Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Yugoslav order of battle prior to the invasion of Yugoslavia
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article promoted Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:04, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator(s): Peacemaker67 (send... over)
I am nominating this article for A-Class review because it underwent significant work in user space before being assessed as meeting BL criteria, and has now been improved further. It details the Yugoslav forces that were ranged against the April 1941 Axis invasion of Yugoslavia. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 01:32, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support on prose per standard disclaimer. - Dank (push to talk) 19:41, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Comment: this looks pretty good to me. The only question I have is about the heading levels. You have Royal Yugoslav Air Force and Royal Yugoslav Navy as subheadings of Royal Yugoslav Army. Is this correct? Perhaps, they should be equal in level (level two) to the Royal Yugoslav Army? Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 06:14, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Absolutely. No idea what happened there. Fixed now. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 06:36, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- I have the same comments here as the Axis article
- infobox
- per my response there, none of the current FL ORBATs have an infobox, I don't think it is necessary or helpful.
- citations
- will get to work checking them. Done.
- Why We Fight link
- Done.
- Image issues.
- Again, they are aligned with the relevant sections. A gallery would break the association between the images and the relevant section.
- Thanks, Kirk (talk) 14:19, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Have taken your suggestion and moved the equipment, aircraft and ships into galleries in the respective sections.
- Thanks for your comments. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 07:57, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Addressed these points, thanks Kirk. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 10:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support
- No dab links [1] (no action req'd).
- External links all check out [2] (no action req'd).
- A couple of images lack Alt Text so you might consider adding it for consistency [3] (not an ACR requirement - suggestion only).
- The Citation Check Tool reveals no issues with reference consolidation (no action req'd).
- Images all appear to be PD/free/licensed and seem appropriate to the article (no action req'd).
- The Earwig Tool reveal no issues with copyright violation or close paraphrasing [4] (no action req'd).
- No duplicate links per WP:REPEATLINK (no action req'd).
- You mention the issue of the lack of modern tanks in a couple of places, and this seems a little repetitive to me. Perhaps bin one? (suggestion only)
- I've left it in there so that the lead reflects the body.
- Is the place of publishing available for this ref: "U.S. Army (1986) [1953]. The German Campaigns in the Balkans (Spring 1941). United States Army Center of Military History. OCLC 16940402. CMH Pub 104-4." I'm assuming its Washington, D.C. from other CMH publications I own in my library.
- Added.
- Overall, this is another sophisticated ORBAT in my opinion. Only a couple of minor points to address. Well done. Anotherclown (talk) 09:35, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, Ac. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 03:25, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.