Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 May 14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 14

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete --Magioladitis (talk) 09:42, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mds (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template-space is not a place for quick shortcuts to long terms. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:53, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete --Magioladitis (talk) 09:42, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mdstype (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template-space is not a place for quick shortcuts to long terms. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:53, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete --Magioladitis (talk) 09:42, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mdst (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template-space is not a place for quick shortcuts to long terms. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:53, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. JPG-GR (talk) 18:44, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest preview software release/Linux (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:CSD#T3: Unused, redundant template, Template:Latest stable software release/Linux template doesn't exists anymore, better to use Template:Latest preview software release/Linux kernel KDesk (talk) 20:03, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason to delete any of these for things to work correctly, and in fact deleting any of these will break the Linux kernel article (and did before, the article was using hardcoded settings in the Infobox because one of the files had been CSD T3'd (and has since been restored). Please see Talk:Linux#Version number for details.
--Tothwolf (talk) 11:07, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete (CSD G2) —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 18:06, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Darian L. Smith Jr (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

pointless template Gurch (talk) 13:13, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 21:11, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MOM (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template simply inputs a particular flag and player name into a standardised format. This is easily done manually, however, and therefore there is no need to have a template to perform such a simple function. – PeeJay 01:11, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete --Magioladitis (talk) 19:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RfCheck-nom (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The proposal failed so this template is useless. PirateSmackKArrrr! 08:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.