User contributions for Samboy
Appearance
A user with 7,612 edits. Account created on 15 July 2004.
4 August 2024
- 04:0504:05, 4 August 2024 diff hist +84 Zócalo (Puebla) Added File:Puebla Zócalo at night.jpg current
- 04:0104:01, 4 August 2024 diff hist +89 User:Samboy/Images Added File:Puebla Zócalo at night.jpg current
8 April 2024
- 19:0119:01, 8 April 2024 diff hist +35 User:Samboy/Images Link to Solar eclipse of April 8, 2024
- 19:0019:00, 8 April 2024 diff hist +6 User:Samboy/Images 400px
- 18:5918:59, 8 April 2024 diff hist +115 User:Samboy/Images thumb|left|The 2024 Solar Eclipse as seen from San Diego
- 18:5318:53, 8 April 2024 diff hist +107 Solar eclipse of April 8, 2024 →United States: Add picture of eclipse
7 April 2024
- 15:1215:12, 7 April 2024 diff hist +131 Lua (programming language) Restoring {{Self reference|The article is about the Lua programming language itself. For its use in Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Lua.|hat}} I think this belongs here.
25 May 2023
- 23:0523:05, 25 May 2023 diff hist +75 Solitaire (cipher) Link to https://aarontoponce.org/wiki/crypto/card-ciphers I have no affiliation whatsoever with this site, except it’s a useful place to go to for people interested in playing card ciphers Tag: Reverted
11 May 2023
- 02:1002:10, 11 May 2023 diff hist −5 ValhallaDSP Sean added the Palace (Quantec/QRS inspired) algorithm in 2023 to VVV
4 May 2023
- 17:5917:59, 4 May 2023 diff hist −2 MaraDNS Normally, I wait before updating the version number, but 3.5.0036 has an important security fix
2 May 2023
- 01:0001:00, 2 May 2023 diff hist +379 Fine-structure constant Undid revision 1152679850 by 103.174.140.78 (talk) Revert vandalism by blocked account using sockpuppet IPs Tag: Undo
1 May 2023
- 11:4011:40, 1 May 2023 diff hist −6 MaraDNS I released 3.5.0035 a while ago
3 April 2023
- 14:4514:45, 3 April 2023 diff hist +26 Fine-structure constant There may be an equation to calculate it, but we don’t know it.
- 14:3514:35, 3 April 2023 diff hist 0 Fine-structure constant Reference after comma
- 14:3414:34, 3 April 2023 diff hist +354 Fine-structure constant Let’s link to Precision tests of QED
19 March 2023
- 18:5118:51, 19 March 2023 diff hist −83 User:Samboy Remove reduced plank constant; not used current
- 18:5018:50, 19 March 2023 diff hist −675 User:Samboy The fine structure constant
- 18:4618:46, 19 March 2023 diff hist −42 User:Samboy Remove second fraction for alpha
- 18:4318:43, 19 March 2023 diff hist +135 User:Samboy \alpha = \frac{e^2}{2 \varepsilon_0 h c} = \frac{e^2}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0 \hbar c} \approx \frac{1}{137}
7 February 2023
- 17:4517:45, 7 February 2023 diff hist +12 Fine-structure constant Update approximate value of fine structure constant to be the one from Morel et. al. 2020
15 January 2023
- 21:1021:10, 15 January 2023 diff hist +1,695 Talk:Fine-structure constant/Archive 2 →Calculated value as 1/137.04: Overdue reply: Lots of people think they can calculate the fine structure constant, but scientific consensus is that it can’t be calculated, only measured
12 January 2023
- 15:5215:52, 12 January 2023 diff hist −1 m Fine-structure constant →Spatial variation – Australian dipole: Remove extra blank line.
- 15:5115:51, 12 January 2023 diff hist −2,138 Fine-structure constant →Spatial variation – Australian dipole: Trimming down this section: The vast majority of research in to the fine structure constant, including measurement of distant quasars, finds no variation in its value. It’s WP:UNDUE to give research from one team suggesting it varies so much discussion in the Wiki.
24 December 2022
- 08:2208:22, 24 December 2022 diff hist −30 Fine-structure constant →Anthropic explanation: The fine structure constant affects proton decay
- 08:2008:20, 24 December 2022 diff hist −158 Fine-structure constant →Anthropic explanation: The source paper says it’s the coupling constant (i.e. *not* the fine structure constant) which needs to be no more than 4% above and no less than 10% below its current value for life to be possible from the elements made by stellar fusion
21 December 2022
- 21:0721:07, 21 December 2022 diff hist +52 Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard →Jenna Presley: I agree with you w.r.t how reliable of a source Dr. Phil’s website is.
- 20:4920:49, 21 December 2022 diff hist +330 Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard →Jenna Presley: Dr. Phil isn’t WP:GENREL, but is WP:MREL Tag: Reply
- 05:1805:18, 21 December 2022 diff hist +276 Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard →Jenna Presley: non-controversial; If this discussion is to continue; WP:RS/N might be a better place for it
- 05:0805:08, 21 December 2022 diff hist +496 Talk:Brittni De La Mora →Brittni’s appearance on the Dr. Phil show: Link to Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Jenna_Presley Tag: Reply
- 05:0005:00, 21 December 2022 diff hist +4 m Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard →Jenna Presley: can → can’t
- 05:0005:00, 21 December 2022 diff hist +34 Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard →Jenna Presley: Bold this section that I’m making a good faith effort to have consensus
- 04:5904:59, 21 December 2022 diff hist +1,945 Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard →Jenna Presley: I will not push the claim she was on Dr. Phil’s show in the interests of establishing consensus, but there’s no reason to not state she’s married and has kids; Dr. Phil is a good enough reference for a claim that uncontroversial (as per pervious WP:RS/N discussions) Tag: Reply
- 04:4104:41, 21 December 2022 diff hist +149 Talk:Brittni De La Mora →Brittni’s appearance on the Dr. Phil show: I have no relationship with Brittni except I follow her/her husband/her church on Instagram
- 04:3704:37, 21 December 2022 diff hist +1,878 Talk:Brittni De La Mora Sección nueva: →Brittni’s appearance on the Dr. Phil show: Since we’ve gotten in a mini-edit war over this, why this one sentence is OK. Tag: New topic
- 04:2104:21, 21 December 2022 diff hist +359 Brittni De La Mora Undid revision 1128632963 by Morbidthoughts (talk) I am not using the Dr. Phil reference to state that Brittni was on the Dr. Phil show. I am using the Dr. Phil reference to state that she is married and with kids. The consensus in multiple WP:RS/N discussions is that Dr. Phil's website is a reliable source for including content of this nature. Tag: Undo
- 04:1104:11, 21 December 2022 diff hist +359 Brittni De La Mora →Personal life: The Dr. Phil reference may be a primary source about being on the Dr. Phil show (but may be allowed as per WP:ABOUTSELF), but it’s a secondary source w.r.t. Brittni being a wife and mother. See also Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_128#stupidcelebrities.net_re_Nik_Richie Tag: Reverted
- 03:0403:04, 21 December 2022 diff hist +4 Brittni De La Mora Brittni still lives a life of purity
- 02:3302:33, 21 December 2022 diff hist +489 Brittni De La Mora Brittini has now been on the Dr. Phil show discussing her new lifestyle of purity
20 December 2022
- 22:3722:37, 20 December 2022 diff hist +100 Capablanca chess There was only one bare URL reference in the article, which I have fixed
19 December 2022
- 17:3217:32, 19 December 2022 diff hist +155 Wikipedia talk:No Nazis Link to “Nazi bar” problem (“And then [the polite Nazis] bring friends and the friends bring friends and they stop being cool and then you realize, oh shit, this is a Nazi bar now”
- 17:0717:07, 19 December 2022 diff hist +530 Wikipedia talk:No Nazis →Endorsers: Wikipedia has banned pedophiles since 2007 or so, so there’s precedent for banning people for their belief for a very long time.
18 December 2022
- 00:4300:43, 18 December 2022 diff hist +12 Human mating strategies →Short-term and long-term mating: Citation needed for these claims. This isn’t quite the debunked “women will commit adultery when fertile” claim, but it needs a reference to back it up.
- 00:4000:40, 18 December 2022 diff hist −671 Human mating strategies →Short-term and long-term mating: The overall notion that women want to commit adultery when fertile has been mostly discredited by more modern science, so it should not be included here. See Talk:Ovulatory shift hypothesis for discussion.
17 December 2022
- 23:4623:46, 17 December 2022 diff hist −5,119 Strategic pluralism Trim down lead; a lead should not be over 50% of an article
- 23:3923:39, 17 December 2022 diff hist +252 Talk:Ovulatory shift hypothesis →Merger proposal of Strategic pluralism: No, women do not want to commit adultery when ovulating Tag: Reply
- 23:3523:35, 17 December 2022 diff hist +371 m Strategic pluralism Fix dead ref
- 23:3523:35, 17 December 2022 diff hist −536 Strategic pluralism Remove empirical support section
- 23:3423:34, 17 December 2022 diff hist +185 Strategic pluralism Put statement the entire claim is dubious in the lead of the article
- 23:3323:33, 17 December 2022 diff hist −478 Strategic pluralism →Empirical support: Update for the 2020s; dubious as of 2018
- 23:3023:30, 17 December 2022 diff hist +446 Talk:Strategic pluralism →Vote to merge/remove: The theory that women wish to commit adultery when ovulating is dubious at best, and should not be mentioned in Wikipedia's voice. Tag: Reply