four points:-

Leonardo "is widely considered to be one of the greatest painters of all time".

No need for the qualifying "of the Italian Renaissance". "of all time" is correct.

Leonardo "is widely considered ....to be the man with the most diversely prodigious talent ever to have lived".

No qualifying "of his time" is necessary.

If we were writing here about Raphael it would bbe correct to say "He is considered to be one of the greatest painters of the Italian Renaissance,"

If we were writing about Alberti it would be correct to say "having some of the most diversly prodigious talents of his time."

But when writing about the talents of Leonardo da Vinci, no qualifiers are necessary. We are talking about the man who changed the way that every succeeding artist perceived light and shade, who was the greatest anatomist for 1000 years, who invented the parallel linkage and the rotating governor 300 years before James Watt, who drew topographic maps with an accuracy not equalled until the 19th century, whose portable bridge became a standard military design and whose bobbin winder was used in every cloth factory from Hong Kong to Manchester.

When you are about to make changes to the introduction of an article that has been rated as having Top Importance, and when it is clear that the article has been extensively worked on, for a week or so, by one particular person, then it is best to negotiate changes of meaning by leaving a message on the message page or contacting the person who is doing the writing directly on their talk page so they get the message straight away.

On the other hand, corrections to spelling, typos, links that are not working and all mmy annoying doubble letters are always welcome. So are suggestions for improvements.

--Amandajm 04:34, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re dehumanising

please find reply on Leonardo talk page

--Amandajm 09:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bavarian Alps 2002.jpg

Please, can you put it in Wikipedia Commons in order to use it in other Wikipedia... Thanks a lot. Ddfree 13:49, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Angkor Thom Gate.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:BasilicaSanGiorgioMaggiore.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:56, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Bavarian Alps 2002.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:58, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Burg Rheinfels.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Christ and Saint Thomas.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:35, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]