Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Peer review/Latter Days

Latter Days

Wanting to take this to FA, but not sure what to do with it now. your thoughts would be good. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 09:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Production could be expanded... Cbrown1023 17:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 21:49, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't think of anything, then you don't need to expand it. ;) Cbrown1023 15:19, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Latter_Days_Cover.jpg needs a fair use rationale and another picture would be good if you can add one. Cbrown1023 17:46, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added fair use rationale, and one screenshot. Looks like I can't add another one under the fair use licences. Anything else? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 21:49, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but where are the rationales? I don't see either of them. Cbrown1023 22:22, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They're in the <!- brackets, above each image code. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 22:38, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Those say that there is a fair use rationle on the image page but there isn't. See Image:Publicenemyposter.gif for an example of a poster's rationale and Image:Grapefruit-james_cagney-mae_clark21a.jpg for an example of a screen shot's rationale. Cbrown1023 22:57, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, right, OK. I've added fair use rationales to the actual images now. Is this OK? Do you have any other comments for how to improve the article for FA? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 10:08, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

good job... Cbrown1023 15:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just did a big copyedit of that page and renamed/moved some sectoins. You might want to check it for more/evaluate my changes, I'll come back with more suggestions in a minute. Cbrown1023 15:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They seem fine, under a cursory look. Thanks for that, and everything else you've suggested. I think once you're finished I will nominate for FA. :) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 17:06, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Make sure the Themes section is completely cited or else it will be thought of as OR and will not pass a FA or a GA nomination. Cbrown1023 15:14, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was concerned about that when I was first told to create a section, but I think it's cited OK now, and the one sentence that isn't is blatantly obvious and so doesn't need citation. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 17:06, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Everything else seems good, I'm pretty sure that you can nominate for FA. After all, a featured article nomination is as much a peer review, as a candidacy. If you don't succeed, they will give you ways on how to improve and you can just renominate it after you do that. Cbrown1023 19:13, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll nominate now then. Thanks for your help man - I've learnt new stuff from this peer review (like fair use rationales...). Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 19:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]