Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 September 30

< September 29	October 1 >

September 30

Template:2003 USA number one singles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 01:47, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2003 USA number one singles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete This template fails one of the basic premises of navigational templates: Navigation templates provide navigation between related articles. These songs are not related to one another. Per Wikipedia:Navigation templates: "Would a reader really want to go from A to B?" My answer would be no. We already have succession boxes that list the song before and after the song became number one with exact dates it was at number one and a link to the list of number one hits from that year. This template has no dates and uses numbers behind the wikilink which I presume to mean the number of weeks it was at number one. Aspects (talk) 23:26, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. We have other, better ways of presenting this information. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:39, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CurrentNFLKickers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was nomination withdrawn delldot ∇. 21:51, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CurrentNFLKickers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

non-needed template that is out of date and innacurate - -[The Spooky One] | ^{[t c r]} 00:21, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. —Wknight94 (talk) 10:54, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This wasn't tagged with {{tfd}} and wasn't listed at WP:NFL. Closer may want to consider relisting. —Wknight94 (talk) 10:58, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wizardman 00:53, 19 September 2008 (UTC) Re-relisting. delldot ∇. 20:18, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I see no reason to delete. It's concise and informative.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 20:31, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I hereby retract my nomination (i think i can do that...) at the time when i listed it for deletion; it was out of date; but has since been updated correctly. - -The Spooky One (talk to me) 21:01, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DRVU note

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 01:51, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DRVU note (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused DRV editor notification template specifically for Userboxes. Created in 2006, Template:DRVNote has since been revised to work with Userboxes. Template:DRVU note no longer is needed and should be deleted. -- Suntag ☼ 15:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Cricketer (Career)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 01:54, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Cricketer (Career) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated to {{Infobox cricketer biography}}; I've just finished replacing all mainspace transclusions with said template, so now orphaned (in the mainspace). (FWIW, the sandbox use is from several years ago and the article it was a base for also has the new template, so no harm done their either.) AllynJ (talk | contribs) 12:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. template standardisation is A Good Thing™ Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 12:37, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We have a better template now ({{Infobox cricketer biography}}). -- Magioladitis (talk) 20:46, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Football Manager squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete--no objections. delldot ∇. 02:12, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Football Manager squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This navigation box created over a year ago and is not used. The creator of the template also has not been active on Wikipedia since that time. Zyxw (talk) 12:20, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PJK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete as vandalism. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PJK (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template for musician/band who fails WP:BAND and WP:N. PJK is WP:SPEEDY candidate and albums have been PRODed. JD554 (talk) 11:35, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Third watch character

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete--no objections. delldot ∇. 02:13, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Third watch character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphan template. Redundant to {{Infobox character}} Magioladitis (talk) 10:50, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CityRail regional terminus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 02:14, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CityRail regional terminus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded template, now orphanned. MrHarper (talk) 06:26, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:01, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CityRail regional line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 02:16, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CityRail regional line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded template, now orphanned. MrHarper (talk) 06:25, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete. Unused. Consider group nominations next time, please. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CityRail intercity line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 02:18, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CityRail intercity line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded template, now orphanned. MrHarper (talk) 06:22, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused. Consider group nominations next time, please. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Start CityRail box

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 02:20, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Start CityRail box (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded template, now orphanned. MrHarper (talk) 06:21, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused. Consider group nominations next time, please. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CityRail terminus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 02:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CityRail terminus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded template, now orphanned. MrHarper (talk) 06:18, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused. Consider group nominations next time, please. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CityRail line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 02:26, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CityRail line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded template, now orphanned. MrHarper (talk) 06:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused. Consider group nominations next time, please. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Asian Collections

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was listify--no objections. Moving before deleting to preserve page history for GFDL. delldot ∇. 02:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to List of museums with major collections of Asian art

Template:Asian Collections (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete and listify. Too complex and contentious for a navbox. Per previous discussion on Western Art. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 00:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ancient Near East Museum Collections

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was listify--no objections. Moving before deleting to preserve page history for GFDL. delldot ∇. 02:42, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to list of museums with major collections of Ancient Near East art (please move to a better name if you can think of one) delldot ∇. 04:26, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ancient Near East Museum Collections (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete and listify. Too complex and contentious for a navbox. Per previous discussion on Western Art. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 00:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Coins, Medals and Paper Notes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was listify--no objections. Moving before deleting to preserve page history for GFDL. delldot ∇. 02:42, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to List of museums with major numismatic collections (please move to a better name if you can think of one). delldot ∇. 04:26, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Coins, Medals and Paper Notes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete and listify. Too complex and contentious for a navbox. Per previous discussion on Western Art. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 00:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Department of Africa, Oceania and the Americas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was listify--no objections. Moving before deleting to preserve page history for GFDL. delldot ∇. 02:42, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to list of museums with major collections in ethnography and anthropology (please move to a better name if you can think of one). delldot ∇. 04:26, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Department of Africa, Oceania and the Americas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete and listify. Too complex and contentious for a navbox. Per previous discussion on Western Art. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 00:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Egyptian museum collections

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was listify--no objections. Moving before deleting to preserve page history for GFDL. delldot ∇. 02:42, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to list of museums with major collections of Egyptian antiquities (please move to a better name if you can think of one). delldot ∇. 04:26, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Egyptian museum collections (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete and listify. Too complex and contentious for a navbox. Per previous discussion on Western Art. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 00:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Greek and Roman Collection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was listify--no objections. Moving before deleting to preserve page history for GFDL. delldot ∇. 02:42, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to list of museums with major collections of Greek and Roman antiquities (please move to a better name if you can think of one)

Template:Greek and Roman Collection (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete and listify. Too complex and contentious for a navbox. Per previous discussion on Western Art. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 00:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Islamic Art Collections

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was listify. Moving before deleting to preserve page history for GFDL. delldot ∇. 02:42, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to list of museums with major collections of Islamic art (please move to a better name if you can think of one) delldot ∇. 04:26, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Islamic Art Collections (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete and listify. Too complex and contentious for a navbox. Per previous discussion on Western Art. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 00:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment thanks for the notification, Kevlar. To be honest, this is the only template I've come across and when I found it, I didn't understand it in the slightest. As a museum article writer, I don't find it useful but I'd like to hear from someone with more familiarity about what it was meant to achieve. TravellingCari 01:53, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Prints and Drawings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was listify--no objections. Moving before deleting to preserve page history for GFDL. delldot ∇. 02:42, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to list of museums with major collections of European prints and drawings (please move to a better name if you can think of one) delldot ∇. 04:26, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Prints and Drawings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete and listify. Too complex and contentious for a navbox. Per previous discussion on Western Art. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 00:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. This is one of the most complicated templates hanging around. Nav templates are to make things easier not harder. -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:18, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.