Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy

WikiProject Philosophy was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 25 July 2011.

This page was nominated for deletion on 21 January 2013. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nominator.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by .

Good article reassessment for Periyar

Periyar has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Legitimacy (political)#Requested move 1 February 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Legitimacy (political)#Requested move 1 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Remsense ‥ 论 23:49, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Jerry Fodor

Jerry Fodor has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:37, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Please discuss at Talk:Emergentism#Merger. Bearian (talk) 14:29, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Intellect and nous articles

The intellect article is rather smaller and scrappy looking but has been kept distinct from nous over the years. There is a discussion about this on the intellect talk page and more feedback would be helpful. Andrew Lancaster (talk) 21:29, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Feminism

Feminism has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 04:02, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RfCs on autism

There's an RfC on whether the current article is consistent with NPOV and a second RfC on whether to keep the current lead or replace it. The topic is related to philosophy of medicine and disease concepts. LogicalLens (talk) 06:45, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nomination for Classical theism

Hello, everyone! I have recently nominated the classical theism article. I am currently looking for a person willing to perform a review. Brent Silby (talk) 12:08, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Judgemental language

This stub has been unreferenced and unimproved for 15 years. I think it's been mis-tagged as well. Can somebody please think of the children, and add a few reliable sources? Thanks. I've cross-listed thus at WP:Psych. Bearian (talk) 20:21, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at the article and nominated it for deletion. As best I can tell, judgmental language is not standardly classified as a fallacy. (Or, if anyone has good sources to the contrary and can update the article a little bit, I'll happily withdraw the nomination.) Cheers, Patrick (talk) 18:44, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]