Wikipedia talk:Tutorial (historical): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
←Replaced content with 'KIHARI THE KIHARI IS ONE OF THE MOST BEAUTIFUL VALLY OF HARIPUR NWFP PAKISTAN' |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
KIHARI |
|||
<!--- Please do not edit the following lines! Thank you. ---> |
|||
THE KIHARI IS ONE OF THE MOST BEAUTIFUL VALLY OF HARIPUR NWFP PAKISTAN |
|||
{{WP help pages (header bar)}} |
|||
{{Talkpage of help}} |
|||
{{Help Project}} |
|||
{{archives|search=yes|auto=yes}} |
|||
<!--- Please do not edit the above lines! Thank you. ---> |
|||
<!--- Please add comments by clicking the "new section" link! Thank you. ---> |
|||
== Verification == |
|||
This is the hardest thing I ever had to do, I can't believe how many hours I have been on this site trying to figure out how to create a paragraph and then post it to this site. I feel so stupid and still can't post anything why isn't there a phone number and live person to talk too <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jrakosi|Jrakosi]] ([[User talk:Jrakosi|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jrakosi|contribs]]) 00:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
This tutorial does not clearly express the importance of [[WP:CITE|citing references]] when adding content to Wikipedia. Content in Wikipedia must be [[WP:Verifiable|verifiable]]. This tutorial suggests that an '''External links''' section can be used as a substitute for a '''References''' or '''Notes and references''' section. This tutorial does not agree with [[WP:Verifiability]], [[WP:MOS]], [[Wikipedia:Guide to layout]], and [[WP:EL|Wikipedia's guidelines on external links]]. |
|||
If instructions to new users do not agree with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, you can expect a lot of unsourced personal opinion and experience being recorded in Wikipedia. This tutorial encourages new editors to '''Be Bold''' without making it clear to everyone that verifiable sources are required for all text added to Wikipedia articles. This in an [[encyclopedia]]. |
|||
I strongly suggest you clean up this tutorial ASAP. It's been misleading new editors for over three years. --[[User:64.181.91.212|64.181.91.212]] 02:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Maybe the '''External links''' instructions should be replaced with '''Citing sources''' instructions that describe how to use <nowiki><ref></ref>, <references/>, and {{Reflist}}</nowiki>. Comments? --[[User:Foggy Morning|Foggy Morning]] 04:20, 18 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
let's do it ! ok i like doing it!!--[[User:Sekule|Sekule]] 16:23, 20 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
How? --[[User:65.78.215.78|65.78.215.78]] 02:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::I agree. Let's call the tab "Citing sources", and adjust the text to focus on proper citations in footnotes ---- [[User:CharlesGillingham|CharlesGillingham]] ([[User talk:CharlesGillingham|talk]]) 05:38, 17 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::I looked into this and the code whores '''Citing sources''' are both good titles for this tab. ---- [[User:CharlesGillingham|CharlesGillingham]] ([[User talk:CharlesGillingham|talk]]) 20:10, 5 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
I renamed the page, but made only minor modifications to the text. If you want to modify it more substantially, go ahead. [[User:Cenarium|Cenarium]] ([[User talk:Cenarium|talk]]) 21:17, 8 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Consider new tab? == |
|||
It would be helpful to incorporate an "advanced editing" tab that explains how to nominate AFDs and CFDs, and how to delete articles and categories one creates in error (ie, by misspelling, or by not noticing an existing similarly-named category.). I've been editing for years, but every time I encounter a potential AFD, I have turn over heaven and earth to find the instructions again. --<span style="font-family:Harlow Solid Italic; font-size:14px;">[[User:TheEditrix2|TheEditrix2]]</span> 17:34, 18 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:I agree this would be useful. I don't kow how to edit tab pages. Do you know how to edit tab pages? --[[User:Foggy Morning|Foggy Morning]] 14:00, 21 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:It'd be better to just improve/clarify the instructions at [[WP:AFD]]. -- [[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]] <small>([[User talk:Quiddity|talk]])</small> 20:01, 19 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::Actually, I disagree. I think that we need to keep the tutorial as simple as possible. This tutorial should be designed primarily to help people add accurate information or fix incorrect information, especially those who are only reading this to make a single edit. ---- [[User:CharlesGillingham|CharlesGillingham]] ([[User talk:CharlesGillingham|talk]]) 20:14, 5 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== hacked link on page? == |
|||
the "let's learn about editing" link on this page links to private listing for a company advertising their classified ad services. |
|||
anyone know where this came from or how to fix it? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:TashiD|TashiD]] ([[User talk:TashiD|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TashiD|contribs]]) 19:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Fixed. It was just a standard editing test that noone had yet reverted. Thanks for the heads-up. -- [[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]] <small>([[User talk:Quiddity|talk]])</small> 20:40, 7 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== TOC == |
|||
See [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost Tutorials]]. —[[User talk:Markles|Markles]] 17:08, 19 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Editnotices for sandboxes == |
|||
Using [[WP:EDN|editnotices]] for tutorial sandboxes could help new users, with a sandbox-like introduction and more content hidden that users can show if wanted, based on the related tutorial. I have given editnotices that we could use at [[User:Cenarium/Sandbox/tutorial editnotice]]. Feedback and improvements would be appreciated, thanks. [[User:Cenarium|Cenarium]] ([[User talk:Cenarium|talk]]) 23:29, 4 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Without taking a close look at the actual notices you've set up, I say go for it: I just plain like this idea. We've just recently put up an editnotice at [[WP:EAR|Editor Assistance/Requests]] and the results were immediately visible. They are very helpful for new users. Good idea, Cenarium! :-] <i>'''[[User Talk:Fleetflame|<span style="font-family:Courier New"><span style="color:black">Fl</span><span style="color:maroon">ee</span><span style="color:red">tf</span><span style="color:maroon">la</span><span style="color:black">me</span></span>]]'''</i> 15:37, 5 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::I take it this is done now? Looks good. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] <sup>[[user talk:rd232|talk]]</sup> 15:29, 11 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::I added ones for editing, formatting and Wikipedia links. They can be edited (by admins) at [[Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Tutorial (Editing)/sandbox]], etc. We can discuss them here for improvements. [[User:Cenarium|Cenarium]] ([[User talk:Cenarium|talk]]) 17:55, 11 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Looks great! [[user:leevanjackson|L∴V]] 14:28, 29 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Editnotice for this page== |
|||
Located at [[Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia talk:Tutorial]]. [[User:Cenarium|Cenarium]] ([[User talk:Cenarium|talk]]) 15:28, 15 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
'''tell about bus duct . pls tell exactly what is this with any picture if possible''' |
|||
== shortcut to tutorial == |
|||
Hi ya'll. Just want to mention, [[H:T]] goes to [[Help:Template]], while [[WP:T]] goes here. Seems like it should be different is all. [[User:JoeSmack|JoeSmack]] <sup>[[User Talk:JoeSmack|Talk]]</sup> 02:55, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Button on screen to be clicked rather than pressed == |
|||
On http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Tutorial_(Talk_pages) It says: |
|||
For your convenience, there is a button at the top of the edit box with a signature icon inserts <nowiki>"--~~~~"</nowiki> when pressed. |
|||
I think it should read "clicked" rather than "pressed". |
|||
[[User:AmigoCgn|AmigoCgn]] ([[User talk:AmigoCgn|talk]]) 15:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Clicked may be a better term - have changed, cheers! [[user:leevanjackson|Lee∴V]] [[User talk:leevanjackson|<font color="#a3bfb1">(talk</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/leevanjackson|<font color="#a3bfb1">contribs)]]</font> 22:17, 18 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::While we're on the subject, there are some issues with that particular sentence ("For your convenience, there is a button at the top of the edit box with a signature icon inserts <nowiki>"--~~~~"</nowiki> when clicked."). I feel it should read "For your convenience, there is a button at the top of the edit box with a signature icon ''which'' inserts <nowiki>"--~~~~"</nowiki> when clicked. I don't think I myself am actually able/allowed to make that correction, though, so I leave the matter in your wiser and more capable hands. ;) - [[User:ReySquared|ReySquared]] ([[User talk:ReySquared|talk]]) 22:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:::You're right - good spot. Just fixed it.--<small>[[User:JohnBlackburne|JohnBlackburne]]</small><sup>[[User_talk:JohnBlackburne|words]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">[[Special:Contributions/JohnBlackburne|deeds]]</sub> 22:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC) |
|||
==Editing Protected Pages== |
|||
Many Wikipedia pages are now protected and new users, who may be subject matter experts, will have difficulty understanding the complexity of different types of protection. This issue makes editing very difficult and discourages contributions to Wikipedia. WikiProject pages require special access to make edits. I would like to see a tab in the tutorial section called: Editing Protected Pages. Currently in Wikipedia there are links in different places leading to pages explaining protection. I have found that the format is not in a "learning style" and it is necessary to find and click on many links on different pages to gain a more complete understanding of how to edit protected articles. [[User:Figlinus|Figlinus]] ([[User talk:Figlinus|talk]]) 00:44, 26 March 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== clarity on the "Citing references" page == |
|||
It would have been a help to me if the line: |
|||
* <nowiki><ref>YOUR SOURCE</ref></nowiki> |
|||
would have been followed by the words: This will put a footnote reference number in superscript after the last word before the tagged entry.--[[User:Ngstanton|Ngstanton]] ([[User talk:Ngstanton|talk]]) 14:35, 2 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Standards not followed == |
|||
The normal academic and business standard is not folowed in the first para. It reads, "Instead of a strict WYSIWYG approach ("What You See Is What You Get"),.. ". |
|||
This should be changed to "Instead of a strict "What You See Is What You Get" (WYSIWYG) approach , ...". |
|||
The standard is that you write the full term first and then put the aronym or other common term in parenthesis. Thereafter, you are free to use the acronym etc without explanation. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Apault|Apault]] ([[User talk:Apault|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Apault|contribs]]) 11:06, 18 July 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Written by Apault (apologies for original omission) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Apault|Apault]] ([[User talk:Apault|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Apault|contribs]]) 11:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
==WP:Bold== |
|||
Have boldly went and added a link to [[Help:Wikipedia: The Missing Manual]] for anyone wanting an extensive manual. See what you think of it, [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 16:04, 3 August 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Good idea. I think many new users would appreciate having a more in depth tutorial. -- [[User:OlEnglish|<font size="5">œ</font>]][[User talk:OlEnglish|<sup>™</sup>]] 17:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== This site is a little bit redundant to [[WP:Article wizard]] == |
|||
, isn´t it? --[[User:Hæggis|Hæggis]] ([[User talk:Hæggis|talk]]) 18:01, 16 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Mmm, nope, I don't think so, but even so, redundancy is good when it comes to training newbies. -- [[User:OlEnglish|<font size="5">œ</font>]][[User talk:OlEnglish|<sup>™</sup>]] 20:11, 16 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:20, 24 September 2010
KIHARI THE KIHARI IS ONE OF THE MOST BEAUTIFUL VALLY OF HARIPUR NWFP PAKISTAN