Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sicily/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:WikiProject Sicily. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Hoax article, presumably?
Rochina is a new article about a Sicilian ‘province’. Ian Spackman (talk) 08:09, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme
As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
- The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
- The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
- A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 20:50, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi y'all,
I've been in a seemingly interminable dispute over mentioning the Sicani wherever the history of Malta comes up. I put out a request for a third opinion, and the editor who came over sided with me, but that did nothing to resolve the dispute. Maybe someone here can help work things out? The dispute is based on the following assumptions, none of which have been backed up by reliable references:
- The Sicani were the original inhabitants of Sicily, dating from 8000 BC. (We only know they were there c. 1000 BC when we have our first records, and that the Greeks believed that they were the oldest of the three indigenous ethnoi present at the time. That leaves 7000 years of possible immigration to change the ethnic makeup of Sicily, and after all we do have evidence of Minoan contact.)
- Gozo & Malta were settled by the Sicani in 5000 BC. (This follows from the first assumption. I accept that it is established that Gozo & Malta were settled from Sicily, just not that the settlers were necessarily ethnic Sicani.)
- The Sicani have linguistic ties to Iberian. (Thucydides reports that they came from "Iberia", which included Gaul in his day, but the linguistic connection does not follow. BTW, if they came from Iberia recently enough for Thucydides to know about it, IMHO it seems far fetched to assume that the immigration occurred 7000 years earlier. I'm not advocating that we state this in the article, only that it casts doubt on the assumptions above.)
I'd be very interested to learn that I'm wrong!
Thanks, kwami (talk) 00:15, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- Never mind. Looks like it was just sockpuppetry. kwami (talk) 03:11, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Help
Hello, I have started the Lombard version of this project. It works fine enough, but not completely (I mean: by a technical point of view...how many people will take part to it, that's another matter!). Could you take a look there, please? I have added the appropriate intewiki link on the English project page. Many thanks, --62.101.126.226 (talk) 09:38, 18 August 2008 (UTC) (lmo:user:Fithuus)
Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Sicily
Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:03, 15 September 2008 (UTC)