Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 March 15
March 15
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete --Magioladitis (talk) 00:11, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Not in use. Another template demonstrating the same info has replaced it (Template:AFL Ladder/2007). The second template is more unifed with other ladder templates (Category:Australian Football League ladders navigational boxes. Thanks, - Allied45 (talk) 05:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete --Magioladitis (talk) 00:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
See below. –(de)jello ¿? 04:23, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Redirect to Template:Take-Two Interactive 76.66.201.179 (talk) 05:24, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete both per nom. --Odie5533 (talk) 06:45, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom as "redundant to a better-designed template" (Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Reasons to delete a template). We generally do not redirect obsolete templates unless they have a long history of usage. –Black Falcon (Talk) 03:12, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete --Magioladitis (talk) 00:14, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Both templates are not necessary due to the existence of Template:Take-Two Interactive, which includes both matters in a more comprehensive way. –(de)jello ¿? 04:23, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Redirect to Template:Take-Two Interactive 76.66.201.179 (talk) 05:23, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom as "redundant to a better-designed template" (Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Reasons to delete a template). We generally do not redirect obsolete templates unless they have a long history of usage. –Black Falcon (Talk) 03:12, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete --Magioladitis (talk) 00:15, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Entirely red-linked navigation template. Fails WP:CRYSTAL, as well. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 14:38, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. No articles are created yet, nor should they exist. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:25, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. None of them articles are likley to exist untill at least December 2009.Jason Rees (talk) 22:58, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete template fails WP:CRYSTAL --Odie5533 (talk) 07:07, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Happy‑melon 16:01, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Unused. {{Future product}} makes more sense. If there is a need for a smaller template we can just merge it to {{Future product}} by adding a small=yes parameter. Magioladitis (talk) 10:28, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Merge as option small=yes and reformat accordingly to make a small like in WikiProject banners. 76.66.201.179 (talk) 05:27, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete other version now has small=yes parameter. --Odie5533 (talk) 07:07, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.