Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 June 28
June 28
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 00:18, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Pointless and unnecessary template. There is one Blood: The Last Vampire article and one live-action film article. Blood+ is a related series, but it has its own template already. Even including it, three articles is not enough to clutter any of them with a template. Appropriate wikilinking is all that is needed. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:26, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not clear on why this is separate from the Blood+ template. The two are closely enough include in a single template, no? —Quasirandom (talk) 17:17, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- No, not really. Blood+ has enough to warrant a template (has four related articles). It is a spin off of Blood The Last Vampire, but other than having a main character named Saya and a handler named David, they are very different. No idea why this person decided to make a separate BTLV template. Even if it were felt both should share a template, he could have just proposed refocusing the existing template. However, for record, I would disagree with merging the two, because of the differences. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:22, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Even with the differences, I'm inclined toward merging the two. Blood+ may be an alternate continuity reboot, but together with Blood: The Last Vampire clearly forms a franchise. —Quasirandom (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- I tend to disagree. :P While Blood+ materials occasionally mention Blood TLV, Blood TLV materials rarely mention its spin-off/alternative. They seem to be treated as separate franchises, even by Production I.G. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 19:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - too few pages to justify a separate navbox. If someone wants to insist on having a navbox for the BTLV articles, the existing {{Blood+}} navbox should be expanded (but I'm against that as well, per Collectonian's above comments). 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 17:14, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - not enough articles to justify a navigational template. Robofish (talk) 21:20, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 00:17, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Template:Nls (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused, redundant to Template:Nld. --- RockMFR 15:36, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - apparently redundant. Redirecting to the other template would also be possible, but I don't think anyone's likely to use this. Robofish (talk) 21:19, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete (criterion G8: page dependent on a deleted page). –BLACK FALCON (TALK) 18:10, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Unused template for the deleted band Cronic Lataus. Looks to be part of User:Michelangelo24 universe of deleted articles. The fact that it's been broken since March or so with little interest should be indicative. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:02, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Lack of clear notability for the subject. The band article was deleted two times in separate months as a CSD A7. • Anakin (talk) 12:51, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.