Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 September 22

< September 21	September 23 >

September 22

Template:Adam Sandler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:34, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Adam Sandler (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per precedent, we do not keep templates for film actor filmographies. Full filmographies already exist in the subject article, rendering this redundant. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:45, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Concensus is firmly against this sort of thing, because otherwise you would end up with film articles that have ten or twenty actor navboxes. PC78 (talk) 22:56, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:South American Community of Nations table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 16:14, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:South American Community of Nations table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Union of South American Nations now uses {{infobox country}} to display its infobox. Unused. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 19:54, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 20:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant - speedy T3, possibly? Robofish (talk) 13:17, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WP ʃ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 15:46, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WP ʃ (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template of a dead WikiProject, not used anywhere. Pcap ping 19:16, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 20:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
'Comment what WikiProject? I don't see one. It links to an essay, saying something about articles needing merging. 76.66.197.30 (talk) 04:10, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - too vague to be of much use as an article notice. Redundant to more specific templates. Robofish (talk) 13:15, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Council constituencies of Birmingham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:37, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Council constituencies of Birmingham (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to and duplicates {{Wards of Birmingham}}. See use on Ladywood, for example. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 10:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, replace any use with {{wards of Birmingham}}. 81.110.104.91 (talk) 16:32, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - entirely redundant to existing template. Robofish (talk) 13:13, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Portal:Box-header II

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 15:44, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Although this is actually in the Portal namespace, it's used as a template, so I'm nominating it here (with some messy template hacking). It's unused, it's ugly, and it would be replaceable by {{Box-header}} if it were used anyway. Zetawoof_(ζ) 06:24, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and seemingly abandoned, with no talk and no edits since 2007. --RL0919 (talk) 13:57, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as RL0919. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 14:45, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:/Hungarian county seat name/test

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete, next time just CSD tag it as db-author Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:52, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:/Hungarian county seat name/test (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

R3: Delete: I accidentally prepended a "/" to the start of the page name. SimonTrew (talk) 02:19, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please DO NOT delete the one at Template:Hungarian county seat name/test, without the extraneous "/". Thanks. SimonTrew (talk) 02:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.