Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 January 17

< January 16	January 18 >

January 17

Template:Kelly Clarkson singles

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2012 April 3.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete --Magioladitis (talk) 15:37, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kelly Clarkson singles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to Template:Kelly Clarkson. Clarkson does not have enough singles for a singles template to be necessary. Aspects (talk) 19:39, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, agreed. I wouldn't mind organizing the albums and singles the way they are in the template at hand, but there's no need at all for a seperate template. --Amalthea 22:55, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom.--Tru co 02:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Valley2city 03:18, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this contains redundant information. Regular Kelly Clarkson template is just fine. Whataworld06 (talk) 05:39, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Eastlaw (talk) 09:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Rocky Horror

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete --Magioladitis (talk) 15:32, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Rocky Horror (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; no edits since October 2007. PC78 (talk) 17:46, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, not of any use anyhow.--Tru co 02:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not used by any articles since creation. However don't salt because someone may have a use for it in the future. Valley2city 04:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Eastlaw (talk) 09:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Any article that would use it would probably fail WP:NOTE anyway. twirligig^{Leave one! ⋄ Check me out!} 22:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Basketball team player/role/G/F

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator because the template is in use indirectly. --B (talk) 20:28, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Basketball team player/role/G/F (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

~~Redundant to {{Basketball team player/role/GF}}, not used anywhere. GregorB (talk) 15:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)~~ Withdrawn, it is used after all! GregorB (talk) 18:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Eastlaw (talk) 09:44, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. twirligig^{Leave one! ⋄ Check me out!} 22:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - it is used, just not directly. On basketball rosters, if someone plays both guard and forward, and that is added to the position tag as G/F, this template will be used. Here is an example:

Note: Flags indicate national team eligibility at FIBA sanctioned events. Players may hold other non-FIBA nationality not displayed.

No.		Position	Player
40		G/F	A.D. Vassallo

I'm not 100% sure, but I don't know that special:whatlinkshere works all the time with those indirect template calls, so this might be used somewhere. If it isn't used anywhere right now, it might be in history somewhere. --B (talk)
Comment. B, you are right: it is used. (One example is Letran Knights.) Apparently the template is "invisible" to Whatlinkshere because of the particular way {{Basketball team player}} calls its subtemplates; it is not possible to statically detect all transclusions, which seems to be a blind spot of the MediaWiki software. Therefore, I'm withdrawing the nomination. GregorB (talk) 18:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Auto mi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete G2. JPG-GR (talk) 17:42, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Auto mi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Does not serve any obvious purpose, not used anywhere. GregorB (talk) 15:38, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Snowy Delete - pure nonsense.--Tru co 02:39, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as a WP:CSD#G2 test page. --Amalthea 03:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per Amalthea Valley2city 04:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as a test page. --Eastlaw (talk) 09:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

FS1037C-related talk templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete both I'll check again that the correct tags is in the mainspace and then I'll orphan and delete both templates. --Magioladitis (talk) 13:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FS1037C talk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:FS1037C MS188 talk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

As per the discussions which took place at Template_talk:DANFS#Problem_with_category_inclusion and Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2008_December_12#Template:DANFS_talk, these talk-page templates are no longer necessary, due to the use of hidden categories. They are obsolete, and those articles which have talk pages which transclude them, but do not contain the corresponding mainspace template in their articles, should be fixed. Eastlaw (talk) 01:24, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Concur - there is no need for a template for the talk page if there is also one for the mainspace article. —G716 <^T·_C> 05:31, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds reasonable to me. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:36, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Attribution_templates I counted 30 others, shouldn't they be voted on at the same time? BJ^Talk 05:43, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, if you want to expand this nomination to include all the talk-page attribution templates, that's fine with me. I didn't even realize there were that many. --Eastlaw (talk) 08:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Never mind, I did it myself. --Eastlaw (talk) 02:42, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Update: Thanks to AWB and its List Comparing function, I have made sure that all pages with these talk page tags have been tagged with the appropriate mainspace template. Now there is no reason to keep these templates. --Eastlaw (talk) 02:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.