Wikipedia talk:Good articles: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Wikipedia talk:Good articles/Archive 14) (bot |
→Semi-protected edit request on 14 January 2016: new section |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
:I'm not exactly sure what you mean; this is just a list of articles so there's no real content to change. Is there an article in particular you're asking about? [[User:Grapple X|'''G<small>RAPPLE</small>''']] [[User talk:Grapple X|'''<small><sup>X</sup></small>''']] 15:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC) |
:I'm not exactly sure what you mean; this is just a list of articles so there's no real content to change. Is there an article in particular you're asking about? [[User:Grapple X|'''G<small>RAPPLE</small>''']] [[User talk:Grapple X|'''<small><sup>X</sup></small>''']] 15:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC) |
||
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=]] '''Not done:''' this is the [[WP:TP|talk page]] for discussing improvements to the page [[:Wikipedia:Good articles]]. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned.<!-- Template:ESp --> --[[User:Majora|Majora]] ([[User talk:Majora|talk]]) 15:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC) |
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=]] '''Not done:''' this is the [[WP:TP|talk page]] for discussing improvements to the page [[:Wikipedia:Good articles]]. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned.<!-- Template:ESp --> --[[User:Majora|Majora]] ([[User talk:Majora|talk]]) 15:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Semi-protected edit request on 14 January 2016 == |
|||
{{edit semi-protected|Wikipedia:Good articles|answered=no}} |
|||
<!-- Be sure to state UNAMBIGUOUSLY your suggested changes; editors who can edit the protected page need to know what to add or remove. Blank edit requests WILL be declined. --> |
|||
<!-- Begin request --> |
|||
<!-- End request --> |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/80.150.104.59|80.150.104.59]] ([[User talk:80.150.104.59|talk]]) 10:23, 14 January 2016 (UTC) |
|||
unicorns exist!!!! |
|||
Revision as of 10:23, 14 January 2016
 | Please direct discussions about the Good Article Nomination process to Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations or requests for GA help to the Wikipedia:Good article help desk. Any comments regarding the improvement of the GA program as a whole may be directed to WikiProject Good Articles. Comments on individual Good Articles should be posted on their article talk pages. Thank you. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Good articles page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Time to further subdivide architecture?
Wikipedia:Good articles/Art and architecture is approaching 400 articles now under "Architecture". Perhaps we could split a few ones like houses and hotels?♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:11, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Cat
This article was promoted yesterday and in all honesty I am concerned whether or not it should have been listed in the first place. For starters I am not sure if the article has gone through a thorough copyedit, and there are still "citation needed" and "clarification needed" tags. There are also several citations within the article tagged with "self-published source" and "dead link". Many seem to be unreliable too. This statement has been added to many references:
"This is a tertiary source that clearly includes information from other sources but does not name them."
I have noticed that some paragraphs are not even cited, and the user who nominated the article wasn't even a major contributor (infact I don't think they even made a single one until someone decided to review this). I think an urgent second review is needed. Burklemore1 (talk) 07:04, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 5 January 2016
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Ladycools (talk) 23:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. DatbubblegumdoeIt's2016? 23:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Add an Anatomy section?
I notice the Biology section has a lot of articles like Brain, Cervix, Pudendal nerve, etc. Would it make sense to add an anatomy section just for these? (It could be human and nonhuman anatomy). I would be happy to do the split. delldot ∇. 21:06, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Prhartcom:, @Animalparty:, @FunkMonk:, you all weighed in on the Animal taxa split earlier, any thoughts on this idea? delldot ∇. 16:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 11 January 2016
| This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change married to Tyler Diebel. 66.87.144.111 (talk) 15:18, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not exactly sure what you mean; this is just a list of articles so there's no real content to change. Is there an article in particular you're asking about? GRAPPLE X 15:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the page Wikipedia:Good articles. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. --Majora (talk) 15:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 14 January 2016
 | It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected project page at Wikipedia:Good articles. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
80.150.104.59 (talk) 10:23, 14 January 2016 (UTC) unicorns exist!!!!