Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 September 27

< September 26	September 28 >

September 27

Template:Automobile hubs of the World

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 21:41, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Automobile hubs of the World (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

What, in this context, is an "automobile hub", exactly? This template seems to merely provide unsourced indiscriminate information. Furthermore, its entire purpose seems to be to provide an extremely tenuous link between the places named in it. RFBailey (talk) 17:53, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No real criteria for inclusion. The Motor City makes perfect sense, but the rest… eh. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:14, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The meaning and purpose of this template are unclear. --DAJF (talk) 00:51, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete.Ok to delete.Thomas Paine1776 (talk) 16:57, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unhelpful and subjective (and in any case incomplete). Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 18:17, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2004 USA number one singles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 22:40, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2004 USA number one singles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete This template fails one of the basic premises of navigational templates: Navigation templates provide navigation between related articles. These songs are not related to one another. Per Wikipedia:Navigation templates: "Would a reader really want to go from A to B?" My answer would be no. We already have succession boxes that list the song before and after the song became number one with exact dates it was at number one and a link to the list of number one hits from that year. This template has no dates and uses numbers behind the wikilink which I presume to mean the number of weeks it was at number one. Aspects (talk) 17:01, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not a very useful template, songs aren't related besides being Number One hits. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, also delete the UK templates, nominated on 28 September. - eo (talk) 11:25, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2005 USA number one singles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete delldot ∇. 22:54, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2005 USA number one singles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete This template fails one of the basic premises of navigational templates: Navigation templates provide navigation between related articles. These songs are not related to one another. Per Wikipedia:Navigation templates: "Would a reader really want to go from A to B?" My answer would be no. We already have succession boxes that list the song before and after the song became number one with exact dates it was at number one and a link to the list of number one hits from that year. This template has no dates and uses numbers behind the wikilink which I presume to mean the number of weeks it was at number one. Aspects (talk) 17:01, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not a very useful template, songs aren't related besides being Number One hits. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, also delete the UK templates, nominated on 28 September. - eo (talk) 11:25, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2006 USA number one singles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 23:21, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2006 USA number one singles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete This template fails one of the basic premises of navigational templates: Navigation templates provide navigation between related articles. These songs are not related to one another. Per Wikipedia:Navigation templates: "Would a reader really want to go from A to B?" My answer would be no. We already have succession boxes that list the song before and after the song became number one with exact dates it was at number one and a link to the list of number one hits from that year. This template has no dates and uses numbers behind the wikilink which I presume to mean the number of weeks it was at number one. Aspects (talk) 17:00, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not a very useful template, songs aren't related besides being Number One hits. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, also delete the UK templates, nominated on 28 September. - eo (talk) 11:25, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2007 USA number one singles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 23:23, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2007 USA number one singles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete This template fails one of the basic premises of navigational templates: Navigation templates provide navigation between related articles. These songs are not related to one another. Per Wikipedia:Navigation templates: "Would a reader really want to go from A to B?" My answer would be no. We already have succession boxes that list the song before and after the song became number one with exact dates it was at number one and a link to the list of number one hits from that year. This template has no dates and uses numbers behind the wikilink which I presume to mean the number of weeks it was at number one. Aspects (talk) 17:00, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not a very useful template, songs aren't related besides being Number One hits. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, also delete the UK templates, nominated on 28 September. - eo (talk) 11:25, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2008 USA number one singles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 23:23, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2008 USA number one singles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete This template fails one of the basic premises of navigational templates: Navigation templates provide navigation between related articles. These songs are not related to one another. Per Wikipedia:Navigation templates: "Would a reader really want to go from A to B?" My answer would be no. We already have succession boxes that list the song before and after the song became number one with exact dates it was at number one and a link to the list of number one hits from that year. This template has no dates and uses numbers behind the wikilink which I presume to mean the number of weeks it was at number one. Aspects (talk) 16:58, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not a very useful template, songs aren't related besides being Number One hits. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:11, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, also delete the UK templates, nominated on 28 September. - eo (talk) 11:25, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Village in Ukraine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 00:23, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Village in Ukraine (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox settlement}}~~; only used twice~~. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 12:59, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Redundant. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 21:59, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Update: Unused. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 21:54, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Little House character

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 00:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Little House character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphan infobox template. All characters, in which this template could apply, can be covered by {{Infobox character}} or {{Infobox soap character}} with no problems at all. Magioladitis (talk) 10:27, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Redundant to {{infobox character}}. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:13, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per above Prince of Canada^{t | c} 00:44, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Small gay child

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete as vandalism/attack page. --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 07:55, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Small gay child (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template was created by User:Redscousa whose only contribution was vandalism to the Nathan Clarke article. Template does not link to anything. Kman543210 (talk) 04:43, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.