Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 April 17
April 17
[edit]Ship events by decade
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Wknight94 talk 11:49, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- Template:Shipevents1860 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Shipevents1870 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Shipevents1880 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Shipevents1890 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Shipevents1900 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Shipevents1910 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Shipevents1920 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Shipevents1930 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Shipevents1940 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Shipevents1950 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Shipevents1960 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Shipevents1970 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Shipevents1980 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Shipevents1990 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Shipevents2000 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The functionality of these single-decade templates is superseded by the single template {{shipevents}} that takes a single year and generates the appropriate links. A recent bot run has replaced all uses of these templates in the article namespace. — Bellhalla (talk) 19:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Redirect to preserve history FMAFan1990 (talk) 06:37, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not asking to be flippant, but why does the history of these templates need to be preserved? — Bellhalla (talk) 10:32, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- I just feel that way FMAFan1990 (talk) 13:27, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, that's fine by me. I have no problems with redirecting whatsoever. I just wanted to know if there was a policy/guideline reason to file away in my little pumpkin head for future reference. Thanks for the reply. — Bellhalla (talk) 13:30, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- I just feel that way FMAFan1990 (talk) 13:27, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not asking to be flippant, but why does the history of these templates need to be preserved? — Bellhalla (talk) 10:32, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Everything looks clean and arranged now. --Brad (talk) 01:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nom. Garion96 (talk) 08:42, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Unused --User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 09:44, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
This is a hardcoded version of Template:North America topic that is not employed in any useful fashion. Neelix (talk) 18:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Unused --User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 09:44, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
This is a hardcoded version of Template:South America topic that is not employed in any useful fashion. Neelix (talk) 18:52, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete G1: patent nonsense. Happy‑melon 10:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Template:Occubox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Is an essay placed into Template space, any (as expected) is unused. I think it is a recreation of the content from sppedy deleted "Fanny Fraud". SPA made one edit in creating this, which has survived a month unnoticed. YobMod 09:52, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.