Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Reformed Christianity/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:WikiProject Reformed Christianity. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Baptism_with_the_Holy_Spirit
If someone wants to have a go at the Reformed section of Baptism_with_the_Holy_Spirit, that would be good -- compare it with the first section under the "speaking in tongues" heading, and you'll see that it appears like we contradict the Bible (ie. there are references to being baptised with the holy spirit after the apostolic one).
-- TimNelson (talk) 03:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Regarding project banner
I have noted how several articles relevant to Christianity have only the banner of more focused projects, several Christianity banners, or no banners at all on the talk pages. This makes it rather difficult for the Christianity WikiProject to keep track of all articles, as well as potentially reducing the number of editors who might be willing to work on the article, if only the more focused banner is in place. If I were to adjust the existing {{ChristianityWikiProject}} to include separate individual assessment information for each relevant Christianity project, and display the projects which deal with it, like perhaps the {{WikiProject Australia}} does, would the members of this project object to having that banner ulimately used in place of this project's one? It might help reduce the banner clutter, as well. John Carter (talk) 18:14, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds fine to me. --Flex (talk/contribs) 21:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- No problem with me either. Reduced banner clutter sound like a good idea. Blarneytherinosaur gabby? 01:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
I am trying to take Huldrych Zwingli to FA status. It is now in peer review and it desparately needs comments. Please add your comments here. I found from my previous experience while working on John Knox that articles on Reformation characters (other than Luther and Calvin) do not stir up much interest in the Wikipedia community, so your feedback would be very welcome. --RelHistBuff (talk) 22:17, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Coordinators for the Christianity projects
I have recently started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity#Coordinators? regarding the possibility of the various Christianity projects somewhat integrating, in the style of the Military history project, for the purposes of providing better coordination of project activities. Any parties interested in the idea, or perhaps willing to offer their services as one of the potential coordinators, is more than welcome to make any comments there. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 20:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Expand {{Infobox church/sandbox}} to cover all places of worship?
There is a proposal to convert the draft infobox template {{Infobox church/sandbox}} into a template that can be used for all places of worship. We would like your views on whether you think this is a good idea, and if you are able to help identify parameters that would be relevant to the religion that your WikiProject deals with. Do join the discussion taking place at "Template talk:Infobox church". — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 03:48, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Coordinator?
It has probably been noticed by most of the editors who frequent this page that there is often a pronounced degree of overlap between the various projects relating to Christianity. Given that overlap, and the rather large amount of content we have related to the subject of Christianity, it has been proposed that the various Christianity projects select a group of coordinators who would help ensure the cooperation of the various projects as well as help manage some project related activities, such as review, assessment, portal management, and the like. Preferably, we would like to consider the possibility of having one party from each of the major Christianity projects included, given the degree of specialization which some of the articles contain. We now are accepting nominations for the coordinators positions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Coordinators/Election 1. Any parties interested in helping performing some of the management duties of the various Christianity projects is encouraged to nominate themselves there. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 17:33, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- Much to my surprise, the period for the factual elections of the new coordinators has started a bit earlier than I expected. For what it's worth, as the "instigator" of the proposed coordinators, the purpose of having them is not to try to impose any sort of "discipline" on the various projects relating to Christianity, but just to ensure that things like assessment, peer review, portal maintainance, and other similar directly project-related functions get peformed for all the various projects relating to Christianity. If there are any individuals with this project who are already doing such activities for the project, and who want to take on the role more formally, I think nominations are being held open until the end of the elections themselves. And, for the purposes of this election, any member in good standing of any of the Christianity projects can either be nominated or express their votes at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Coordinators/Election 1. Thank you for your attention. John Carter (talk) 00:36, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
This article I've been working on since last July just made GA. (I've added the Calvinism portal tag to it). JGHowes talk - 15:28, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Question regarding project scope, possible subprojects
I have seen some comments about how this project has been judged by some to be less than successful. If that is the case, I think part of the problem might be that the project, in a sense, groups together the Congregationalist, Presbyterians, Reformed, and other churches which share Calvinism leanings, but might not see each other as being extremely closely related. In effect, a Congregationalist might not want to work on Presbyterian articles, etc. Would the members of the project consider it a good idea to "create" distinct subprojects for the major Calvinist traditions, which might potentially be more successful in getting editors involved? John Carter (talk) 18:21, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Requests
- I notice that Reformed charismatic is currently a redirect to a church that takes this theological position. I would welcome a proper article on this approach. It seems to have grown in prominence in recent years and is a notable development, representing the fusion of two groupings that previously have had little to do with each other.
- I was also suprised that there wasn't an article on Conservative Evangelicalism, so I created a very crude one yesterday. It needs lots of work as my knowledge of this subject is limited and I've probably written a load of POV rubbish. Perhaps some people here would be able to assist as conservative evangelicals are frequently (maybe even almost exclusively) calvinist.
Sidefall (talk) 09:42, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Calvin's view of Mary
Editors here might be interested in contributing to John Calvin's views on Mary. There's also a proposal to merge it (along with Karl Barth's views on Mary and possibly Martin Luther's views on Mary) into Protestant views of Mary. --Flex (talk/contribs) 19:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Quoted from talk:WikiProject Christianity:--Carlaude (talk) 13:52, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- The articles Predestination and Types of religious predestination have been listed to be merged for over a year. A drive is on to clear out Category:Articles to be merged since April 2007 and this merger could use the attention of someone with expertise in the field, or at least someone who knows more than me. If anyone could take a look, it would be greatly appreciated. --Gimme danger (talk) 22:59, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Today I came across the article on New Divinity and had a concern. I noticed that it was rated B-class under this wikiproject, but that the article had little commentary and mostly just listed the tenants of the belief. This would be fine except that they are confusing to understand, having been written over 300 years ago. I think because it is such an important idea in theology, and particularly to Jonathan Edwards' views, it should be expanded to explain exactly what he was talking about when he said these things. Thanks for letting me put in my 2 cents. Kristamaranatha (talk) 06:09, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- I imported that from Schaff-Herzog mostly unchanged. It definitely could use some love, and I reassessed it as Start class. --Flex (talk/contribs) 13:35, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme
As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
- The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
- The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
- A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 22:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
The editors of the Simple English Wikipedia could use some help with Scientology related articles. Right now, the only content contained in their simple:Category:Calvinism are the following articles: Billy Sunday; Calvinism; George Whitefield; John Bunyan; John Calvin; John F. MacArthur; John Piper (theologian); Jonathan Edwards (theologian); New Haven, Connecticut; Puritanism; Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God; Thomas Spurgeon; Woodrow Wilson. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me, User:American Eagle, or User:Eptalon. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 23:02, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
William III of England FAR
William III of England has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. – Ilse@ 11:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Calvinism
Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:16, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
I would like to propose that the Category:Reformed Church be retired as unclear and the items therein be moved to either Category:Reformed denominations (mostly) or Category:Calvinism. If you go to Category:Christian denominations you will see most such categories are of the form, e.g. Category:Methodist denominations, where Category:Methodist churches are about church buildings.--Carlaude (talk) 05:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds pretty reasonable to me. Blarneytherinosaur gabby? 10:25, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
I have cross-proposed this at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_October_2#Category:Reformed_Church.--Carlaude (talk) 00:11, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Please see this relisting for the current discussion of using Category:Calvinist denominations or Category:Reformed denominations.--Carlaude (talk) 15:32, 10 October 2008 (UTC)