Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2023/November

This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2023. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page.

Proposals, November 2023

Bulbophyllum (Asia-Pacific clade)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category:Bulbophyllum (Asia-Pacific clade) stubs has over 1,200 articles and no subcategories. Therefore, I propose the creation of these categories + their respective stub templates:

Support. --Fadesga (talk) 20:54, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Holocephali stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The Category:Holocephali has over 70 stub-like articles, as can be seen here. I propose the creation of the Category:Holocephali stubs. Best, --Fadesga (talk) 14:42, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Edited: I have created the templates {{Holocephalan-stub}} and {{Paleo-holocephalan-stub}}; using the tool, there are 36 + 58 = 94 holocephalan stubs so far. --Fadesga (talk) 13:12, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Batoidea stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
In the Category:Cartilaginous fish stubs there is already a Category:Rajiformes stubs. But, looking further, Category:Rajiformes is actually a subcategory of Category:Rays, corresponding to the clade Batoidea. If we look at this analysis, there are at least 100 Rays articles that do not belong to Rajiformes proper. This invites to the creation of a Category:Batoidea stubs (which will then include the existing Category:Rajiformes stubs as a subcategory). Best, --Fadesga (talk) 16:28, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.