Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 August 6

< August 5	August 7 >

August 6

Template:FC Barcelona Atlètic squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep User:Woohookitty ^{Diamming fool!} 04:22, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FC Barcelona Atlètic squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Squad template for Barcelona Atlétic, FC Barcelona reserve team, currently playing in Segunda Division B. Since the league is not fully professional, the listed players usually fail WP:ATHLETE (unless they already played in a higher tier, of course) and being part of such team (or even playing games on it) does not confer any sort of notability. Therefore, I am proposing to delete it, as already happened with similar squad templates for teams not playing in a fully professional league. Angelo (talk) 19:43, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - there are many squad templates for teams playing in non-fully-pro leagues (eg every team in England's Conference National and some from Conference South, etc. As long as the links aren't all red, I don't see a problem with templates like this -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:59, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's a useful navigation template with 10 blue links. Jafeluv (talk) 14:12, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rockferry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 11:11, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rockferry (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This album template is full of non-wikilinks and the album/singles are already covered by Template:Duffy. This template is only used on one article that Template:Duffy is not on, Please Stay (song), that is a non-single cover. Aspects (talk) 17:47, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CommentAs the creator of {{Rockferry}}, I realise that it is a bit excessive for the album to have its own template at this stage, although it does link to other associated articles. Dt¹²⁸_SpeakToMe 19:41, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Completely unnecessary- a navbox is for linking and there's nothing to link there except was it already covered by the Duffy navbox. Imperatore (talk) 14:39, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Famitsu perfect scores

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 09:42, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Famitsu perfect scores (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This seems to be a very awkward form of navigation - while in the gaming community, recognizition of a game by having a 40 or 39 from Famitsu is something of an honor, it is of trivial nature to the encyclopedic function. This may be better as a category but even then that's questionable and putting one source over all others MASEM (t) 13:15, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do apologise. I'm not particularly experienced at it. I just presumed it would be a good thing to do, considering each article in the template talks of its Famitsu status as a perfect or near-perfect score, and being able to navigate between each article from each article would make things easier. Your call, obviously :) AarnKrry _{Talk to me, babycakes!} 13:35, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The problem is that there's no inherent relation between the various games. A nav template is supposed to group pages that are related somehow, under a single topic or whatnot; furthermore, every game on the template is in the list at Famitsu which even MORE so reders this one unneeded. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 14:09, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There isn't a strong relationship between the articles in the navigation. Navigation templates are intended to allow users to find similar articles to the one they are reading; this template uses such an arbitrary criterion that at best, it can be used to explore other articles, but it won't be clear to users what they will find in the template, making it difficult to use for navigation purposes. Gary King (talk) 15:08, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Provided full titles are used instead of abbreviations (for example "MGS4:GotP" replaced by "Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots"), this is a useful template to navigate through all of the games that are considered to be "perfect" by the biggest Japanese gaming magazine in existence... even though they seem to have gotten a bit soft as of late. 76.107.137.39 (talk) 12:38, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Perhaps this could be a category, but even that is questionable. Definitely not a navbox. --Apoc2400 (talk) 23:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It was clearly made in good faith, but if too many templates are made like that then it gets very cluttered, very quickly.--Remurmur (talk) 16:59, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Games are unrelated to each other. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 09:23, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Could also be an example of journalistic bias.--_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 05:46, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Quoted straight out of Famitsu: "Several recent Famitsū scores have been subject to controversy, with accusations that the magazine is raising scores to appease advertisers and the gaming industry(...)" which renders the list inherently biased. --bitterMan.lha 12:29, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think that the template is rather helpful, and it's pretty cool to see what other games are considered 'Perfect' or 'Near-Perfect' by Famitsu, without having to leave the page. 72.191.111.95 (talk) 20:10, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nom --SkyWalker (talk) 09:03, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:La Liga 2006-07

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 09:52, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:La Liga 2006-07 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template superfluous. There are no season templates for superior competitions like UEFA Champions League 2006-07 or UEFA Cup 2006-07. League season articles should only carry a teamlist for the most recent season. Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 07:50, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. – Pee Jay 08:03, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This template is useful for team season's articles like FC Barcelona season 2006–07, Valencia CF season 2006–07 and Real Madrid C.F. season 2006–07. This template allows readers easy go to the other teams' articles.--ClaudioMB (talk) 15:24, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- And they can't do that by clicking on the team names in the league fixtures section? Don't be silly. – PeeJay 09:32, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - There is no league fixtures section, there is a fixtures section with all competitions. Not easy to find the other teams on La Liga 2006-07.--ClaudioMB (talk) 16:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - There would be if you followed the accepted format for club season articles. – Pee Jay 17:55, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; not needed. Giant Snowman 09:50, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:51, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I think it may only used in La Liga 2006–07.--KSA^connect 10:55, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If it will only be used in one article, why keep it? – Pee Jay 11:38, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - superflouous template, can't see any substantive use for it. - fchd (talk) 11:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - useless, only teamlist needed. - SonjiCeli (talk) 12:08, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.