Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Occult/Archive 4
This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:WikiProject Occult. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
WP 1.0 bot announcement
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:44, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
New article possibilities
The following list contains the names of people with entries in the "Dictionary of Gnosis and Western Esotericism" who don't appear to have Wikipedia entries yet:
- Adam Haslmayr
- Alice Ann Bailey
- Allen Kardec
- Arturo Reghini
- Benedict Franz Xavervon Baader
- Boris Mouravieff
- Bô-Yin-Râ
- Christian Heinrich Haugwitz
- Clovis Hesteau de Nuysement
- Edouard Schuré
- Éliphas Lévi
- Élus Coëns
- Elxai
- Eugène Léon Canseliet
- Fedeli d’Amore
- François Foix-Candale
- François-Charles Barlet
- Frédérick-Rodolphe Saltzmann
- Gérard Dorn
- Giovanni da Correggio
- Guillaume Sedacer
- Gurdjieff tradition
- Hermann Fictuld
- Jacques François Etienne le Boys des Guays
- Jacques Gohory
- Jacques-Étienne Marconis de Nègre
- Jean-Marie Ragon de Bettignies
- Jean-Philippe Dutoit-Membrini
- Johann Friedrich von Meyer
- Joseph-Aimé Péladan
- Justin the Gnostic
- Karlfried Dürckheim
- Leopold Ziegler
- Louis Charbonneau-Lassay
- Louise Marie Thérèse Bathilde d’ Orléans
- Marcus the Magician
- Melchior Douzetemps
- Niklaus Anton Kirchberger
- Oscar Rudolf Schlag
- Paul Sédir
- Paul-François-Gaspard Lacuria
- Raimondo di Sangro di San Severo
- Satornilus
- Sincerus Renatus
- Stanislas de Guaïta
Unreferenced living people articles bot
User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects provides a list, updated daily, of unreferenced living people articles (BLPs) related to your project. There has been a lot of discussion recently about deleting these unreferenced articles, so it is important that these articles are referenced.
The unreferenced articles related to your project can be found at >>>Wikipedia:WikiProject Occult/Archive 4/Unreferenced BLPs<<<
If you do not want this wikiproject to participate, please add your project name to this list.
Thank you.
- Update: Wikipedia:WikiProject Occult/Archive 4/Unreferenced BLPs has been created. This list, which is updated by User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects daily, will allow your wikiproject to quickly identify unreferenced living person articles.
- There maybe no or few articles on this new Unreferenced BLPs page. To increase the overall number of articles in your project with another bot, you can sign up for User:Xenobot_Mk_V#Instructions.
- If you have any questions or concerns, visit User talk:DASHBot/Wikiprojects. Okip 00:24, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Is the Paranormal pseudoscience
A discussion has been started at Wikipedia_talk:Categorization#Is_the_paranormal_pseudoscience.3F. Unomi (talk) 05:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Abrahamic Religion and Magic
This section of the Religion and Magic article needs help. There is enough information about the intersection between "Abrahamic" religions (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) to write several books (and the evidence is that several books have been written on these subjects). But the article is so poorly sourced and poorly organized that it literally gives almost zero practical information. No offense to anybody here who has participated in that section's development. I'd be happy to help, but I'd rather do this in tandem. Most of the articles that address these matters end up quoting Yates, Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition (by the way, for anybody interested in the Occult, this is a must-read). But articles abound. I will list a few in time. Right now, I have no time. :-D --Kabir Talat (talk) 16:41, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
- Just for fun, http://www.gnosis.org/ahp.htm and http://www.gnosis.org/jskabb1.htm are good links that are well-sourced (and soundly denounced by BYU's Prof. Hamblin, for whom I have a good deal of respect). I'm not suggesting that these links form the lion's share of the info in the referenced section - that would be POV in the extreme. I just remembered the links as I was typing the above. At most, Mormonism's treatment of magic/Gnosticism/Hermeticism should take up a paragraph or less. --Kabir Talat (talk) 17:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)