Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Stub sorting
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Stub sorting and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
 | Before proposing or creating a new type of stub, please read How to propose a new stub type. |
| For discussion about creation of stub types or the hierarchy of stub categories, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals. |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
| This WikiProject was featured on the WikiProject report at the Signpost on 13 February 2012. |
| NOTE: This page is not a forum to suggest the creation of articles. If you wish to create an article on any subject, go to Wikipedia:Articles for creation and follow the instructions there. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
|
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Formatting error?
[edit]Hello all, I just proposed this new stub category but I think I've made an error somewhere that I can't see as the nomination doesn't appear on the main proposals page - help! Lajmmoore (talk) 15:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
All stubs list
[edit]Is there an list of all stubs (not stub articles, that is articles with stub tags)? That is, a WP:STUBLONG (as opposed to WP:STUBSHORT)? Tule-hog (talk) 01:20, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- I believe its supposed to be WP:STUBTAGS but that got lost in the "See the separate ___ page" format - before I go haywire embedding the full list there, were the categories intentionally un-embedded due to length or were they simply awaiting someone to do it justice? Tule-hog (talk) 02:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Also given there is other useful information at WP:SST, perhaps WP:STUBTAGS should be moved to its own page due to length? Tule-hog (talk) 02:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Yacht racing (not sailing) stub templates and category tree
[edit]You may be interested to join the discussion: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sports#Yacht racing (not sailing) stub templates and category tree. Pelmeen10 (talk) 18:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Zemgale
[edit]I think Category:Zemgale geography stubs and Template:Zemgale-geo-stub should simultaneously renamed from Zemgale to Semigallia, per article title Semigallia and Category:Semigallia. What is the right process for that? Marcocapelle (talk) 03:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- CfD, I think. Her Pegship (?) 23:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Zoological stub templates
[edit]Does anyone have an opinion about the proposals for upmerged templates currently on the proposals page? Most of them have fewer than 30 possible uses. Her Pegship (?) 23:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
How many stubs to merit an upmerged template?
[edit]I don't know whether this has been discussed anywhere; in light of a few of the current proposals, I've been wondering what the threshold should be for creation of an upmerged template. One such proposal shows that there are only 3 articles that would qualify for {{Rheiformes-stub}}, for example, and Grey Clownfish proposes that it be created and upmerged to Category:Bird stubs. To me, this begs the question as to whether every stub category needs an upmerged template for every possible sub-cat, regardless of the quantity of articles it might apply to. I'm not sure I'm expressing myself very well, but wouldn't this sort of action prompt an enormous number of barely-used templates, and wouldn't it be a lot of work to organize/track/list all of them? Her Pegship (?) 23:08, 1 December 2024 (UTC)