AWeenieBot makes sense to me. I think there's a fine line between tools and bots; any editor can use a toolserver app or a user script, but a bot is under the control only of the bot operator. An additional "Tools" tab would make sense to me, though. Tim Pierce (talk) 05:08, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry if I was unclear... I meant that they'd be on the same page, but definetely not mixed in. That would be a bad idea (although separating the tools and scripts into separate tables might also make sense). What about the move? –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:07, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And having proposed bots, marked as such, would probably be a good idea here just to help make those discussions more visible. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 16:16, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ha! I just ported the tineye gadget this morning from Commons, at a suggestion from Sfan00 IMG (talk·contribs). My version is at User:Twp/tineye.js. It looks like the chief difference between Neurolysis's version and this one is that the version from Commons will search TinEye for a scaled-down version of the image if it's larger than 300px. Maybe they found more matches that way? Tim Pierce (talk) 12:48, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This page is looking AWESOME! The cool thing is, even if the excitement over the project dies down, all the work that's being done will still be useful. Active or inactive, these pages of resources will be helpful to new (and old) editors. Neat! ▫ JohnnyMrNinja17:29, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 19:01, 25 April 2009 (UTC)